Installer-free Tomcat plugin

2007-09-29 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Ever since Dario pointed out that OpenJPA doesn't need a javaagent when on Java6, I've been wanting to try to get the Tomcat plugin working without the installer. The two main tasks are getting OpenEJB to run on Java6 and finding a work around for the bad annotation-api.jar in Tomcat. Thi

[RESULTS] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

2007-09-29 Thread David Blevins
It's official! The vote as passed with 10 +1s and no other votes: +1s: Alan D. Cabrera Dain Sundstrom David Blevins Jacek Laskowski Jeff Genender Karan Malhi Kevan Miller Manu George Mohammad Nour El-Din Pavel Volkovitskiy I pushed the binaries out and updated the download page; both should s

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

2007-09-29 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 29, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Sep 29, 2007, at 3:42 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Sep 29, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: I was hoping that Geronimo would be able to use 3.0-beta-1. However, without revision 580227 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc? rev=580227&view

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

2007-09-29 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 29, 2007, at 3:42 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Sep 29, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: I was hoping that Geronimo would be able to use 3.0-beta-1. However, without revision 580227 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc? rev=580227&view=rev), I'm pretty sure this won't be the case. So,

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

2007-09-29 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 On 9/27/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok! It's taken quite a bit of mucking around is it's our first > release out of the 3.x tree. But at long last we are at the finished > with packaging and prep. > > Assembled "distro" directory to be copied to /www/www.apache.org/dist/

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

2007-09-29 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 29, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: I was hoping that Geronimo would be able to use 3.0-beta-1. However, without revision 580227 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc? rev=580227&view=rev), I'm pretty sure this won't be the case. So, I'm +0. /me gently nudges kevan this way http://sv

Re: 3.0-beta-1 uses 3.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-09-29 Thread Jacek Laskowski
Hi, The top-level pom.xml doesn't include the license header too. I'm fixing it now. I don't know whether we should call a vote again. I hope not. Jacek On 9/29/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Just spot it while building 3.0-beta-1: > > [INFO] [dependency:copy {execution

3.0-beta-1 uses 3.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-09-29 Thread Jacek Laskowski
Hi, Just spot it while building 3.0-beta-1: [INFO] [dependency:copy {execution: copy}] [INFO] Configured Artifact: org.apache.openejb:openejb-javaagent:3.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT:jar [INFO] snapshot org.apache.openejb:openejb-javaagent:3.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from codehaus-snapshot [IN

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

2007-09-29 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 9/29/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was hoping that Geronimo would be able to use 3.0-beta-1. However, > without revision 580227 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc? > rev=580227&view=rev), I'm pretty sure this won't be the case. So, I'm > +0. Hey Kevan, don't worry. The fix will be

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

2007-09-29 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 27, 2007, at 1:45 AM, David Blevins wrote: Ok! It's taken quite a bit of mucking around is it's our first release out of the 3.x tree. But at long last we are at the finished with packaging and prep. Assembled "distro" directory to be copied to /www/www.apache.org/ dist/openejb/:

New Doc: Annotations, XML and Defaults

2007-09-29 Thread David Blevins
Took a bit of time digging through our AnnotationDeployer and the various annotation classes and our Jaxb tree to line this all up. http://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJB/annotations-xml-and-defaults.html Not very wordy, meant as a reference. -David