Did a major overhaul of all the Arquillian adapters, largely focused on
splitting the Tomcat+OpenEJB.war and TomEE Remote adapter apart. Slashed the
dependencies down and added a bunch more error handling and logging.
Also setup the following profiles in arquillian-tomee-tests:
-
conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) ::
http://confitura.pl
Hoping to save time by spending it by David Blevins (Apache OpenEJB)
That and I'm lazy :) If I can get my IDE setup to already import all the
Assert.* methods, that'd help my laziness.
Anyway +1 to switching as you encounter.
Also +1 to switching tests to use the ApplicationComposer as you find them.
Removes quite a bit of boiler plate from the code.
-David
On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the Apple
developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do
people work around this problem?
I
On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:09 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the Apple
developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field
Added an empty directory to contain what will hopefully be a home for some
massively large tests.
Romain showed me some code he wrote to generate 1000 ejbs and deploy them to
see what performance issues popped up. Reminded me of some code I wrote in the
early days of OpenEJB to do the same
,
classloading time etc...
- Romain
2012/2/1 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
BcProv is another one which cause long startup delay.
Jean-Louis
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Would be great to get an integration test that creates a webapp with say
10 or 20mb
- Romain
2012/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
+1 as soon as the old style still works.
I mean, if we can still deliver an openejb.xml file, an openejb war and so.
May be I can go back and help in one of them.
Jean-Louis
2012/1/31 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
This sounds like a great feature.
My gut instinct is that maybe it should be disabled by default and something we
encourage people to enable.
What do others think?
-David
On Feb 1, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
+1
Of course if that is one of my idea.
Just to argue a bit.
definitely something really easy to
shut off.
This could easily be a ServerService with a file that extracts to
conf/updates.properties. Some of the config params could be the URL we check
for updates and the frequency we check.
-David
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
This sounds
someday add a rest call to see if their
server is up to date (it would report the cached value from the last check) it
would be really easy.
-David
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
i would like to see it activated
.
-David
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
already added a version but not as a service.
it can be desactivated using configuration factory offline mode or a
dedicated system property. The downloadable url and check url
.
-David
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
it doesn't really match,
it is nice to get the info in test mode too so it should be in the core.
Having it on for a test would seem to be a really bad idea. We'd be doing
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:29 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
shouldn't cost anything
My preference would be for it not being enabled by default for testing and
for getting out of core and as a separate jar. Or at the very least a
separate
On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
i didnt find it in VmDeploymentManager.
That's fine. Did you try running a few TCK tests to verify the changes?
-David
- Romain
2012/2/1 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
We'll definitely want to make sure we update
[yet another email I found sitting open and not sent]
Really great, Gerhard!
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
in addition to [1] i also created [2]. currently [3] just builds the
project with mvn clean install (and without running the tests) as soon as a
snapshot
that cat's all the reports to stdout so they show up in buildbot:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-trunk-ubuntu/builds/1789/steps/test-results
-David
2012/1/31 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:18 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 8:22
On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:24 AM, AndyG wrote:
I also think this is something that maybe just been highlighted by a
classloader issue somewhere else.
That definitely seems to be the case.
I would focus debugging efforts at line 87 of org.apache.openejb.cli.Bootstrap
The uppercase and lowercase
Would be great to get an integration test that creates a webapp with say 10 or
20mb of jars. Then measure that startup time and keep track of it over time.
As well we could actually start testing specific libraries inside the webapp to
see if there are issues. Spring comes to mind.
Likely
of any conflict (it overrides any META-INF/ejb-jar.xml files).
I personally see that as a bit low on the needs list. Adding in a scanning.xml
file would be higher.
-David
On Feb 15, 2011, at 9:54 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I had to temporarily gut our webapp scanning enhancements (include
On Jan 30, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm getting errors when I try to build trunk:
Failed tests:
MDB.PojoContextLookup.lookupStatefulBean(org.apache.openejb.test.NumberedTestCase$NamedTest):
Received Exception class java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException :
What config does configtest test (logging, server.xml, openejb.xml,
fooservice.properties, etc) and how does it do it?
-David
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
can be found here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/maven-plugins/tomee-maven-plugin/
goals:
00:18, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
What config does configtest test (logging, server.xml, openejb.xml,
fooservice.properties, etc) and how does it do it?
-David
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
can be found here:
https://svn.apache.o
Thought these might be some good discussion points/improvements for TomEE.
- TOMEE-130: Improve openejb webapp console to match current site look and feel
- TOMEE-131: The openejb.xml file should be called tomee.xml in TomEE
- TOMEE-132: Make it easier to use command line deployer in TomEE
-
do we want it to look and what should people be copying are definitely
important ones.
-David
2012/1/27 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Hey, Daniel! Just wanted you to know that this is at the top of my list
for tomorrow!
That was a particularly brutal release, developing all
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:25 PM, AndyG wrote:
Also +1. Thanks David.
As mentioned before, in production adding something like
-Dopenejb.log.factory=log4j is not as easy as it sounds. Especially if has
to be done by a 'user' over the wire.
Note, log4j will likely be cut from the distro so
Not sure this is accurate.
The entire webapp itself should be treated as one EjbModule and all jars in
WEB-INF/lib/ and WEB-INF/classes are part of the same module.
The path of the EjbModule needs to be the same as the WebModule or ejb-link
functionality will break as will resolving
If someone is using Log4j syntax and we cannot respect that, we will now log
messages to system.out explicitly saying that the settings will be ignored.
Come to think about it I need to tweak that... One sec...
-David
2012/1/25 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Thanks for the gentle but firm
On Jan 26, 2012, at 12:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
normally the default logging should simply be a JUL logging.
the only modification is if you don't override OpenEJB root loggers
(OpenEJB, Transaction...) the handler (=appender
Forwarding to the dev list so hopefully we can get more eyes on it.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
Subject: tomee (b2) and codi
Date: January 25, 2012 7:20:35 AM PST
To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
hi david,
... the names would fit
Thanks for the gentle but firm email :) Just the right balance.
On Jan 25, 2012, at 2:36 AM, AndyG wrote:
So how about some info about how to configure the 'new' logging - I don't
really care what logging is used as long as when it changes there is a
little info for those using the 'old'
Posting for Romain as he has temporarily lost access to his gmail account.
He hacked this up:
http://openejb.staging.apache.org
Looks pretty great and nearly identical to what we had. Note that's not live
yet, just a preview (staging is a great feature of the CMS)
-David
Think it just pulls a few and rotates them.
On Jan 25, 2012, at 1:49 PM, dsh wrote:
Is it updating in real-time? I don't think so...
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:15 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Posting for Romain as he has temporarily lost access to his gmail account
Have a blog post ready to go, here's the preview:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/openejb/?previewEntry=apache_tomee_1_0_0
Feel free to suggest changes, or make changes (grab the test, edit, send back
to the list or check in somewhere). Getting that out tomorrow morning would be
great.
that shows download and startup is definitely a nice
confirmation.
Just some thoughts.
Course anyone is welcome to make videos (one in each language could be cool).
-David
On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:02 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Have a blog post ready to go, here's the preview:
https
(BCC'ed all committers)
Retweets encouraged!
https://twitter.com/#!/ApacheTomEE/statuses/161903294216806400
-David
Only works for http traffic (no email), but it's active
http://tomee.apache.org
Just an alias for openejb.apache.org of course, but should save on some time in
articles explaining why people need to go to openejb to download the Java EE
server they heard about.
-David
If it gets adopted by Camel I might suggest calling it camel-javaee or
something.
Odds are if no one peaks below the surface they won't realize it can deploy CDI
apps, JAX-RS apps, JAX-WS, JMS, JPA, etc. etc. Course Camel can do many of
those things anyway, so who knows. :)
The quick look I
Ok, vote closes with 6 +1s and no other votes:
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Jonathan Gallimore
Romain Manni-Bucau
Thiago Veronezi
Have pushed the binaries. Let's give it a few hours to sync.
Will update the downloads page and draft up a blog post tomorrow
Feel free to remove any duplicates. There seems to be a few. Heading to bed
though, fun for someone else :)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/site/trunk/content/release-notes.txt
-David
Forgot to use the official header :)
On Jan 23, 2012, at 3:49 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok, vote closes with 6 +1s and no other votes:
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Jonathan Gallimore
Romain Manni-Bucau
Thiago Veronezi
Have pushed the binaries. Let's
I was thinking it might be nice to put the interview I did with O'Reilly on our
front page for a while:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/site/
Seems to do a good job of expressing what TomEE is and probably it has a
limited shelf life. We might as well get some value out of it before it
On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
What about using jul by default and removing our default configs (jul +
lo4j)? These confs sucks since it is never what the user wants and it hides
a big part of the whole logging.
Ill have a try tonight, shout if you see any
On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
What about using jul by default and removing our default configs (jul +
lo4j)? These confs sucks since it is never what the user wants and it hides
a big part of the whole
On Jan 22, 2012, at 4:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
What about using jul by default and removing our default configs (jul +
lo4j)? These confs sucks since it is never what
On Jan 22, 2012, at 4:20 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2012, at 4:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
What about using jul by default and removing our default configs
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:16 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Fri Jan 20 11:16:20 2012
New Revision: 1233868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1233868view=rev
Log:
managing karaf upgrade to 2.2.5 and trying to avoid usage of already
listening ports
On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:52 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Fri Jan 20 08:52:58 2012
New Revision: 1233816
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1233816view=rev
Log:
trying to use the resolver if the application is not found
Modified:
Big features don't come in one commit. That's the thing to remember. I'll
come back to that thought shortly
Here are some stats from beta-1 to beta-2:
- There were 436 commits total. (whoo hoo!!)
- Only 69 of those commits had JIRAs (eek!)
So first, totally awesome to see all the
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:34 PM, dsh wrote:
Only two beers???
LOL!!!
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi devs,
First of, I wish you all the best for 2012.
Just a small message to remind you our annual Get-Together.
Last year, it took
On Jan 18, 2012, at 1:55 PM, og0815 wrote:
Hi,
just stumbled over another NullPointerException in
org.apache.tomee.webservices.TomcatRsRegistry.createRsHttpListener(TomcatRsRegistry.java:100)
Found in 4.0.0-beta-2 staging and snapshot.
Create a JAX-RS Service
Create a
TCK looks good.
Here's my +1
-David
On Jan 16, 2012, at 7:06 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-2/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-075
=absmiddle doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where
that comes from.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
+1 from me too (I am
In efforts to both document and automate our release process, I spent the
weekend hacking on some tooling.
Another instance of hoping to save time by spending it :)
Still not one big step that does everything, but definitely leaps and bounds
better than before.
$ java -jar
Had thought this was fixed, but Romain confirms it's still broken.
Best to just cut out the remote adapter if it doesn't work. We can try again
next release.
Had already re-rolled the release last night and ran the TCK, but will do that
again with this trimmed.
-David
On Jan 13, 2012, at
I updated the comparison to include TomEE as well.
I also trimmed the EJB content as I figure there's a good chance people will
want to use it to compare TomEE and TomEE+ and aren't there for EJB.
There's a new doc here that shows the evolution of EJB, which I thought could
give some insight
On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
+1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
in the comparison matrix).
[...]
So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java
EE specs
On Jan 11, 2012, at 11:25 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
I added a system property: openejb.server.debug=true to
RemoteTomEEContainer, and I was then able to hook up a remote debugger to
the server. Stopping
On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:49 AM, AndyG wrote:
Had a similar fix in the pipes here, was just not quick enough on the
check-in. However, just for info, I have had to bump up a few build
environment options on Windows to get a full build to complete:
set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx768m -XX:MaxPermSize=256M
Hehe. Well, it'll be very late tonight before I'll get the chance to hack
again. I can port that fix over to the branch, or if someone wants to be beat
me to it I can spend that time rolling the new release binaries instead.
Either way, we're looking very good thanks to everyone who has
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
+1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
in the comparison matrix).
Did a quick look at the Google Analytics. Some stats from the last 30 days:
Between the three main product links, here's where traffic goes:
28% -
On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:14 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:14:34 2012
New Revision: 1230120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1230120view=rev
Log:
normally everything should be fine simply scanning pu with the old way
Out of curiosity, what
On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:45 AM, AndyG wrote:
The whole temp file thing seems to have arisen from JDK inconsistency issues
related to the ClassLoaderUtil.clearSunJarFileFactoryCache method.
This method was for a period failing to actually release the file handle on
jar files due to some real
On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:52 AM, dsh wrote:
On the other hand I'd like to understand why building and sanity
testing a particular branch to be released on one of the windows
buildbot slaves isn't enough. Is it because each buildbot slave needs
to be manually configured for each new branch that
a complementary setup
for the IBM JDK which became inactive too.
If you still have that account, is it possible you could log in and forcibly
remove the current svn checkout. Seems the build doesn't run because of a file
conflict on svn co.
-David
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:52 PM, David
Excellent. If you can send your JIRA id, I can add you to the
openejb-contributors JIRA group and then assign those to you.
-David
On Jan 11, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Daniel Siwiec wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to work on one of the examples: OpenEJB OPENEJB-1605 Java EE 6
Examples OPENEJB-1612. Could you
You're in! Both JIRAs assigned to you!
Nice little doc on writing examples:
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/dev/writing-examples.html
-David
On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Daniel Siwiec wrote:
It's daniel.siwiec
Cheers!
2012/1/11 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Excellent
On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
I added a system property: openejb.server.debug=true to
RemoteTomEEContainer, and I was then able to hook up a remote debugger to
the server. Stopping in
org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.util.ServiceLoader, it appear that
the
over here, hope to post a vote soon.
Cheers
Jon
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run the TCK on these and
everything looks good -- will post link to the tck@ list.
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org
checking things over here, hope to post a vote soon.
Here's the report:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-029/archives.html
If you spot any issues, feel free to update the branch.
-David
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok
Darn.
I might be able to dig in on Saturday or Sunday, but not likely sooner. If
anyone out there who has the problem is able to dig a little it'd be very
appreciated.
-David
On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:36 AM, AndyG wrote:
Andy +0
Two test failures. Not dug in to the cause, so if anyone
Jon created some Maven Archetypes a while back. We should move those in there
too.
Not sure how fresh that code is, but we should probably update them, document
them and release them.
As well, if we end up with our own copy of the t7mp
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run the TCK on these and everything
looks good -- will post link to the tck@ list.
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-2/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-029/
David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Didn't seem there were any objections to yanking MyFaces API from the
javaee-api jar. Speak up if you have other thoughts.
Will aim to release this tomorrow if possible. Happy to wait -- just say
the word :)
-David
On Oct 28, 2011, at 1:47 PM
and test with OpenJPA itself.
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/openjpa-maven-plugin/
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: Release time?
On Jan
with snapshot dependencies in the source (mvn release plugin won't
update the poms if they're commented out). Probably better if we branch and do
that and leave trunk as-is.
-David
Le 4 janv. 2012 07:56, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:52 PM, David Blevins wrote
more time to get their releases out the door.
-David
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: Release time?
On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan
try and release something now as well?
-David
Le 4 janv. 2012 18:19, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
- the 0.3 release of bval means changing the bval tck setup
- the bug of owb 1.1.3 is not tested in TCKs (as a lot
to branch and see if I can get this rolling.
-David
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: Release time?
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote
improved as well in this month!
In ~1M we will get bval to TLP and release bval-1.0, release owb-1.1.4
and
release OpenJPA-2.2.0 (already triggered the discuss about it).
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:29 PM, dsh wrote:
Kind of off-topic: My I use this branch next week while working on the
TomEE magazine article?
Absolutely.
Ideally it will be released by then :)
-David
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:58 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Branch created
Note that we've always told people to drop their ears or jars into webapps/ and
it just works. If this broke, we should fix it.
We really shouldn't even have an apps/ dir in TomEE.
-David
On Jan 4, 2012, at 2:13 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Wed Jan 4
David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
What do people think about getting a release out this week?
We still have a couple snapshot dependencies. For bval maybe we can
revert to the patched version.
Thoughts?
-David
On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
+1
Can we use timestamped snapshot as a workaround (for snapshot deps, I mean)?
We could maybe release the code ourselves like Geronimo does from time to
time. Just copy
Jon talk (tuesday) before doing it?
- Romain
2011/10/28 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
We should probably yank the myfaces-api from the current javaee-api jar
snapshot.
Seems this jar is really an implementation and if someone wanted to use a
different Faces implementation
FYI, the openejb.staging.apache.org site is back up.
Thanks, Viswha for pointing it out!
There was a config change this morning in the infra side, all cleared up now.
-David
All is fine with OWB 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT. So we're in pretty great shape in that
regard.
The only real issue was that the webapps/ deploy approach still doesn't work
fully yet. That's not a shocker, it never completely worked. Definitely
something we'll need to work on in the coming days/weeks.
guess it will be buried eventually.
-David
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:44 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not really sure how Quora works. Think I accidentally created an Apache
TomEE profile and really was intending to create a Topic. Now that dud
Interesting idea to eliminate the need for jar-file elements in the
persistence.xml file
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-58
Would basically give you something like:
some.jar/META-INF/persistence.xml
red.jar/META-INF/persistence-fragment.xml
On Dec 28, 2011, at 5:37 AM, dsh wrote:
I sent you an invitation.
Also never heard of it. Send me one too!
-David
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not known as well for me.
If all accounts have real activities, that can be great.
an invitation to Romain, David and Mohammad. Btw, you make me
feel like a social networking geek in a certain way by pointing out
that you never heard of Quora ;)
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:14 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 28, 2011, at 5:37 AM, dsh
Looks like there's been a lot of great OSGi work going on this month. Charles
seems to be driving quite a lot of it -- thank you, Charles!
I wonder if I can get a high level view of the overall goal; i.e. what we're
doing and why users should care. Will be very useful for drafting upcoming
03:25, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
We generally don't use them, though we've never really had a formal
policy. I suspect we should just yank them.
Otherwise I have to go and add @author David Blevins to a whole lot of
files.
Will yank them tomorrow unless someone
On Dec 15, 2011, at 11:51 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
both i think
but well, karaf is a first step which can be enough for a lot of needs.
Fully agree. You're right with the additional lib burden, which I
We generally don't use them, though we've never really had a formal policy. I
suspect we should just yank them.
Otherwise I have to go and add @author David Blevins to a whole lot of files.
Will yank them tomorrow unless someone speaks up.
-David
And don't forget the great work on the twitter bot!
Very big +1!
-David
On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:35 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
All is in the subject :)
Vishwa has been very active to enhance our documentation and to create our
brand new website.
He also contributed some examples, etc.
with different images.
Unfortunately it looks to me like those JavaScript sliders are taking
an image as their foundation... at least the ones I found so far.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:31 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
That slider concept is really cool
On Nov 27, 2011, at 4:35 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
* tags and branches are always repository-global! It's not possible to just
tag a single subdirectory as you can do in SVN. You really need to know
upfront how you will going to release your stuff later (all the
modularisation thingy),
Tweaked the CDI TCK so that it can run with the apps deployed from the webapps/
directory (TOMEE-37)
You can give it a try from openejb/tck/cdi-tomee/ like so:
mvn clean install -Pwebapp-deployer
When I run it I get the following results:
Tests run: 844, Failures: 230, Errors: 0, Skipped:
On Nov 22, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
*
*
Since we cjhanged our website i think we should change our webapp too.
Obviously i think the look should be close.
However i would like to change the way it is done. Today it was jsp but i
think it can be clearer to use
301 - 400 of 1653 matches
Mail list logo
