Re: birt component without duplicates : objection against merging?

2009-11-25 Thread Tim Ruppert
-1 until the licensing and other issues are resolved. Cheers, Ruppert On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Scott Gray wrote: On 26/11/2009, at 1:29 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem. concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse foundation is

Re: birt component without duplicates : objection against merging?

2009-11-25 Thread Scott Gray
On 26/11/2009, at 1:29 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem. concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be more roman catholic than the pope.. What on Earth are you

Re: birt component without duplicates : objection against merging?

2009-11-25 Thread Adam Heath
Hans Bakker wrote: > concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse > foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be > more roman catholic than the pope.. No. You can't just blindly relicense something. That's the whole point of it being a license.

birt component without duplicates : objection against merging?

2009-11-25 Thread Hans Bakker
Chattree has fixed the duplicated jar problem. concerning the license, my opinion is what is good for the eclipse foundation is good for Apache. We have a saying here: we should not be more roman catholic than the pope.. so what is the community opinion? can we merge the addbirt branch back