ulling it out as it was only 10 minutes work.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adrian Crum"
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:39:45 AM (GMT+1000) Auto-Detected
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r784712 - in /o
Message -
From: "Adrian Crum"
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:39:45 AM (GMT+1000) Auto-Detected
Subject: Re: svn commit: r784712 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp:
config/freemarkerTransforms.properties
src/org/ofbiz/webapp/ftl/IncludeTemplateTransform.j
Detected
Subject: Re: svn commit: r784712 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp:
config/freemarkerTransforms.properties
src/org/ofbiz/webapp/ftl/IncludeTemplateTransform.java
Why is this necessary? Freemarker already has an include directive.
-Adrian
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lektran
&
I never tried, thanks!
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Use a file: URL.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I'm not sure it's the reason but with the Freemarker include directive you can't get a file out of the webapp root (there is no
real absolute path option)
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Why
Use a file: URL.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I'm not sure it's the reason but with the Freemarker include directive
you can't get a file out of the webapp root (there is no real absolute
path option)
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Why is this necessary? Freemarker already has an include d
I'm not sure it's the reason but with the Freemarker include directive you can't get a file out of the webapp root (there is no real
absolute path option)
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Why is this necessary? Freemarker already has an include directive.
-Adrian
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
Autho
Why is this necessary? Freemarker already has an include directive.
-Adrian
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lektran
Date: Mon Jun 15 10:18:55 2009
New Revision: 784712
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784712&view=rev
Log:
Add a new template transform for including templates in freemarke
