gt;
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Jul 27, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Adrian.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ruppert
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 26,
ppert
>>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cool. Thanks Scott and Adam! All of the backports I had in mind have been
>>>> committed.
>>>>
>>>> -Adrian
>>>>
>>>> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Ad
>>
>>> Cool. Thanks Scott and Adam! All of the backports I had in mind have been
>>> committed.
>>>
>>> -Adrian
>>>
>>> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Adam Heath
>>>> Subject: Re
On 07/29/2010 01:53 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I guess the basic questions might be: Did we have an official "freeze"
process where we only accepted bug fixes against that branch? Do we have
any open bugs that are considered "release critical"?
I agree. At least *all* bugs should be looked at,
On Jul 29, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I guess the basic questions might be: Did we have an official "freeze"
> process where we only accepted bug fixes against that branch?
Yes.
> Do we have any open bugs that are considered "release critical"?
No.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
>
>
I guess the basic questions might be: Did we have an official "freeze"
process where we only accepted bug fixes against that branch? Do we have
any open bugs that are considered "release critical"?
On 07/26/2010 10:16 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
Hi,
Ofbiz release branch 10.04 has been around for qui
> Ruppert
>
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>> Cool. Thanks Scott and Adam! All of the backports I had in mind have been
>> committed.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> From: Adam Heat
Thanks Adrian.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Cool. Thanks Scott and Adam! All of the backports I had in mind have been
> committed.
>
> -Adrian
>
> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> From: Adam Heath
>> Subje
Cool. Thanks Scott and Adam! All of the backports I had in mind have been
committed.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: Create Release from 10.04 release branch
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 9:46 PM
> Ad
Adrian Crum wrote:
> I still need to backport some fixes to the branch.
>
> I would like to remove the conversion framework from the entity engine - for
> the same reason I did it in the trunk. I would just remove the conversion
> code in the branch and I would not include the new JdbcValueHandl
isn't a bug
> fix, but it could help users of the release find
> compatibility problems with various databases.
>
> I think back porting tests has come up before in
> discussions, personally I'm hugely in favor of it.
>
> >
> > -Adrian
> >
> >
ns, personally I'm
hugely in favor of it.
>
> -Adrian
>
> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Scott Gray wrote:
>
>> From: Scott Gray
>> Subject: Re: Create Release from 10.04 release branch
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Cc: "Anil Patel"
>> Date: Monday,
to add the expanded entity engine tests - if there are no
objections. I know that isn't a bug fix, but it could help users of the release
find compatibility problems with various databases.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Scott Gray wrote:
> From: Scott Gray
> Subject: Re: Create R
I'm in favor of releasing it, 3 months have passed since we created the branch
and it is relatively stable (!= bug free) now with no known deal breaking bugs
as far as I am aware.
Regards
Scott
On 27/07/2010, at 3:16 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
> Hi,
> Ofbiz release branch 10.04 has been around for
14 matches
Mail list logo
