Sure I can do the same for Geronimo and as it looks like by reading
Marius' reply, it shouldn't be much of a hassle.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:07 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> about the hudson maven support and why you don't want to use it :-)
>
> I think that the built-in support firs
On 24 September 2010 22:35, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:48 AM, dsh wrote:
>
>> So what do we need to do to get the Hudson build for OpenEJB up and
>> running. I am still a little confused about what the missing pieces
>> are and what to do next...
>
> Don't know anything about
about the hudson maven support and why you don't want to use it :-)
I think that the built-in support first builds the maven project and then if it
succeeds copies the snapshots to the deployment location. This is a no-no
because the resulting snapshots aren't timestamped. If you use mvn clean
Okay so I'll do the research as soon as I have some spare cycles.
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:48 AM, dsh wrote:
>
>> So what do we need to do to get the Hudson build for OpenEJB up and
>> running. I am still a little confused ab
On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:26 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> I'm too thought about
>> something similar and was wondering what the starting point would be -
>> there should be some kind of a DI container and the rest would be
>> injected at appropriate places. Is XBean what fullfils the
>> requiremen
On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:48 AM, dsh wrote:
> So what do we need to do to get the Hudson build for OpenEJB up and
> running. I am still a little confused about what the missing pieces
> are and what to do next...
Don't know anything about hudson either. Goal is to have OpenEJB build and
publish s
So what do we need to do to get the Hudson build for OpenEJB up and
running. I am still a little confused about what the missing pieces
are and what to do next...
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Added you to the right unix group.
>
> Saw a presentation by Ja
Added you to the right unix group.
Saw a presentation by Jason on Maven 3 and he mentioned in that session that
they don't use the maven specific support in Hudson. Seemed to indicate that
instead they use a plain java project. Not sure on any other details, but
heads up.
-David
On Sep 21,
Hey!
Can you guys answer me if that new release will support JPA 2.0?
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Time-for-a-3-1-3-release-tp2550227p2552517.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi David,
Providing releases is definitely an area i never really helped (other than
looking/testing binaries).
BTW, i don't actually know the steps, nor the work involved.
Regardless that point, it seems interesting and i'd like to help in the
future.
Can you give me some links or anything else
Hi André,
David can probably give more details, but in my opinion, JPA 2.0 will only
be supported in the trunk (OpenEJB 3.2.x releases).
Basically, OpenEJB 3.1.x is Java EE 5 compliant and OpenEJB 3.2.x will be
Java EE 6.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.na
Hi Andy,
I don't really know if our openejb-axis2 module is heavy used.
I got the chance to dig into our openejb-cxf but never looked at
openejb-axis2.
As far as I know, Geronimo uses Axis 2 as the default JAX-WS provider. So,
this module may be relevant in that context.
Jean-Louis
--
View t
12 matches
Mail list logo
