David E Jones wrote:
> Adam,
>
> Your second email sounds more like code monitoring than ownership. Is that
> more of what you had in mind?
Hm, yes, monitor might be a better term.
> As far as whether these constraints are considered a policy or an obligation
> for other committers, I guess we
Adam,
Your second email sounds more like code monitoring than ownership. Is that more
of what you had in mind?
As far as whether these constraints are considered a policy or an obligation
for other committers, I guess we'd have to vote on that. I don't think we have
anything setup (yet) to al
Thanks Adam! I'm trying to include tests in my commits. It would be cool if
others did the same.
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 3/14/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: code ownership
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Sunday, March 14, 2010, 9:40 PM
> So, with the
Anil Patel wrote:
> Adam,
> Thanks for hard work. I am sure people in community respect your effort and
> will co-operate.
This decision of mine doesn't preclude others from doing work in these
classes. But I will be watching these classes like a hawk, and would
greatly appreciate anyone that wa
Adam,
Thanks for hard work. I am sure people in community respect your effort and
will co-operate.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
On Mar 15, 2010, at 12:40 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> So, with the recent threads we
So, with the recent threads we've participated in, I've decided to
announce a decision of mine.
Any class that I have added test cases that have gotten to 100%
coverage, I have decided to take ownership of. Any change that is
done to such a class *must* have a test case that keeps the coverage
at
