Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release

2013-06-27 Thread Khudikyan, Shakeh E (398J)
> >> -Original Message- >> From: Mattmann, Chris A (398J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov] >> Sent: Friday, 21 June 2013 4:04 AM >> To: dev@oodt.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release >> >> Hi Shakeh, >> >

RE: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release

2013-06-27 Thread Gavin McDonald
I'll have this done by tomorrow end. Gav... > -Original Message- > From: Mattmann, Chris A (398J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov] > Sent: Friday, 21 June 2013 4:04 AM > To: dev@oodt.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release > > Hi Sh

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release

2013-06-20 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:03 AM To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release >Hi Chris, > >We need to make sure we update all the package.xml for PEAR. I know >filemgr, sso, and balance each have one. > >Just made OODT-633 - Update PEAR p

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release

2013-06-19 Thread Khudikyan, Shakeh E (398J)
Hi Chris, We need to make sure we update all the package.xml for PEAR. I know filemgr, sso, and balance each have one. Just made OODT-633 - Update PEAR package.xml . -Shakeh On 6/16/13 8:25 AM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote: >Hey Guys, > >I've got

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release

2013-06-16 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
y-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Date: Sunday, June 16, 2013 10:24 AM To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release >Nice one Chris. >Out of interest, is there any reason for intermittent failures for the >Jenkins builds? I see them every now and the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OODT 0.6 release

2013-06-16 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Nice one Chris. Out of interest, is there any reason for intermittent failures for the Jenkins builds? I see them every now and then and wondered. +1 to RC. On Sunday, June 16, 2013, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I've got some free time and would like to roll the 0.6 release. If > there's