Thanks,
I have fixed it (and re enabled) in rev. 922813
I have used the trick to compare for equality but also accept a difference of
+1 or -1
It should be ok for this test.
Jacopo
On Mar 13, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Sat, 3/13/10, Jacopo Cappellato
On Mar 13, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Understanding the difference between wall clock time and elapsed time is
especially important in manufacturing. They are completely different, and
manufacturing depends on both.
The problem with the test is it advances the wall clock,
Adam, Adrian,
in the meantime thanks for the bug report (on the automated test!), I have
disabled it for now and I will bring it back as soon as I will fix it.
Jacopo
On Mar 13, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adam Heath
: production-run-tests.testProductionRunDateChange
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 3:19 AM
Adam, Adrian,
in the meantime thanks for the bug report (on the automated
test!), I have disabled it for now and I will bring it back
as soon as I will fix it.
Jacopo
On Mar 13
--- On Sat, 3/13/10, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
On Mar 13, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Understanding the difference between wall clock time
and elapsed time is especially important in manufacturing.
They are completely different, and
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right now? In the US?
The above test fails, because the start date is now, but the end date
is in the future *past* when daylight savings time takes place. So
the interval is off by one hour, and the assertion fails.
Does
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the start date is now, but
the end date
is in the future *past* when daylight savings time takes
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the start date is now, but
the end date
is in the future *past* when daylight
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right
now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the start date
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right
now? In
the US?
The above test fails, because the
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried running the test suite right
now? In
the US?
The above test
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has anyone tried
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
wrote:
ah ha!
This is just excellent.
Has
14 matches
Mail list logo
