Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/30/2012 6:06 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/30/2012 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/30/2012 4:30 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/30/2012 02:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM,
On 5/30/2012 6:29 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/30/2012 12:22 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I need to reacquaint myself with the entity engine code. I was
thinking the visitor pattern could be used to construct the SQL string
instead of the complicated if-then-else code spread across a number of
classes.
On 05/30/2012 12:22 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
>>> I need to reacquaint myself with the entity engine code. I was
>>> thinking the visitor pattern could be used to construct the SQL string
>>> instead of the complicated if-then-else code spread across a number of
>>> classes. We could use different
On 5/30/2012 6:06 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/30/2012 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/30/2012 4:30 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/30/2012 02:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wro
On 05/30/2012 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> On 5/30/2012 4:30 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 02:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>> On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> From: "Jacques
On 5/30/2012 4:30 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/30/2012 02:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le
On 05/30/2012 02:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>> On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>> On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
> From: "Adam Heath"
>> On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
The idea
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 29, 2012, at 6:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Great, but still, why not a branch as long as it's not finished?
Jacques
branches/improved-entityengine-features-20120528
Also see 1343540, which adds a README that has some things that we might want
to implement in t
Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
The idea was that you would pa
On May 29, 2012, at 6:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Great, but still, why not a branch as long as it's not finished?
Jacques
>
> branches/improved-entityengine-features-20120528
>
> Also see 1343540, which adds a README that has some things that we might want
> to implement in
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
The idea was that you would parse the sqlConditio
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
The idea was that you would parse the sqlCondition once, in a static
{}
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
The idea was that you would parse the sqlCondition once, in a static
{} block somewhere, the
May be doing a little example code that shows how it works and the
performance impact can help developers with implementation in various areas.
Regards,
Pierre
2012/5/25 Adam Heath
> On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> From: "Adam Heath"
>>
>>> On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Hea
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of i
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
documentation to s
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
documentation to say the least), there
From: "Adam Heath"
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
documentation to say the least), there are not only addressed to
Adam...
About javacc
Thanks Adrian
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal documentation
to say the least), there are not only addressed to Adam...
About javacc dependency do we really need it *OOTB*?
Can't we use rather e
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>> On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
>>> documentation to say the least), there are not only addressed to
>>> Adam...
>>>
>>> About javacc d
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
>> documentation to say the least), there are not only addressed to
>> Adam...
>>
>> About javacc dependency do we really need it *OOTB*?
>> Can't we
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal documentation
to say the least), there are not only addressed to Adam...
About javacc dependency do we really need it *OOTB*?
Can't we use rather externally maintained ant targets like in
ant-
23 matches
Mail list logo
