I created this page and made it publicly editable:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMEE/PoweredBy
Neale, why don't you kick it off with some text.
We can of course refine as we go.
-David
On Jun 3, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Neale Rudd wrote:
Just a few notes here...
Tomcat uses
Hi David,
Could you elaborate a bit more, please?
I've never seen any issue with @Local.
Jean-Louis
2012/6/4 David Blevins (JIRA) j...@apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
David Blevins
in glassfish you can do
@Stateless
@Local
public class Foo {
}
- Romain
2012/6/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
Hi David,
Could you elaborate a bit more, please?
I've never seen any issue with @Local.
Jean-Louis
2012/6/4 David Blevins (JIRA) j...@apache.org
[
OK, +1
JLouis
2012/6/4 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
+1
Le 4 juin 2012 07:43, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Jun 3, 2012, at 9:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I'd say +1 for contribs (= extensions to what we provide) but here
that's
more /osgi no?
Having frequent releases maintenance on 1.0.x and 4.0.x is definitely
required for end users.
David's rule seems a bit difficult, but let's try it. We will not merge
everything but we want to get fixes in, so a JIRA must be created. In that
context, I think an SVN hook would be great to ensure
+1
2012/6/4 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 3, 2012, at 9:56 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Whatever we have to do, we need a logo (better if it is quickly).
Any procedure?
- Romain
Le 4 juin 2012 04:32, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit
:
Do we want
well,
the issue i saw was if we look to current trunk we should almost backport
all fixes
- Romain
2012/6/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
Having frequent releases maintenance on 1.0.x and 4.0.x is definitely
required for end users.
David's rule seems a bit difficult, but let's
I'll run this.
How about we do a 40 day run. I'll put all submissions up somewhere and we
can vote on them.
Comments/complains welcome.
David - can the winning logo get some recognition somewhere? ie: a logo
designed by... note somewhere in the docs?
I think it's really important to get
Thanks David, I'll add to this tomorrow and try to make it like the Tomcat
one.
Would be great to see some of the users out there add some submissions if
they are using TomEE for their live sites.
I'll write an email on the users@ list tomorrow re that.
- Original Message -
From:
is 40 a legal slot?
can't it be 7? (with JL we have a conference ton the 12th ;))
- Romain
2012/6/4 Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net
I'll run this.
How about we do a 40 day run. I'll put all submissions up somewhere and
we can vote on them.
Comments/complains welcome.
David - can the
Time to decide on a logo:
7 days? 40 days?
Conference on the 12th!
Vote!
Either way is ok for me running the contest, just wanted to give you guys
some time ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June
But if it's 7 days - don't just vote on the days - get some votes on the
paw-print or some submissions in. I'll discuss it all with David after 6
days.
- Original Message -
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 4:47 AM
oki, do what is possible, just it had be cool to get the logo for this event
- Romain
2012/6/4 Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net
But if it's 7 days - don't just vote on the days - get some votes on the
paw-print or some submissions in. I'll discuss it all with David after 6
days.
-
As for me: +1 on the pawprint+EE submitted by Romain 1of2 (other Romain
clouded-tiger-stripe thing is a definite no).
Hmm... my vote probably doesn't count :-) I'll ignore it.
- Original Message -
From: Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June
(SUBVOTE) Romain's paw-print logo to become official logo in 6 days
Options:
- +1 for paw-print
- -1 for paw-print
- submit a different logo
- vote for 6 days and wait
- vote for 40 days and wait
If we get a higher vote for the pawprint sum(+1/-1) vs (waitFor40days) we'll
just go with it -
Romain - Can you repost the pawprint so everyone has a chance to see that
again?
Anyone else - plenty of time - vote for 40 days, or -1 or +1 this logo.
- Original Message -
From: Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:05 AM
Subject:
all is here http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/graphic/
- Romain
2012/6/4 Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net
Romain - Can you repost the pawprint so everyone has a chance to see that
again?
Anyone else - plenty of time - vote for 40 days, or -1 or +1 this logo.
- Original Message
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Neale Rudd wrote:
If we get a higher vote for the pawprint sum(+1/-1) vs (waitFor40days) we'll
just go with it - pending David's decision of course.
All things are project decisions of course. I get one vote like everyone else
:)
My vote would be for the 40
Btw, GMail thinks that you are writing in Korean... ;)
2012/6/4 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
all is here http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/graphic/
- Romain
2012/6/4 Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net
Romain - Can you repost the pawprint so everyone has a chance to see that
i globally agree even if i would have had it on the 12th.
- Romain
2012/6/4 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Neale Rudd wrote:
If we get a higher vote for the pawprint sum(+1/-1) vs (waitFor40days)
we'll just go with it - pending David's decision of
Vote has passed with 6 +1 votes;
Voter:
David Blevins
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Karan Singh Malhi
Alan D Cabrera
Jonathan Gallimore
Romain Manni-Bucau
Thanks to everybody and sorry for multiple re-tags before this take.
I'll continue the release process.
Special thank to David for his advices.
-
On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
the issue i saw was if we look to current trunk we should almost backport
all fixes
There would definitely be a lot of merging. We probably should have created
the branch much sooner.
Alternatively we could create a 1.0.x branch from
do we have a target for 1.1? maybe we can wait it?
- Romain
2012/6/5 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
the issue i saw was if we look to current trunk we should almost backport
all fixes
There would definitely be a lot of
On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
do we have a target for 1.1? maybe we can wait it?
Can you clarify? Not sure I understood.
-David
2012/6/5 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
the issue i saw was if we
if we release the 1.1 next mounth we can create a 1.1.x and forget the 1.0
i think
- Romain
2012/6/5 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
do we have a target for 1.1? maybe we can wait it?
Can you clarify? Not sure I understood.
On Jun 4, 2012, at 5:17 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Jun 5 00:17:14 2012
New Revision: 1346196
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346196view=rev
Log:
we were firing too early the process injection target event
Sounds like a bug fix. If so, we
waiting tcks ;)
- Romain
2012/6/5 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 4, 2012, at 5:17 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Jun 5 00:17:14 2012
New Revision: 1346196
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346196view=rev
Log:
we were firing
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:50 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:50:30 2012
New Revision: 1346120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346120view=rev
Log:
@Local on class with no interfaces
We definitely do not want an example that teaches this
In light of the recent validation failure on deployment, there's a clear
feature we've been needing that would be great to add.
The console should be able to deploy apps. When there are validation
failures/warnings those would be listed in nice yellow and red boxes that are
clickable. When
On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:50 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:50:30 2012
New Revision: 1346120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346120view=rev
Log:
@Local on class with no interfaces
We
30 matches
Mail list logo
