Thanks for taking another look at it Hans, and you're probably right that the
owner by itself probably isn't the best way to solve the problem.
In general, neither of the products you mention below are sales/purchase
shipments but I guess you are using those shipment types for them. Have you
Hi Scott,
We looked into your comment, but found that inventoryitem owner is not
always affecting accounting:
1. service product: foreign owner: no account update
2. rental product: is owner: also no accounting update
we are following however your remark to generalize:
for both product types we
valuable comment...will look into it.
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 22:14 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> IMO it would probably be more robust to let the service execute and then
> check who the owner of the inventoryItem is before creating the transactions
> instead of checking the productType
Hi Hans,
IMO it would probably be more robust to let the service execute and then check
who the owner of the inventoryItem is before creating the transactions instead
of checking the productTypeId. This would cover a much larger range of receipt
and issuances in the future and really is the tr
I see Jacques is working on your issue. The changes we made are for the
specific product type only, so i do not expect a conflict here.
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 19:24 -0700, Paul Foxworthy wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> If you're working in the ItemIssuance area, you might want to look at
>
Hi Hans,
If you're working in the ItemIssuance area, you might want to look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4386 . I reckon there's a nasty
bug there, and the Jira issue has a unit test to demonstrate it and a patch.
Since your change is for service products, I doubt there's any
