Looks good. Can you center the alignment of the Tomcat, OpenEJB and
TomEE+ column? What about TomEE? Do we want to compare TomEE against
TomEE+?
Would the look & feel be nicer if the title row of the table would
have a light grey background?
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David
On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>
>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>> in the comparison matrix).
>
[...]
> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java
> EE sp
Hi,
trying to keep the general buildbot issue (aka windoze based OpenEJB
builds) seperated from the release vote thread.
To me it looks like JUnit XML files, which do have a very long file
name because of the long Java package names, can't be deleted prior to
each new build cycle on Windoze. Thus
Still the same, something has changed since yesterday morning that is causing
the test tomee to try and bind to port 0 - Trying to figure out what.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4292230.html
Sent from t
The port should be 10080 by default.
can you check in :
openejb-trunk/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-remote/src/test/resources/arquillian.xml
- Romain
2012/1/13 AndyG
> I am now getting the following, is there a missing or modified default port
> configuration somewhere?:
>
> Running org.a
I am now getting the following, is there a missing or modified default port
configuration somewhere?:
Running org.apache.openejb.arquillian.session.SessionScopeTest
[] START SERVER
OPENEJB_HOME =
D:\tmp\arquillian-apache-tomee\apache-tomee-plus-1.0.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT
SYSTEM_INFO = Java 1.6.0_30; W
