From: "Scott Gray"
On 26/11/2009, at 11:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This came from my commit at r886549 < 0) and (obj
!= null) || (obj.size > 0)>>
I have fixed it the right way.
I'm guessing this occurred because you were using a regex search and replace, they are useful but you have to
On 26/11/2009, at 11:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This came from my commit at r886549 0) and (obj !=
null) || (obj.size > 0)>>
I have fixed it the right way.
I'm guessing this occurred because you were using a regex search and
replace, th
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
So build-website and copy-apis targets are also used by scripts ? I
thought only docs-all was needed ?
I was just guessing, since the folders that weren't found by Contegix
are the same ones you commented out.
-Adrian
This came from my commit at r886549 < 0) and (obj !=
null) || (obj.size > 0)>>
I have fixed it the right way.
Yes, it's surprising it passes ant run but not ant docs-all
So build-website and copy-apis targets are also used by scripts ? I thought
only docs-all was needed ?
Jacques
From: "Scot
On 26/11/2009, at 11:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lektran
Date: Wed Nov 25 22:03:53 2009
New Revision: 884292
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=884292&view=rev
Log:
Fix invalid code that causing the docs-all target to fail
If this code isn't built during a n
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lektran
> Date: Wed Nov 25 22:03:53 2009
> New Revision: 884292
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=884292&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix invalid code that causing the docs-all target to fail
If this code isn't built during a normal ant compile run, then the
docs
