--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath
> wrote:
> >> Scott Gray wrote:
> >>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> >>>
> The above method makes use of a
> BigDecimal.
> >> This is wrong. It should
> be an int. Original
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
The above method makes use of a BigDecimal.
>> This is wrong. It should
be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal
>> conversion, it was a
Doubl
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
The above method makes use of a BigDecimal.
>> This is wrong. It should
be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal
>> conversion, it was a
Doubl
Scott Gray wrote:
> On 26/03/2010, at 6:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should
be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a
Doub
On 26/03/2010, at 6:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should
>>> be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a
>>> Double. This method should hav
--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> Scott Gray wrote:
> > On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> >
> >> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal.
> This is wrong. It should
> >> be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal
> conversion, it was a
> >> Double. This method should
Scott Gray wrote:
> On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should
>> be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a
>> Double. This method should have never been converted.
>
> It looked like a good ca
On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should
> be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a
> Double. This method should have never been converted.
It looked like a good candidate at the time and looki
The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should
be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a
Double. This method should have never been converted.
Also, it does time internal calculation wrong. It will have the same
daylight savings time problem, when
