Re: possible solution to OOTB tests

2008-11-10 Thread Adam Heath
David E Jones wrote: > The entity audit stuff could do this, perhaps, but would be REALLY > inefficient as it records changes to one field at a time. It may be > faster to truncate all tables and just reload the demo data in order to > refresh it... I'm talking about the audit stuff, and yeah, pe

Re: possible solution to OOTB tests

2008-11-10 Thread David E Jones
On Nov 10, 2008, at 11:30 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Tim Ruppert wrote: That's typically the process I've used with other tools, but I didn't know this type of serialization was already built into OFBiz. Sounds pretty cool. Well, it's not featureful enough. I've seen messages in the log about E

Re: possible solution to OOTB tests

2008-11-10 Thread Adam Heath
Tim Ruppert wrote: > That's typically the process I've used with other tools, but I didn't > know this type of serialization was already built into OFBiz. Sounds > pretty cool. Well, it's not featureful enough. I've seen messages in the log about EntityAuditLog. After I sent that email, I looke

Re: possible solution to OOTB tests

2008-11-10 Thread Tim Ruppert
That's typically the process I've used with other tools, but I didn't know this type of serialization was already built into OFBiz. Sounds pretty cool. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Nov 10, 2008, at 5:59 PM, Adam Heath w

possible solution to OOTB tests

2008-11-10 Thread Adam Heath
How about using the EntitySync stuff, to record all changes during a test run, then 'undoing' them?