In the process of checking this out I have put the following back into
NewLoaderLogic.
public static final String ADDITIONAL_EXCLUDES =
System.getProperty(openejb.additional.exclude);
public static final String ADDITIONAL_INCLUDE =
System.getProperty(openejb.additional.include);
I know it was
i removed them because it was complicated to use in real life and a file
was far more easy.
however the include part can be interesting but i didnt know if addind an
include file means to ignore the exclude one or not. Maybe something to
do.
Any opinion is welcome about it.
- Romain
2012/2/1
for jira i needed to tweak conf/exclusions.list file (some can be
duplicated since i didn't clean it):
google-
saxon-
joda-time-
wstx-asl
crowd-
mail-
xstream-
osworkflow-
javacvs-
org.apache.felix
glue-
xalan-
jai_
bcvprov-
axis-
jfreechart-
xercesImpl-
js-
atlassian-
crowd-
entity
jira-
lucene-
David Blevins-2 wrote
That definitely seems to be the case.
I would focus debugging efforts at line 87 of
org.apache.openejb.cli.Bootstrap
OK, this is more than likely due to the windows service (Commons Daemon)
already having jars on the classpath. From the get go
great!
- Romain
2012/2/1 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
So, it turns out to be BasicURLClassPath.addJarsToPath was not doing any
kind
of URL checking.
This method is called from several locations, and the subsequent call to
dir.list was/is returning file names with varying case -
+1
Of course if that is one of my idea.
Just to argue a bit.
With Apache TomEE (it was also the case before), a lot of companies or
people are using OpenEJB/TomEE in production.
It would be great to have kinda Apache TomEE server, we can use to publish
important releases or security/bugfixes.
Great. In this pretend app though we should have it setup so none of the app
jars are in the excludes list so we are tracking our actual startup time with a
decent sized app.
If we need to rename all the jars to superbiz-*.jar when we add them to the
war, that'd be one way to do it.
In the
We'll definitely want to make sure we update the tck setup as well. It had
quite a lot of references to the openejb webapp.
There's a bunch in the groovy classes for setting up classpaths and some in the
VmDeploymentManager.
-David
On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
This sounds like a great feature.
My gut instinct is that maybe it should be disabled by default and something we
encourage people to enable.
What do others think?
-David
On Feb 1, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
+1
Of course if that is one of my idea.
Just to argue a bit.
so maybe jira is a bad example it is pretty big (100M)
but scanning should really be enhanced.
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Great. In this pretend app though we should have it setup so none of the
app jars are in the excludes list so we are tracking our actual
i would like to see it activated by default.
a little timeout (3s?)
a thread ran in the configuration factory
and the result get (through a future) in the assembler (to avoid to wait)?
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
This sounds like a great feature.
My gut
On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
i would like to see it activated by default.
a little timeout (3s?)
a thread ran in the configuration factory
and the result get (through a future) in the assembler (to avoid to wait)?
If we did have it on by default, should
already added a version but not as a service.
it can be desactivated using configuration factory offline mode or a
dedicated system property. The downloadable url and check url are
configurable through system properties.
I use maven (repo1) to check the latest version.
- Romain
2012/2/1 David
i didnt find it in VmDeploymentManager.
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
We'll definitely want to make sure we update the tck setup as well. It
had quite a lot of references to the openejb webapp.
There's a bunch in the groovy classes for setting up classpaths and
On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
already added a version but not as a service.
it can be desactivated using configuration factory offline mode or a
dedicated system property. The downloadable url and check url are
configurable through system properties.
I use maven
it doesn't really match,
it is nice to get the info in test mode too so it should be in the core.
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
already added a version but not as a service.
it can be desactivated using
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
it doesn't really match,
it is nice to get the info in test mode too so it should be in the core.
Having it on for a test would seem to be a really bad idea. We'd be doing 100+
checks per build per person on our own build alone.
shouldn't cost anything
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
it doesn't really match,
it is nice to get the info in test mode too so it should be in the core.
Having it on for a test would seem to be a really
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
shouldn't cost anything
My preference would be for it not being enabled by default for testing and for
getting out of core and as a separate jar. Or at the very least a separate
class very decoupled form Assembler/ConfigurationFactory.
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:29 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
shouldn't cost anything
My preference would be for it not being enabled by default for testing and
for getting out of core and as a separate jar. Or at the very least a
separate
because it was visible.
if we manage to do it in parallel it will not be visible so nobody will
shout, no?
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:29 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
shouldn't cost
On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
i didnt find it in VmDeploymentManager.
That's fine. Did you try running a few TCK tests to verify the changes?
-David
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
We'll definitely want to make sure we update the
[yet another email I found sitting open and not sent]
Really great, Gerhard!
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
in addition to [1] i also created [2]. currently [3] just builds the
project with mvn clean install (and without running the tests) as soon as a
snapshot
yep with jenkins notifications can be as input and output events.
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
[yet another email I found sitting open and not sent]
Really great, Gerhard!
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
in addition to [1] i also created
24 matches
Mail list logo
