Re: svn commit: r1165122 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/party/servicedef/services.xml

2011-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Scott, This was not pretty obvious. I will revert all (trunk included) and add a comment there for future, every where also... Is that not easier than any other means? BTW thanks for the info about FishEye feature to receive email notifications about changes to a specific file

Re: svn commit: r1165122 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/party/servicedef/services.xml

2011-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW, it would have been much easier for me if someone would have noticed it before. I wrote about it on user and dev MLs already some days ago (5 Sept.) Thanks to care anyway Jacques Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Scott, This was not pretty obvious. I will revert all (trunk included) and add

Re: svn commit: r1165122 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/party/servicedef/services.xml

2011-09-11 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Jacques, This is not a good backport, changing the service definition could break deployments that have come to depend on the firstName and lastName being optional. It's also worth noting that they were made optional intentionally:

Re: svn commit: r1165122 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/party/servicedef/services.xml

2011-09-11 Thread Adrian Crum
Thanks for noticing that Scott. Actually, the change in the trunk is not a good one either - for the same reason. -Adrian On 9/11/2011 11:50 PM, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacques, This is not a good backport, changing the service definition could break deployments that have come to depend on the

Re: svn commit: r1165122 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/party/servicedef/services.xml

2011-09-11 Thread Scott Gray
As a side note, if anything seems in the least bit strange to me the first thing I ALWAYS do is to check the revision history for the code in question. It can give a lot of insight into why things are the way they are, who made it that way and provides the context for a discussion about making

Re: svn commit: r1165122 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/party/servicedef/services.xml

2011-09-11 Thread David E Jones
My favorite is the FishEye UI, provided by Atlassian: https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ofbiz -David On Sep 11, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Scott Gray wrote: As a side note, if anything seems in the least bit strange to me the first thing I ALWAYS do is to check the revision history for the

Re: svn commit: r1165122 - in /ofbiz/branches/release10.04: ./ applications/party/servicedef/services.xml

2011-09-11 Thread Scott Gray
+1, I use it from time to time, especially if I want to receive email notifications about changes to a specific file which is a pretty awesome feature. Regards Scott On 12/09/2011, at 12:24 PM, David E Jones wrote: My favorite is the FishEye UI, provided by Atlassian: