Re: @Asynchronous work

2010-07-21 Thread David Blevins
On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Ivan wrote: > Or maybe we could have a reference in the ThreadContext for the next > ThreadContext in the invocation chain ? Hmm. Maybe we just go simple and hook the wasCancelCalled method up to its own ThreadLocal. Having more thread locals is generally frowned

Re: @Asynchronous work

2010-07-21 Thread Ivan
Or maybe we could have a reference in the ThreadContext for the next ThreadContext in the invocation chain ? 2010/7/21 Ivan > Hi, David : >Thanks for the info, it almost covers all the implementation details ;-) >Currently, I have moved all the asynchronous related code logic out from >

Re: Clustering OpenEJB with Hazelcast

2010-07-21 Thread David Jencks
On Jul 21, 2010, at 1:08 AM, romain.manni-bucau wrote: > > Hi, > > Hazelcast needs a javax.resource.spi.ConnectionManager to create its > ConnectionFactory. > I don't know where i could get the good object in openEJB. > Is hazelcast packaged as a standard j2ca connector? david jencks >

Re: Clustering OpenEJB with Hazelcast

2010-07-21 Thread romain.manni-bucau
Hi, Hazelcast needs a javax.resource.spi.ConnectionManager to create its ConnectionFactory. I don't know where i could get the good object in openEJB. - http://rniamo.o-n.fr http://rniamo.o-n.fr -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Clustering-OpenEJB-with-

Re: @Asynchronous work

2010-07-21 Thread Ivan
Hi, David : Thanks for the info, it almost covers all the implementation details ;-) Currently, I have moved all the asynchronous related code logic out from those ***Container. While considering how to implement the sessioncontext.wasCancellCalled method, I got an issue. Seems that the place