Re: Your project uses a possibly LGPL dependency: com.icegreen.greenmail:greenmail

Same with Aapche OODT. We use it soley in the test to ensure our IMAP handling works. --k On 2014-07-14, at 1:21 PM, Robert Kanter wrote: > Thanks for letting us know Steve. > In Oozie, it's only included as a test scope dependency and used only for > unit tests, so I think we're good here. >

Re: Your project uses a possibly LGPL dependency: com.icegreen.greenmail:greenmail

Thanks for letting us know Steve. In Oozie, it's only included as a test scope dependency and used only for unit tests, so I think we're good here. On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Thanks Steve. For clarity: > > This message announces a license switch for Greenmail -- > ht

Re: Your project uses a possibly LGPL dependency: com.icegreen.greenmail:greenmail

Thanks Steve. For clarity: This message announces a license switch for Greenmail -- http://sourceforge.net/p/greenmail/mailman/message/58953/ However, some/most/all of the src license headers are still labeled as LGPL. There would also be general questions about the license switch -- were all nece

Your project uses a possibly LGPL dependency: com.icegreen.greenmail:greenmail

Hi, my name is Steve Rowe, and I'm a member of the Apache Lucene PMC. We recently discovered that the "greenmail" Java library, which declares its license as ASLv2 in its POM and elsewhere, has LGPL license headers in its source code files. In response the Lucene project reverted a recent commit