Thank you Hans.
-Adrian
On 2/22/2012 8:37 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
It took some time agrian, we we just implemented your comment in
revision 1292180.
On 01/23/2012 01:50 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
Why would you do this? This commit makes the commonext component
dependent on two special pur
Sorry, Just a typo in your name i meant of course: Adrian
Regards,
Hans
On 02/22/2012 03:37 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
It took some time agrian, we we just implemented your comment in
revision 1292180.
On 01/23/2012 01:50 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
Why would you do this? This commit makes the
It took some time agrian, we we just implemented your comment in
revision 1292180.
On 01/23/2012 01:50 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
Why would you do this? This commit makes the commonext component
dependent on two special purpose components. Please keep
application-specific code inside the a
Hans,
Maybe I did not make myself clear. Please keep application-specific code
inside the application. SCRUM code belongs in the SCRUM component, not
in the commonext component.
-Adrian
On 1/22/2012 10:13 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Ardrian,
Please remember that these info messages are gener
Hi Ardrian,
Please remember that these info messages are generated by the related
components. So if the scrum coponent is not used, it will not generate
any scrum specifc messages so the link back into the scrum component
will not happen.
The same with the other components
Regards,
Hans
Hans,
Why would you do this? This commit makes the commonext component
dependent on two special purpose components. Please keep
application-specific code inside the application.
-Adrian
On 12/13/2011 4:23 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hansbak
Date: Tue Dec 13 04:23:50 2011
New Revis
