Re: More info on deploying an app on ROOT

2012-12-30 Thread Enrico Olivelli
may I create an issue in JIRA for this problem ? it actually blocks me, I cannot upgrade apps on production environment without refactoring file system layouts thank you Enrico Il 28/12/2012 15:53, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea ha scritto: Hi all, I can deploy a webapp as ROOT context putting

Re: More info on deploying an app on ROOT

2012-12-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Im a bit lost with your versions, can you check tomee 1.5.1? ( and maybe trunk) Le 30 déc. 2012 08:27, Enrico Olivelli eolive...@gmail.com a écrit : may I create an issue in JIRA for this problem ? it actually blocks me, I cannot upgrade apps on production environment without refactoring

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, I need at least 3 fixes (todo) pretty quickly Hope to get it mid january so end of january would be fine Would be a 1.6 IMO Will try to explain more next year ;) Le 29 déc. 2012 23:44, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com a écrit : Jean-Louis: This is a very serious topic for my

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi Alex, You are all welcome to share your needs and what you expect (and also to help if you can ;-)). IMO, TomEE 1.x.y is only Java EE 6 dedicated. The work on Java EE 7 will start Q2 2013 I guess or a bit after and it should produce the 2.x.y of TomEE. Java EE 8, dunno for the moment, maybe

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Id like to break rest default config so 1.6 is better imo Le 30 déc. 2012 21:34, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Alex, You are all welcome to share your needs and what you expect (and also to help if you can ;-)). IMO, TomEE 1.x.y is only Java EE 6 dedicated. The work

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Alex The Rocker
Jean-Louis: I wasn't very clear, sorry for that, but I think you got the idea :) If I understand well your proposal of TomEE versioning, it would be x.y.z, with x=1 for Java EE 6 ; and y moving when there are new features and z moving for fixes. Why not, but this is a little bit different from

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
That sounds pretty similar to Tomcat. If we can adapt a bit to make things even clearer I'm all for it. Whatever the next version will be, yes we can create a page and push our versioning thoughts and Java EE mapping. Would you like to start pushing your understanding as you proposed previously

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Note: why should we follow tomcat? Tomcat is pretty simple and doesnt depend of anything else compared to us so it is natural if our versioning is a bit less straight fwd even if we try to keep it as simple as possible Moreover we are tied to openejb too which doesnt depend on tomcat Le 30 déc.

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Alex The Rocker
Okay, now time for a stupid question : I'm asked to enter an Apache ID, how can I register one? (the ID which I use for JIRA doesn't work here) On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote: That sounds pretty similar to Tomcat. If we can adapt a bit to make

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
No stupid question, only stupid answers. Apache ID = apache committer ID You can just say No and enter in an anonymous mode. As soon as you validate it, we receive a patch to commit for you. @Romain, no need to follow Tomcat, was just to clarify things in my opinion and check their versioning

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 1.5.2 release and 1.6.0

2012-12-30 Thread Alex The Rocker
When I click 'No', I'm redirected to this location: https://cms.apache.org/openejb/wc/browse/anonymous-sFLdJE/trunk/ and I don't see where I could edit the page about TomEE versions :( Am I missing something? On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote: No