Re: Review Request: Purposed Changes to Workflow, WorkflowInstance, and WorkflowProcessor

2012-11-08 Thread brian Foster
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7944/ --- (Updated Nov. 9, 2012, 1:38 a.m.) Review request for oodt, Chris Mattmann and Pa

Re: Workflow Task/Condition Instances...

2012-11-08 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Thanks Bruce -- yep we carry it forward as a model called "Workflow" which has a corresponding Java class hierarchy behind it, and a serialized representation in XML, and in a DB format. Cheers, Chris On Nov 9, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Bruce Barkstrom wrote: > You might consider building the graph in

Re: Workflow Task/Condition Instances...

2012-11-08 Thread Bruce Barkstrom
I've got a paper a year or two ago that describes the production graph. The paper was in Earth Science Informatics and is something like "Provenance Tracking ..." The nodes in the graph (at the most granular level) are the individual Product Generation Executables (usually abbreviated PGE's). Th

Re: Workflow Task/Condition Instances...

2012-11-08 Thread Brian Foster
hey bruce... ya i'm thinking of probably introducing some kinda of store that for a given WorkflowInstance you can determine if it belongs to a Graph, and if it does then create WorkflowInstance for the next Workflows in the Graph and run them. thanks! -brian On Nov 8, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Bruc

Re: Workflow Task/Condition Instances...

2012-11-08 Thread Bruce Barkstrom
You might consider building the graph in advance and use it for planning purposes. Bruce B. On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Chris A Mattmann wrote: > Hey Brian, > > That sounds Perfect! I like the idea of simply creating a RunnableInstance > and think it fits the architecture well! > +50 to proc

Re: Workflow Task/Condition Instances...

2012-11-08 Thread Chris A Mattmann
Thanks dude will scope now! On Nov 8, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Brian Foster wrote: > hey chris, > > i got the initial changes to Workflow, WorkflowInstance, and > WorkflowProcessor in... https://reviews.apache.org/r/7944/ ... let me know > what you think... lol > > -brian > > > On Nov 7, 2012, at

Re: Workflow Task/Condition Instances...

2012-11-08 Thread Chris A Mattmann
Hey Brian, That sounds Perfect! I like the idea of simply creating a RunnableInstance and think it fits the architecture well! +50 to proceed down that path. Cheers, Chris On Nov 8, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Brian Foster wrote: > > hey chris, > > I think i work this out... i'm gonna create a Runnabl

Review Request: Purposed Changes to Workflow, WorkflowInstance, and WorkflowProcessor

2012-11-08 Thread brian Foster
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7944/ --- Review request for oodt, Chris Mattmann and Paul Ramirez. Description --- M