Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more
coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
The tool will download all the archives from the maven staging repo, unpack
them and create a little report of what is there:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:45 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Wed Sep 28 07:45:20 2011
New Revision: 1176770
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176770view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
On 28.09.2011 09:53, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:45 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Wed Sep 28 07:45:20 2011
New Revision: 1176770
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176770view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
Before I take the next step action, I wonder that those license issues must
be fixed, right ? Also, for each binary file, only one LICENSE file is
required in the META-INF directory, which contains all the licenses, all
those license files,
e.g.
On Sep 28, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Ivan wrote:
Before I take the next step action, I wonder that those license issues must
be fixed, right ? Also, for each binary file, only one LICENSE file is
required in the META-INF directory, which contains all the licenses, all
those license files,
e.g.
Just reverted, but shouldn't we really have a DescriptionType[] for this?
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1176770-openejb-trunk-openejb3-container-openejb-jee-src-main-java-org-apache-openejba-tp3850280p3850508.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev
On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:25 AM, AndyG wrote:
Just reverted, but shouldn't we really have a DescriptionType[] for this?
I haven't looked closely at the schema for DataSource. Some of the other
description types allow for localized descriptions. If this one does too,
maybe we should use the
about jaxb accessor:
jaxb ri implementation create inner class to acess faster to
properties/fields. In our case maybe the creation is longer than the
accesses (used only @ start up).
Supposing we are using the RI implementation of JAXB (i think we are) we can
maybe follow this idea:
// context
Also interested to get the answer ;-)
2011/9/28 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many
more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked
On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hmm, seems that I did not generate a source tar/zip, not sure whether it is
must, as it is just for Geronimo dependency.
Yes. It's required.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
Good for everyone to review (esp.
Great reminder Kevan.
As always i would say.
Gonna read It again quickly.
Jean Louis
Le 28 sept. 2011 19:15, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hmm, seems that I did not generate a source tar/zip, not sure whether it
is
must, as it is
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more
coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
You're
On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
When I hacked up the Remote with zip adapter I intended to
merge it into the remote adapter - along the lines of: check to see if TomEE
is running on the port specified in arquillian.xml. If it is, just deploy
straight to it. If not, go
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
When I hacked up the Remote with zip adapter I intended to
merge it into the remote adapter - along the lines of: check to see if
TomEE
is running on the
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
I was thinking it would be cool to try and extend either the test suite or
the Arquillian test runner somehow so the test then runs against all the
adapters in one go.
I was going to do the Maven profile bit first, as that should be
Cancel the vote for the next try.
2011/9/29 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many
more
16 matches
Mail list logo