Re: svn commit: r746649 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/controller.xml

2009-02-23 Thread David E Jones
This is probably caused by the fix for the long-standing issue with the old stuff that put form fields in the URL string. Now the behavior of the request-redirect response is: 1. use the redirect-parameter fields if there are any specified 2. if there are no redirect-parameter fields

Re: svn commit: r746649 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/controller.xml

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Bakker
Thank you david, i was provoking this a bit, and thank you for the explanation. I knew there was changed something but forgot what it wasSo the request is fine here. regards, Hans On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 01:58 -0700, David E Jones wrote: This is probably caused by the fix for the

Re: svn commit: r746649 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/controller.xml

2009-02-23 Thread David E Jones
Yes, request is fine, and in many/most cases request-redirect will result in a better user experience. The example application now has pretty complete examples of this where it goes back to a clean URL that represents a view instead of the URL for the form submission. -David On Feb 23,

Re: svn commit: r746649 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/controller.xml

2009-02-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Should we not preferably solve the origin of the issue ? Are there any side-effects coming from this change ? Else why a request-redirect was previously used ? Jacques From: hans...@apache.org Author: hansbak Date: Sun Feb 22 09:04:32 2009 New Revision: 746649 URL: