Re: Test Practices and Patterns (was Re: svn commit: r750296 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/testtools: dtd/test-suite.xsd src/org/ofbiz/testtools/ModelTestSuite.java src/org/ofbiz/testtools/TestListConta

2009-03-05 Thread Tim Ruppert
Gentlemen, great debate. I will provide a bit more information a bit later as I don't want to answer without fully running thru all of the scenarios that everyone lays out. Adam - thanks for pushing on this - it's needed it for a long time. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.h

Re: Test Practices and Patterns (was Re: svn commit: r750296 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/testtools: dtd/test-suite.xsd src/org/ofbiz/testtools/ModelTestSuite.java src/org/ofbiz/testtools/TestListConta

2009-03-04 Thread Adam Heath
David E Jones wrote: > *** First off Adam: it's great to see you working on this stuff, the > testing stuff in general needs a LOT more work and hasn't seen much > attention, so yeah... this is great. Completely automatic tests with no side-effects is what I am striving for. I believe we are clos

Re: Test Practices and Patterns (was Re: svn commit: r750296 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/testtools: dtd/test-suite.xsd src/org/ofbiz/testtools/ModelTestSuite.java src/org/ofbiz/testtools/TestListConta

2009-03-04 Thread David E Jones
*** First off Adam: it's great to see you working on this stuff, the testing stuff in general needs a LOT more work and hasn't seen much attention, so yeah... this is great. On Mar 4, 2009, at 9:25 PM, Adam Heath wrote: The service engine tests define several different test cases. The s

Re: Test Practices and Patterns (was Re: svn commit: r750296 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/testtools: dtd/test-suite.xsd src/org/ofbiz/testtools/ModelTestSuite.java src/org/ofbiz/testtools/TestListConta

2009-03-04 Thread Adam Heath
David E Jones wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> David E Jones wrote: >>> >>> Why not just use different test-suite elements for this? Why have an >>> hierarchy in this? >>> >>> Actually... I'm not even sure what "this" is, ie what is the point of a >>> group? Maybe we