Adrian,
this is a nice idea.
so +1
2012/7/12 Adrian Crum :
> Yes, anything to do with scripting would go there.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On 7/12/2012 2:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>
>> would a new scripting language be in the same component.
>>
>> Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/12/2012 5:57 AM:
>>>
>>
Yes, anything to do with scripting would go there.
-Adrian
On 7/12/2012 2:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
would a new scripting language be in the same component.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/12/2012 5:57 AM:
I don't understand the question, sorry.
-Adrian
On 7/12/2012 1:55 PM, BJ Freeman w
would a new scripting language be in the same component.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/12/2012 5:57 AM:
I don't understand the question, sorry.
-Adrian
On 7/12/2012 1:55 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
so how would this work with a new scripting , like business basic.
Adrian Crum sent the follow
I don't understand the question, sorry.
-Adrian
On 7/12/2012 1:55 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
so how would this work with a new scripting , like business basic.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/12/2012 2:56 AM:
That is true for now, but I was thinking farther down the road. For now
we could just
so how would this work with a new scripting , like business basic.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/12/2012 2:56 AM:
That is true for now, but I was thinking farther down the road. For now
we could just consolidate the code in base, common, and minilang.
-Adrian
On 7/12/2012 10:40 AM, Jacop
That is true for now, but I was thinking farther down the road. For now
we could just consolidate the code in base, common, and minilang.
-Adrian
On 7/12/2012 10:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian,
it is an interesting proposal.
If I well understand your proposal then the new "scripting"
Adrian,
it is an interesting proposal.
If I well understand your proposal then the new "scripting" component will
depend on (mostly) all the 4 components... let me try to explain with an
example.
A) in theory with the current setup you could enable the service component and
that will give you
Mini-language could be moved to the script component or it could remain
its own component.
Some of the things that would be moved are:
ScriptHelper.java, Scriptlet.java, ScriptUtil.java, GroovyUtil.java,
BshUtil.java, javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory, ContextHelper.java,
ScriptHelperFactoryIm
It's not quite clear to me
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
The code for scripting support is scattered across several different
components. I would like to move all scripting-related code to a
separate component called "script" or "scripting". I believe this will
help make things more modular an
are you thinking of just mini, or js, grouvy or what ever?
Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/11/2012 7:16 AM:
The code for scripting support is scattered across several different
components. I would like to move all scripting-related code to a
separate component called "script" or "scripting".
10 matches
Mail list logo