Yeah, I'd have to give a +1 to either fixing it right or not messing
with it. This does appear to be hiding the actual issue
On Mar 25, 2008, at 1:44 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Hans
That's not a bugfix, that's just working around (and hiding) the
actual bug.
If you don't want to fix the
Hi David,
the reason i changed it is, that i got an error message together with
the message of the missing OUT parameter. This was blocking me to use
the order creation function. This change fixed the problem and i was
able to create the order.
Hans
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 07:29 -0600, David E
Hi Hans
That's not a bugfix, that's just working around (and hiding) the actual bug.
If you don't want to fix the bug then it would be best to just comment out
the offending seca in your local copy until the bug gets fixed.
My 2 cents anyway
Regards
Scott
On 25/03/2008, Hans Bakker [EMAIL
I haven't looked into exactly what is behind this, but generally if
there is an error then the OUT parameters are not validated.
OUT parameters should be designed for the success, or rather non-
error, scenarios and it is expected that if there is an error then the
expected output
