In that case, it is an issue.
Can someone else also make comments about the impact of removing the
factory.destroy()?
I know the Oozie team at Y! made substantial investigations in the DB access
layer.
Regards,
Mohammad
On Monday, June 9, 2014 4:44 PM, bowen zhang
Was the slides updated in slideshare and communicated through meet up email?
Regards,
Mohammad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026160#comment-14026160
]
Shwetha G S commented on OOZIE-1532:
Purge configuration is at oozie server level and
Thanks for the reminder Mohammad. Uploaded them on slideshare and will
email now
On 6/9/14, 11:26 PM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote:
Was the slides updated in slideshare and communicated through meet up
email?
Regards,
Mohammad
Hi all,
Thanks to all those who attended the Meetup. I have uploaded the slides on
Slideshare (see links below) for reference and sharing with others.
http://www.slideshare.net/sportymona/oozie-meetup-slides-jun-3rd-2014
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryota Egashira updated OOZIE-1492:
--
Attachment: OOZIE-1492-v10.patch
Make sure HA works with HCat and SLA notifications
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026244#comment-14026244
]
Shwetha G S commented on OOZIE-1699:
Since this is already committed, should I put up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026276#comment-14026276
]
Shwetha G S commented on OOZIE-1778:
Isn't the issue because of asynchronous commands?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026285#comment-14026285
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1492:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-1492
Cleaning local git workspace
See https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/1296/
--
[...truncated 9001 lines...]
[INFO] already added, skipping
[INFO] share already added, skipping
[INFO] share/lib already added, skipping
[INFO] already added, skipping
[INFO] share
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026287#comment-14026287
]
Shwetha G S commented on OOZIE-1654:
I have seen cases where the configs(read in code)
ADARSHA HOTA created OOZIE-1874:
---
Summary: ./oozied.sh: line 104:
/usr/local/hadoop/oozie-4.0.1/distro/src/main/oozie-server/bin/catalina.sh: No
such file or directory
Key: OOZIE-1874
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ADARSHA HOTA updated OOZIE-1874:
Priority: Blocker (was: Minor)
./oozied.sh: line 104:
I don't think it will be wise to remove that line as factory.close() is
required to cleanup and release resources. Since the exception is during
shutdown and is just logged and does not affect the shutdown I don't think
you should be worrying about removing it.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:24 PM,
no, the exception will stop the shutdown. It will make oozie unable to shutdown.
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:46 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy
rohini.adi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it will be wise to remove that line as factory.close() is
required to cleanup and release resources. Since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bowen Zhang resolved OOZIE-1587.
Resolution: Invalid
I will be merging this feature into execution_order with oozie-1319. So, we no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bowen Zhang resolved OOZIE-1595.
Resolution: Invalid
merging it into execution_order after resolving oozie-1319
Document coord
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bowen Zhang resolved OOZIE-1305.
Resolution: Invalid
merging into oozie-1319
coordinator job should have an option to recover
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bowen Zhang resolved OOZIE-1594.
Resolution: Invalid
will merge the feature into execution_order after oozie-1319.
Implement
Bowen Zhang created OOZIE-1875:
--
Summary: Add NONE to coordinator job execution_order
Key: OOZIE-1875
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1875
Project: Oozie
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bowen Zhang resolved OOZIE-1431.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Will create new issue if enough users ask for it.
Dataset frequencies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026975#comment-14026975
]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-1865:
--
So if I'm understanding correctly, you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027078#comment-14027078
]
Purshotam Shah commented on OOZIE-1654:
---
{quote}
We should give preference to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027094#comment-14027094
]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-1654:
--
{quote}It doesn't make sense to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027119#comment-14027119
]
Purshotam Shah commented on OOZIE-1654:
---
{code}
int ret =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027138#comment-14027138
]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-1654:
--
If we give preference to the newer one, then
If anyone wants more context on my Oozie HA slides, this blog post has
mostly the same information but is easier to follow on your own:
http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2014/03/inside-apache-oozie-ha/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Mona Chitnis m...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027212#comment-14027212
]
Purshotam Shah commented on OOZIE-1654:
---
I see.. In that case we can add both
Issue Subscription
Filter: Oozie Patch Available (36 issues)
Subscriber: ooziedaily
Key Summary
OOZIE-1861 Pig action should work with tez mode
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1861
OOZIE-1860 Oozie job mapper launch fails due to null value returned from
action
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Purshotam Shah updated OOZIE-1869:
--
Attachment: OOZIE-1869-V1.patch
Sharelib update shows vip/load balancer address as one of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027327#comment-14027327
]
Purshotam Shah commented on OOZIE-1869:
---
Minor change, no UTC.
Sharelib update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027351#comment-14027351
]
Purshotam Shah commented on OOZIE-1778:
---
{quote}
Isn't the issue because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Azrael updated OOZIE-1654:
--
Attachment: OOZIE-1654.2.patch
Address comments and rebased.
I linked review board.
bq.It doesn't make sense
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22451/
---
Review request for oozie.
Bugs: OOZIE-1654
See https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/1297/changes
Changes:
[rkanter] OOZIE-1715 Distributed ID sequence for HA (puru via rkanter)
--
[...truncated 9694 lines...]
[INFO] share already added, skipping
[INFO] share/lib already added,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027415#comment-14027415
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1869:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-1869
Cleaning local git workspace
36 matches
Mail list logo
