added back differently on trunk.
- Romain
Le 30 avr. 2012 11:15, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
Finished up a video on using TomEE in Eclipse. It's pretty great.
Uploading currently.
Going to stay up and try and beef up our release notes. They're generated
from JIRA
Made a getting started video which I think would be great to replace the other
video on the main page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr8pxEACVRI
-David
, 2012 at 12:55 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Made a getting started video which I think would be great to replace the
other video on the main page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr8pxEACVRI
-David
On Apr 29, 2012, at 5:07 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Hold the noise till tomorrow morning when the ASF announcement goes out.
Then be as noisy as possible :)
Time for the noise! :)
-David
On Apr 30, 2012, at 8:42 AM, dsh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:51 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seems like a lot of these suggestions involve having TomEE support already
in the Eclipse binary that people download from eclipse.org. That sounds
great. Do you know
Ok! Closing the vote so we can get the binaries on the mirrors. Vote passes
with 7 +1s and no other votes:
+1s:
Andy Gumbrecht
David Blevins
Gaurav Sharma
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Romain Manni-Bucau
Hold the noise till tomorrow morning when the ASF announcement goes
Text file in svn is good enough. All the entries are public.
-David
On Apr 28, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
We should definitely include TomEE. The also ask all sorts of interesting
questions in the submission form
http://jax-awards.com/technology_submission.php. We should start
Finally got a full build to work on windows in my Parallels VM. After a few
fixes to the main code and test, I was just left with this one issue:
Could not create framework: java.io.FileNotFoundException:
\\psf\Home\.pax\exam\org\apache\felix\org.apache.felix.framework\3.0.9\
On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:01 AM, AndyG wrote:
I will do a fresh check-out and try again.
Excellent. Note that neither Romain or I have been able to reproduce any of
the build issues you've reported. There indeed *were* windows build issues
(should be fixed now), but strangely we seem to see
This is definitely the one and not just because Nexus gave us the awesome
001 staging number for our TomEE 1.0.0 release. Those are all good omens,
but this is the one because it finally is happy on windows and, yes, we did
have some windows issues not in Arquillian, but in the core. Yikes,
Reminder that the announcement is Monday morning and we need roughly 24 hours
to sync the binaries to the mirrors.
This vote needs to close by Sunday morning. Vote as early as possible.
-David
On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:52 AM, David Blevins wrote:
This is definitely the one and not just
Vishwa, you're my hero. Seriously, thank you!
For the interested, you get 1 respect point for one act of coding. You get 3
for helping on the user list. You get 10 for helping with the documentation.
So Vishwa's up by like a 1000 points :)
There's actually another level too. You get 100
Got this from JAX. Interested to see how TomEE does after our announcement
Monday. Maybe we should enter TomEE?
-
As you may be aware the JAX Innovation Awards 2012 are open for
nominations, however they will close in 10 days time.
This is just a quick reminder, as you may have
TCK is 100%
Link sent to the tck@openejb.a.o list.
-David
On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:28 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
Changes since last vote:
- r1330642 | dblevins | Wed Apr 25 20:51:21 PDT 2012 | 22
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1330642
Oh and you can publish the site anytime via this link:
https://cms.apache.org/openejb/publish
-David
On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Vishwa, you're my hero. Seriously, thank you!
For the interested, you get 1 respect point for one act of coding. You get 3
On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
+100 pts ;)
Indeed :)
-David
- Romain
Le 27 avr. 2012 23:53, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
Vishwa, you're my hero. Seriously, thank you!
For the interested, you get 1 respect point for one act of coding
Thanks goes to everyone! We're growing and let's put it this way... it isn't
because I've figured out how to clone myself :)
Anyone who's been watching knows the large imact that Romain, Andy and Thiago
have had on the release. Romain for his million and one features, Andy for his
crazy
On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:47 AM, AndyG wrote:
-1
Running org.apache.openejb.arquillian.session.SessionScopeTest
TomEE Listener can't start OpenEJB
org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException:
org.apache.xbean.recipe.MissingFactoryMethodException: Constructor has 0
arugments
but expected 3
Has anyone ever gotten a full build to work on windows in recent months?
Full build with tests on.
-David
, David Blevins (JIRA) j...@apache.org a écrit :
David Blevins created TOMEE-167:
---
Summary: Disable support for legacy v2 openejb-jar.xml by
default. Only needed for Geronimo
Key: TOMEE-167
URL: https
Would be great to at least some of the performance work into the 1.0.0 binaries
as there's a bit over 3x increase in Eclipse startup time and a bit over 2x in
regular startup time.
Aside from performance I did find two bugs:
- Web.xml metadata-complete effectively ignore
have 2 days to make any changes and incorporate feedback. Then the door
is closed.
-David
On Apr 23, 2012, at 1:04 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Sally Khudairi (Apache PR person) has drafted us up an official Apache
announcement like there was for the certification.
She asked when
expect things to lean
towards the Variable side as they should.
So, yes, we are fast, but hopefully the above will break that word down into
a more useful description of what fast means for us.
-David
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:48 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Would be great to at least some
On Apr 25, 2012, at 8:16 AM, David Blevins wrote:
To allow 72 hours for voting no votes can start later than Wednesday night.
Reminder, cut-off on fixes/improvements is tonight.
FYI, cutting process started a bit ago.
CI build green:
- http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-4-empty-repo
Ok, this vote could pass and the time is up. A new set of binaries are coming
with the performance improvements and the continued windows/arquillian fixes.
If disaster strikes on the new build, then this is our build.
-David
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:17 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Not really a fan of Amsterdam, though there might be somewhere else in NL
that's fun.
I've been getting huge guilt trips from my Spanish in-laws for having never
visited once in the 12 years, so I'd be partial to Spain.
-David
On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Then?
On Apr 24, 2012, at 1:21 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Then, I will be in Portugal ;-)
That can work too :) Amelia's family is in Carril, Spain, just above Portugal.
-David
Le 24 avril 2012 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
August but not the last week?
You're right 1000 is pretty high. It should be more like 4 or 10.
-David
On Apr 24, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Gaurav Sharma wrote:
+1
I have been running basic tests on a dev node (mac) and green so far. One
question: in tomee.xml, why is the Stateful bean capacity default 1000 -
might that be
File a JIRA for that so I can add you to the contributors group and mark you as
the fixer :)
Quality is in the details and there are a quantity of those :) Every tiny bit
helps!
-David
On Apr 24, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Gaurav Sharma wrote:
+1
I have been running basic tests on a dev node
Doing some server startup improvements and actually found and fixed a couple
bugs. Anyway...
Here's what I'm now seeing on a TomEE install started from the command line:
- apache-tomee-webprofile-1.0.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT/logs/catalina.out:INFO: Server
startup in 1546 ms
And here's what I'm
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:20 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Doing some server startup improvements and actually found and fixed a couple
bugs. Anyway...
Here's what I'm now seeing on a TomEE install started from the command line:
- apache-tomee-webprofile-1.0.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT/logs
:28, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
Another -1 to add to the list. Attempted to get TomEE working with the
Eclipse WTP Tomcat plugin and found it near impossible.
I did all the things you shouldn't do (i.e. I did it the most intuitive
way which doesn't work). Once I got
instances.
Jlouis
Le 22 avr. 2012 09:14, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
a écrit :
On Apr 21, 2012, at 10:51 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
David,
Does it mean that the tomee webapp is no more there or just that
tomee/lib
shifted to tomcat/lib?
That webapps/tomee/lib shifted
to the
catalina.properties would have done the trick. That's how we've more or
less proceeded until now to share the same tomcat binaries between
application instances.
Jlouis
Le 22 avr. 2012 09:14, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
a écrit :
On Apr 21, 2012, at 10:51 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
David
Vote will be extended till Saturday at 4pm PDT to give more time for review.
At this time a new set of binaries will be posted with a delta of the changes.
The new binaries will contain only the fixes that are possible to complete
between now and the next 30 hours.
Anything that takes days or
On Apr 19, 2012, at 8:31 AM, AndyG wrote:
-1
Added some other fixes in trunk, but this one is repeating on a Win7 32bit
JDK 1.6.31 build.
---
Test set: org.apache.openejb.arquillian.TomEEContainerTest
On Apr 19, 2012, at 10:16 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 19, 2012, at 8:31 AM, AndyG wrote:
-1
Added some other fixes in trunk, but this one is repeating on a Win7 32bit
JDK 1.6.31 build.
---
Test set
to
see if I don't break something else. :O)
Sorry!!!
[]s,
Thiago.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:02 AM, David Blevins
david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looks like the links were not quite right :) Need update the
template.
Here is what it should have listed:
SVN Tag:
https
As mentioned in the Experiment: Voting and revoting thread, this vote will
continue till Friday 10pm PDT.
Issue your votes and be ready to quickly reaffirm on the second vote. Do not
wait for a second set of binaries to vote.
We'll get all the feedback and have a, possibly quick, second vote.
know why we have the openjpa issue, just a maven scope/dep issue, i'll
try to commit a fix soon.
- Romain
2012/4/16 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
New set of preview binaries based on the xbean-finder improvements.
-
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories
in org.apache.xbean.finder.archive.JarArchive.JarIterator#JarIterator
why Jarfile is not used when possible?
- Romain
2012/4/15 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
(decision and 4 choices at the bottom -- feedback requested)
I did some studying of the zip file format and determined that part of
the reworked xbean-finder Archive
On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
asm 3.2 comes from openjpa 2.2.x
we can easily remove it simply replacing
the openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/enhance/AsmAdaptor.java
class by our one using xbean asm.
thoughts?
Sounds great.
-David
I added the xbean and bval staging repos to the branch so we could get a build
of 1.0.0 and start the process of checking that everything is ok. So ideally
when both of those are released, we'll have a very short release vote ourselves.
Consider this a dry run for a vote.
Staging Repo:
As stated, I'm a 0. Wherever the most people can get-together is where I'll be.
-David
On Apr 12, 2012, at 3:19 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
For the last two years OpenEJB community succeeded to hold a Meetup once
a year. And not to break the rule :), we are looking forward to
On Apr 12, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
INFO: Beginning load:
c:\dev\ws\openejb\openejb400\source\tomee\apache-tomee\target\apache-tomee-webprofile-1.0.0\webapps\tomee\lib\openejb-itests-cli
ent-4.0.0.jar
12-Apr-2012 7:48:51 PM org.apache.openejb.config.ConfigurationFactory
Responding in a second email (wanted to keep the original data clean).
A asm-3.2.jar
This is one of the libraries we intentionally repackage (xbean-asm) in order to
avoid library conflicts with other popular libs (like hibernate).
I'll have a look to see what is pulling in asm and see if it
On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:36 AM, David Blevins wrote:
The release branch is looking pretty good. We're still waiting on two
snapshots:
- Bean Validation
- XBean
Ok, both are up for votes now! So we're getting close.
Thanks, Romain, for adding a buildbot builder definition
On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:32 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:36 AM, David Blevins wrote:
The release branch is looking pretty good. We're still waiting on two
snapshots:
- Bean Validation
- XBean
Ok, both are up for votes now! So we're getting close.
Thanks
Awesome. If it proves hard, feel free to comment that chunk of the EJBResponse
readExternal/writeExternal code for the release branch. We can always add that
in more carefully later.
If we're able to make it work, though, even better :)
-David
On Apr 9, 2012, at 11:20 PM, AndyG wrote:
I
Hi Gaurav! Welcome aboard!
Before I list some suggestions understand none of them are orders and the most
important thing is to find something you like doing. That usually takes a bit
of trial and error, so don't feel obligated to get married to the first task
you pick. Feel free to date a
Great feature btw :)
On Apr 8, 2012, at 1:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Let's add a jira for this new feature.
On Apr 8, 2012, at 7:28 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Sun Apr 8 14:28:24 2012
New Revision: 1311012
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
Discussion looked pretty positive, so going to create the branch for preparing
the 1.0.0.
Hoping we should be good on TCK. We had some regressions with regards to some
of the performance enhancements I added. I disabled one and fixed the other
(the bigger perf issue). So fingers crossed on
Whichever gets done :)
-David
On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no?
- Romain
Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote
We're overdue for a release. OpenWebBeans is currently preparing the 1.1.4 we
need. We should start preparing as well.
Currently, the release version we have is beta-3. I think we're pretty safe
for a 1.0 at this point.
Any thoughts?
Regardless of what we call it, it would be nice to maybe
Bringing this up again. Here are my thoughts:
I'll go wherever the most people can (or want to) get together.
If that turns out to be Los Angeles as Jean-Louis proposed, I'd happily take
the money saved on travel and throw us a party to celebrate the certification
and 1.0 final.
Either way,
On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much time
since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project.
The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs
running :O) ). Also, I
) {
for (Class? clazz :
finder.findAnnotatedClasses(annClazz)) {
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins [mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:02 PM
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build fails with an empty maven
settings.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins [mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:30 PM
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build fails with an empty maven repository
I don't seem to be able to reproduce the issue.
In hopes
On Mar 29, 2012, at 12:11 AM, AndyG wrote:
Done. With a small tweak
Very nice! The blocking pool shutdown is excellent.
-David
Thanks, Filip!
I have a build running with an empty local maven repo and will see if I get the
same or similar results.
For a while there we had buildbot build setup to always download the jar for
this reason to try and flush out these issues when they happen. Buildbot had
some disk space
On Mar 22, 2012, at 8:38 AM, AndyG wrote:
Ok, so I know this is me - but I think the test needs the fix? Opinions.
Changed the timer to fire a sweep after defined period. I just don't see why
a sweep should occur immediately when the pool is created as it is unlikely
to need one?
Saw that
I've been doing some work on the multipoint failover/clustering code. In the
process I've done some major improvements to the client using an event pattern
which has been proving to be a major help in logging and testing.
It's basically a trimmed version of CDI @Observes/fireEvent.
is it easy to register an observer? couldn't we use cdi?
Yep. There's a method on the Client object which does it. For the server
itself using CDI would definitely be preferable. So far, this tiny class has
all the client needs:
https://gist.github.com/2154225
-David
2012/3/22 David
On Mar 21, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Fotr the log we should be able to do so using a custom logger.
Feel free to hack one up!
-David
Le 22 mars 2012 00:46, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mar 21, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote
On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:05 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Mon Mar 12 15:05:59 2012
New Revision: 1299702
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1299702view=rev
Log:
isn't BeanContext.Removable only for stateful beans?
Works for @ManagedBean as well in our
points regarding this interface please?
- Romain
2012/3/12 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:05 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Mon Mar 12 15:05:59 2012
New Revision: 1299702
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1299702view=rev
On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:15 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
+++
openejb/trunk/openejb/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/BeanContext.java
Mon Mar 12 10:15:49 2012
+private boolean hasField(final Class? clazz, final String name) {
+Class? current = clazz;
The description implies something ignored is now not ignored (a bugfix), but it
appears to just be a formatting change.
-David
On Mar 8, 2012, at 5:20 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Thu Mar 8 11:20:16 2012
New Revision: 1298362
URL:
Also appears to just be a formatting change.
-David
On Mar 6, 2012, at 4:20 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Mar 6 10:20:08 2012
New Revision: 1297405
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297405view=rev
Log:
trying to guess the module is a webapp
-entries.properties was ignored.
- Romain
2012/3/9 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
The description implies something ignored is now not ignored (a bugfix),
but it appears to just be a formatting change.
-David
On Mar 8, 2012, at 5:20 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
was used :s
- Romain
2012/3/9 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Also appears to just be a formatting change.
-David
On Mar 6, 2012, at 4:20 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Mar 6 10:20:08 2012
New Revision: 1297405
URL: http://svn.apache.org
ConfigurationFactory line 356:
Collections.sort(resources, new ResourceInfoComparator(resources));
It's a stable sort, so if no resource has a property where the name matches
another resource, then the order of the list is not affected.
-David
On Mar 9, 2012, at 9:28 AM, Romain
Thanks, so much, for doing that!
Very excellent!
-David
On Mar 9, 2012, at 1:58 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/DeltaSpike/job/DeltaSpike%20TomEE/2/testReport/
it rocks!
thanks Gerhard!
- Romain
I thought we already supported injection on the handler. What problem is this
aimed at?
-David
On Mar 5, 2012, at 6:02 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Mar 6 00:02:21 2012
New Revision: 1297301
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297301view=rev
Log:
Didn't get a chance to dig in much, but looks neat so far!
Don't forget to add the README.md when adding to the index.md.
-David
On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:13 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Mar 6 09:13:47 2012
New Revision: 1297392
URL:
What issue does this fix?
-David
On Mar 6, 2012, at 5:19 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Mar 6 11:19:07 2012
New Revision: 1297428
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297428view=rev
Log:
multiple persistence.xml can be found in a webapp but
well known getter/setter.
Le 29 févr. 2012 03:44, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Feb 27, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Was my analysis so the question is do we still need to capture them
like it
or can we use more simple setters/getters
Thanks for the two JIRAs!! :)
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:43 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
==
---
openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/installer/Installer.java
(original)
+++
On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
that's ok for me,
but in that case we remove geronimo jaxb from javaee-api
We need both the api and impl jars in the endorsed dir.
-David
2012/2/29 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Thanks for the two JIRAs!! :)
On Feb 29
no longer something we ship.
That said, if we wanted to certify our JAX-WS stack, we'd have to upgrade to
2.2 which means putting the jaxb impl in an endorsed dir (same as
@Resource.lookup)
-David
Le 28 févr. 2012 06:36, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Feb 26, 2012
On Feb 27, 2012, at 4:54 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
xbean-finder is currently part of geronimo, but it has it's own build
lifecycle!
It is _not_ part of the standard geronimo build chain. Thus it _currently_
doesn't lead to a circular build cycle.
Right.
All of XBean used to live at
Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:43 AM, David Blevins wrote:
# JAXB Accessors
One of the biggest polluters of the class space is JAXB as it generates
accessors for all the fields. First thought is, gee, I wonder if we can do
that at build time and keep the class
On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:43 AM, David Blevins wrote:
# JAXB Accessors
One of the biggest polluters of the class space is JAXB as it generates
accessors for all the fields. First thought is, gee, I wonder if we can do
that at build time and keep the class definitions. If there's some way
Definitely the goal is to move it to xbean. Moving xbean to commons is
certainly something that can be done, though that wouldn't improve it's ability
to be used, it's really just be a package change for whatever that is worth.
Though it might have an impact on how much people actually *want*
Shifting to this task https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-144
We scan each app about 4 times as far as I can tell. Fixing this will
eliminate one of them.
-David
things to keep in mind as we discuss.
-David
On Feb 20, 2012, at 2:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
We've chatted occasionally on creating a scanning.xml file where people could
setup includes and excludes and, overall, optimize classpath scanning.
Romain is already busy hacking of course
We've chatted occasionally on creating a scanning.xml file where people could
setup includes and excludes and, overall, optimize classpath scanning.
Romain is already busy hacking of course :) Here's the idea for a plugin to
effectively do the most expensive part of scanning in advance:
Was going to try and add everyone to the circle of the Apache TomEE Google+
page, but it appears that Google doesn't allow that until you are following the
Apache TomEE page.
So if you want to be listed in the Team Members circle, you need to first add
Apache TomEE to your circles:
it is obvious.
We would probably skip the property and just always log on some fine level.
-David
2012/2/19 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Feb 19, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
hope it is better now
Thanks!
@David: why sout rather than logger in debug
On Feb 19, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
almost done it,
simply need to fix examples and maybe tests
- Romain
2012/2/19 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
I seem to recall we fixed our web service support in TomEE so that the
services were inside the application rather
at 8:27 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The compile error is now fixed.
I'm getting an OOM error now.
http://pastie.org/3402767
I have my memory settings pretty high due to the Geronimo build. Not sure
how much
I seem to recall we fixed our web service support in TomEE so that the services
were inside the application rather than at the root.
Would be excellent if we could get the same support in plain OpenEJB. For
example:
@BeforeClass
public static void setUp() throws Exception {
On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
217 /examples-trunk/simple-webservice/README.html
Fixed this one up. It's now three, well documented, examples:
-
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/examples-trunk/simple-webservice/README.html
-
http://openejb.staging.apache.org
On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The compile error is now fixed.
I'm getting an OOM error now.
http://pastie.org/3402767
I have my memory settings pretty high due to the Geronimo build. Not sure how
much we actually need. Here's my setting:
declare -x
Just a reminder that when adding flags and properties into code, to use the
SystemInstance Options to check for those properties.
Specifically, calls like the following should be avoided.
- Boolean.getBoolean(foo)
- System.getProperty(foo)
If someone were to attempt to use the above in an
in SytemInstance rather than java.lang.System so we
can see all sources of properties.
-David
2012/2/16 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Just a reminder that when adding flags and properties into code, to use
the SystemInstance Options to check for those properties.
Specifically, calls like
An FYI on some completed site fixes.
Most of this magic is in the perl code in these two files:
- /openejb/site/trunk/lib/view.pm
- /openejb/site/trunk/lib/path.pm
## Bad // in breadcrumbs
Fixed the code that creates breadcrumbs links that had '//'
## APIs used
Added some code to create a
The people have spoken :)
Here are the examples that were hit the most in January according to Google
Analytics. Some of these are in better shape than others. Any help fixing
these up would put smiles on the faces of a few hundred people.
1556
engine. We could
even have KDE or Win 7 widgets accesing the 1st webapp and thus TomEE
instances could be managed from the desktop...
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:41 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
wrote:
Thought these might be some good discussion points/improvements
On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
at work we have to use a proxy to get connected to the internet. Nothing
special but each time a maven build needs to connect to external network we
need to set it: mvn XXX -Dhttp.proxyPort=1234 -Dhttp.proxyHost=foo for
instance.
201 - 300 of 1653 matches
Mail list logo
