That was a translation of your feeling :-)
On 12/05/15 14:51, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I guess it's a matter of feeling, I did not even vote and got a -0.9 :)
Jacques
Le 12/05/2015 08:59, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Le 12/05/2015 03:19, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Nicolas -0.9
:) I voted -0 Hans not
Good suggestions, Michael
On 12/05/15 15:06, Michael Brohl wrote:
Thanks Hans for taking the effort, but...
- I see a Nicolas 3 times? I know of Julien Nicolas and Nicolas Mailin...
- Martin Becker's vote is missing (ok, he introduced a new value,
maybe it does not count)
The last votes were
Thanks Hans for taking the effort, but...
- I see a Nicolas 3 times? I know of Julien Nicolas and Nicolas Mailin...
- Martin Becker's vote is missing (ok, he introduced a new value, maybe
it does not count)
The last votes were a little bit confusing and are at least hard to
follow. Maybe we s
I guess it's a matter of feeling, I did not even vote and got a -0.9 :)
Jacques
Le 12/05/2015 08:59, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Le 12/05/2015 03:19, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Nicolas -0.9
:) I voted -0 Hans not -0.9 it's not the same ;)
Le 12/05/2015 03:19, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Nicolas -0.9
:) I voted -0 Hans not -0.9 it's not the same ;)
Are git patches acceptable or should they be provided as svn instead?
Command line supports git to svn formatting but I haven't found a way to
do so in eclipse yet. If git isn't an acceptable format I'll make an
effort to convert all the patches I've provided for the past couple of
weeks.
On Tue,
Thank you for the interst and 126 messages on this subject.
Looks like we do not want to go with the technological developments yet.
Thank you all for your time.
The result of the vote if we should move to git:
Binding:
Jacques -0.9
Nicolas -0.9
Jacopo -1
Adam +0
Scott +0
Nicolas +0
Non Bindi
