Don't know if that is due to my environment, but I have some arquilian
tests failing.
I notice as well 3 files containing SNAPSHOT instead of the beta-2.
./examples/cdi-alternative-and-stereotypes/README.md:Apache OpenEJB
4.0.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOTbuild: 20111030-07:54
On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Don't know if that is due to my environment, but I have some arquilian
tests failing.
Can you paste the error? They pass in buildbot and on my machine, but that
doesn't mean there might not be an issue.
I notice as well 3 files
On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi David,
Did you by any chance run the legal tool you wrote around the time of the
last release? I remember finding it really useful. I'm happy to give it a
run and post up the results if you give me a couple of pointers.
I'm just
How was this report generated? Can it be generated by everybody?
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:02 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi David,
Did you by any chance run the legal tool you wrote around the time
Andy +0
Two test failures. Not dug in to the cause, so if anyone can see something
in the traces that may have something to do with my setup then let me know.
Using Win7 Pro 64bit
---
Test set:
Hi Jean-Louis,
we could be using the sonar.exclusions property per sub-module as part
of the module's pom.xml. Please have a look at the following thread to
get the idea.
More or less the same as Andy, but I'm on windows and my computer is still
very slow.
Dunno if that is the reason.
Jean-Louis
2012/1/10 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
Andy +0
Two test failures. Not dug in to the cause, so if anyone can see something
in the traces that may have
Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
differences between:
* Apache OpenEJB
* Apache TomEE
* Apache TomEE+
and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
contain a details link for each one mentioned above.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at
Stupid question. Why do we test locally? Can't we get VM images of the
most important operating systems for our testing that could be set
back to a canonical snapshot each time we intend to run a release
cycle?
I have such an environment at home but can't run it 7x24h cause of the
energy costs
to be sure it works for eveybody?
if we all use a vm it will work for eveybody and we can miss some important
issues.
- Romain
2012/1/10 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
Stupid question. Why do we test locally? Can't we get VM images of the
most important operating systems for our testing
IMO we should be testing specific environments and not local setups.
What's makes a local setup preferable over a canonical and clean setup
that can be reinitialized prior to each release engeneering cycle?
AFAIK the issues reported might be related to Windoze platforms. A
platform that seems to
if we can have win vm too +1
window$ is not so used excepted on dev computers :(
- Romain
2012/1/10 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
IMO we should be testing specific environments and not local setups.
What's makes a local setup preferable over a canonical and clean setup
that can be
I think its a good idea. Although, I would prefer to compare TomEE and
TomEE+ and not even mention OpenEJB on the page.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:45 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
differences between:
* Apache
Yes... this is the same issue I reported some days ago for the trunk.
I have the same issue in my windows and linux machines.
[]s,
Thiago.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
if we can have win vm too +1
window$ is not so used excepted on dev
Darn.
I might be able to dig in on Saturday or Sunday, but not likely sooner. If
anyone out there who has the problem is able to dig a little it'd be very
appreciated.
-David
On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:36 AM, AndyG wrote:
Andy +0
Two test failures. Not dug in to the cause, so if anyone
I think in theory, if each one of us has an MSDN account, we might be
able to have a windows VM that we could share amongst OEJB devs. I
think the only thing that's probably prohibited is making them
available in a public place such as people.a.o.
On the other hand I'd like to understand why
+1, great idea Daniel !
Jean-Louis
2012/1/10 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
differences between:
* Apache OpenEJB
* Apache TomEE
* Apache TomEE+
and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
+1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
in the comparison matrix).
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, great idea Daniel !
Jean-Louis
2012/1/10 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
Does it make sense
Hi,
who uses Mac OS X (which version) to compile OEJB? If I do a mvn
-Dassemble clean install I am getting strange popup/dialog windows.
They are disappearing pretty fast so I am not 100% certain whether
those are the this app was downloaded from the internet, do you
really want to execute it
Ok I've thrown Camtasia at the damn thing (I knew one they spending
the money for the license pays back...) and the dialog says: Do you
want the application 'java' to accept incoming network connections
which makes sense cause the popup window appears while executing
tests.
Unfortunatly I didn't
Going to take a look on my Windows machine here - I'll shout if I can see
what the problem is.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:45 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Darn.
I might be able to dig in on Saturday or Sunday, but not likely sooner.
If anyone out there who has the
This seems to solve the issue (had to self-sign the java binary):
-
http://blog.avisi.nl/2011/12/28/mac-os-x-firewall-accept-incoming-network-connections/
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:36 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok I've thrown Camtasia at the damn thing (I knew
I added a system property: openejb.server.debug=true to
RemoteTomEEContainer, and I was then able to hook up a remote debugger to
the server. Stopping in
org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.util.ServiceLoader, it appear that
the JUnitTestRunning is being picked up from 2 jars - one in the
23 matches
Mail list logo
