Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread David Blevins
Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help. The tool will download all the archives from the maven staging repo, unpack them and create a little report of what is there:

Re: svn commit: r1176770 - /openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/DataSource.java

2011-09-28 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:45 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote: Author: andygumbrecht Date: Wed Sep 28 07:45:20 2011 New Revision: 1176770 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176770view=rev Log: Fix typo Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1176770 - /openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/DataSource.java

2011-09-28 Thread Andy
On 28.09.2011 09:53, David Blevins wrote: On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:45 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote: Author: andygumbrecht Date: Wed Sep 28 07:45:20 2011 New Revision: 1176770 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176770view=rev Log: Fix typo Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread Ivan
Before I take the next step action, I wonder that those license issues must be fixed, right ? Also, for each binary file, only one LICENSE file is required in the META-INF directory, which contains all the licenses, all those license files, e.g.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 28, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Ivan wrote: Before I take the next step action, I wonder that those license issues must be fixed, right ? Also, for each binary file, only one LICENSE file is required in the META-INF directory, which contains all the licenses, all those license files, e.g.

Re: svn commit: r1176770 - /openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/DataSource.java

2011-09-28 Thread AndyG
Just reverted, but shouldn't we really have a DescriptionType[] for this? -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1176770-openejb-trunk-openejb3-container-openejb-jee-src-main-java-org-apache-openejba-tp3850280p3850508.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev

Re: svn commit: r1176770 - /openejb/trunk/openejb3/container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/DataSource.java

2011-09-28 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:25 AM, AndyG wrote: Just reverted, but shouldn't we really have a DescriptionType[] for this? I haven't looked closely at the schema for DataSource. Some of the other description types allow for localized descriptions. If this one does too, maybe we should use the

Re: Memory tweaking

2011-09-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
about jaxb accessor: jaxb ri implementation create inner class to acess faster to properties/fields. In our case maybe the creation is longer than the accesses (used only @ start up). Supposing we are using the RI implementation of JAXB (i think we are) we can maybe follow this idea: // context

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Also interested to get the answer ;-) 2011/9/28 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Ivan wrote: Hmm, seems that I did not generate a source tar/zip, not sure whether it is must, as it is just for Geronimo dependency. Yes. It's required. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain Good for everyone to review (esp.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Great reminder Kevan. As always i would say. Gonna read It again quickly. Jean Louis Le 28 sept. 2011 19:15, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com a écrit : On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Ivan wrote: Hmm, seems that I did not generate a source tar/zip, not sure whether it is must, as it is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help. You're

Re: Arquillian adapters

2011-09-28 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: When I hacked up the Remote with zip adapter I intended to merge it into the remote adapter - along the lines of: check to see if TomEE is running on the port specified in arquillian.xml. If it is, just deploy straight to it. If not, go

Re: Arquillian adapters

2011-09-28 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: When I hacked up the Remote with zip adapter I intended to merge it into the remote adapter - along the lines of: check to see if TomEE is running on the

Re: Arquillian adapters

2011-09-28 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: I was thinking it would be cool to try and extend either the test suite or the Arquillian test runner somehow so the test then runs against all the adapters in one go. I was going to do the Maven profile bit first, as that should be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

2011-09-28 Thread Ivan
Cancel the vote for the next try. 2011/9/29 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more