and as much as I want to have yet another rant about you not testing
changes before back porting them to the release branches I'm just
going to sigh and consider stable branches a failed experiment.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Scott Gray
wrote:
> I know it looks like this makes sense
I know it looks like this makes sense at first glance but sometimes it's
useful to look at the history of changes. It should be clear that
something is amiss because of the useless try/catch block directly below
your change. It points out that perhaps this code previously did something
similar to
