On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
close the vote, and will send a result email later, thanks !
2011/10/26 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi, if no other issue, I will close the vote tomorrow.
2011/10/25 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi, Mark, source code packages are the artefacts we vote for, :-)
vote artifacts :
https
The OpenEJB 3.0.4 vote passed with the following votes
+1 Jacek Laskowski, Karan Malhi, Jeff Genender, Daniel, Romain Manni-Bucau,
Ivan
+0 AndyG, Mohammad Nour El-Din
no -1
Thanks, everyone, I will promote the artifacts soon.
2011/10/27 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
close the vote, and will send
to hold this vote open for at least one more
PMC vote. With my vote, we only have 2.
Here's the list of people we need to persuade to provide some legal
oversight:
adc
dain
dblevins
djencks
jgallimore
jlaskowski
jlmonteiro
kevan
-David
On Oct 26, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Ivan
://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-090/archives.html
-David
On Oct 22, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
OPENEJB
Hi, if no other issue, I will close the vote tomorrow.
2011/10/25 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi, Mark, source code packages are the artefacts we vote for, :-)
vote artifacts :
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-090/org/apache/openejb/openejb/3.0.4/openejb
/archives.html
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Ivan
-client.3.0.4.openejb-itests-standalone-client-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
We could fix the licenses or maybe just drop the itests app, client and
war.
-David
On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming
times is a good trade. I can do a lot of sleeping in
3-4 weeks :D
Hopefully it will save us all some time.
Still don't have my presentations ready for next week (giving 3
presentations and participating in 3 other panels). But I'm sure I'll pull
it off somehow :)
-David
--
Ivan
(injection of env entries).
Thank may be due to my environment.
Will give it another try.
Jean-Louis
2011/9/26 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
+1
Jacek
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, devs, help to comment it and throw a vote !
2011/9/25
Hi, devs, help to comment it and throw a vote !
2011/9/25 Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org
+1
Jeff
On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
Comparing with the last version
(and reason why)
--
Ivan
I may miss something in the release process, there are still some SNAPSHOT
not removed in the pom files. Thanks for pointing it out, Jon !
2011/9/23 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Thanks, Jonathan, no sure why there is still 3.0.4-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml
files. Will cancel this vote, and try it later
Yes, but all these things should be done by release plugin, that makes me
feel confusion
2011/9/23 Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org
grep -r -l SNAPSHOT *
;-)
Jeff
On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Ivan wrote:
I may miss something in the release process, there are still some
SNAPSHOT
the deploy plugin
with skiptrue/skip
With this, I got the release plugin to increment all the module versions,
and only released the modules I wanted.
grep was definitely my friend when working this out.
hope this helps
david jencks
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
Yes
repository :
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-087/
source codes :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Ivan
mvn rat:check -Prat passed for me, my +1
2011/9/21 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException
Suppose no one has objection for the propose :-), I will do the release work
for OpenEJB 3.0.4 tomorrow.
2011/9/20 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi, OpenEJB devs, Geronimo hopes to have a maintenance build 2.1.8, and it
seems that there are some important transaction changes in the
3.0.4-SNAPSHOT
Thanks, :-)
2011/9/21 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, OpenEJB devs, Geronimo hopes to have a maintenance build 2.1.8, and
it
seems that there are some important transaction changes in the
3.0.4-SNAPSHOT, which are required
Hi, OpenEJB devs, Geronimo hopes to have a maintenance build 2.1.8, and it
seems that there are some important transaction changes in the
3.0.4-SNAPSHOT, which are required for the new Geronimo release. If no
objection, I would like to take the release work for OpenEJB 3.0.4.
Thanks.
--
Ivan
it was intended to be so)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1146747-openejb-trunk-openejb3-container-openejb-core-src-main-java-org-apache-openeja-tp3674308p3677845.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ivan
at Nabble.com.
--
Ivan
);
field.setAccessible(true);
--
Ivan
-classInterceptor3/interceptor-class
/interceptor-order
method
method-namemethod1/method-name
method-params
method-paramjava.lang.String/method-param
/method-params
/method
/interceptor-binding
--
Ivan
2011/6/21 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 20, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at some interceptor samples, and after investigating some
failures, it looks to me that the issue is caused by two different method
level OVERLOADED_METHOD, EXACT_METHOD. Per
)
at
com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.AdaptedAccessor.set(AdaptedAccessor.java:70)
- Ranga
--
Ivan
there is better way for this.
2011/5/23 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com:
Hi,
In the HandlerChain class of the jee module, we uses QName for the
type of serviceNamePattern and portNamePattern for better access (By
default, String type is used in the generated classes). But in the web
service spec
.
Is there a way in JAXB to create a QName even the name space is
invalid ? I am thinking to have a XMLAdapter to do this from String,
but seems no way to look up the namespace by the prefix.
Thoughts ? Thanks.
--
Ivan
+1
2011/5/23 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com:
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
--
Ivan
+1
2011/5/23 Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org:
+1
Jeff
On May 22, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
--
Ivan
to last style: -3,-5
3, Last as element: 4, last
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
All of these Jiras are related to timer in openejb 4.0-SNAPSHOT.
--
Shawn
--
Shawn
--
Ivan
OK, seems that no one remembered that history, I also noticed that file is
added long long ago. I think that the only way is to remove it, and check
whether everything still works well.
2011/2/19 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi,
I found a GeronimoMappedName in the EJB deployment chain
(From the history, it seems that that tree is created in the
EJBDeploymentGBean in the past). I am wondering that do we still require it
? As it will configure the resource refer to an nonexisting place.
Thanks.
--
Ivan
-INF/lib/jstl.jar
/tmp/apache-tomcat-7.0.8/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/lib/standard.jar
We were also adding the persistence units twice which resulted in any
apps
that referenced a unit by name to fail.
-David
--
Shawn
--
Ivan
, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Ivan wrote:
I added some filtered options to prevent DeploymentLoader parsing other
modules in the past. From Geronimo side, DeploymentLoader only needs to
load
EjbModule and WsModule, but to make the codes also work correctly in
OpenEJB
itself, DeploymentLoader has
at Nabble.com.
--
Ivan
/... file for the service. Does it fail for me only?!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://jaceklaskowski.pl
--
Ivan
could only analysis the specified modules.
thanks.
2010/12/11 Jacek Laskowski ja...@laskowski.net.pl
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Ivan (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
Support interesting module types in DeploymentLoader
What's interesting module types? What's the use case for the
feature
I opened a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1413, will
attach a draft patch later.
thanks.
2010/12/10 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Another possible solution is to pass the interesting module types
/12/10 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
I found that there are many private and proected static methods in the
o.a.o.config.DeploymentLoader, it prevents to overrides those protected
methods in the subclass.. So is there any
Another possible solution is to pass the interesting module types to the
DeploymentLoader. WDYT ?
thanks.
2010/12/10 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hmm, if we just do not wish the DeploymentLoader to be extended, I think
private method or final class are enough, just feel curious why those
private
] Total time: 18:26.468s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Nov 12 09:22:20 CET 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 442M/989M
[INFO]
--
Karan Singh Malhi
--
Ivan
://people.apache.org/%7Edblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote1/build.xml
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote1/3.1.4/RELEASE-NOTES.txthttp://people.apache.org/%7Edblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote1/3.1.4/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Here's my +1
-David
--
Ivan
close the vote, will send out the result later.
2010/10/29 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Just get the result from Geronimo side, all the TCK cases passed.
2010/10/29 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org
+1
[]s,
Thiago.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
wrote
The vote passed with :
+1 Jeff Genender, Jonathan Gallimore Jean-Louis MONTEIRO, Daniel Haischt,
David Blevins, Thiago Veronezi
no +0 and -1.
Thanks for all of you for reviewing the artifacts, I will promote it soon.
2010/10/29 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Just get the result from Geronimo side, all
Just get the result from Geronimo side, all the TCK cases passed.
2010/10/29 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org
+1
[]s,
Thiago.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
wrote:
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
-Dassemble -Dusername=xuhaihong
-Darguments=-Dgpg.passphrase=
or
mvn release:perform -Dassemble -Dusername=xuhaihong -Dgpg.passphrase=
thanks.
2010/10/26 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Oct 25, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Ivan wrote:
For the samples, why not we create a seperate code base
Finally, get the gpg plugin work, after hard coding my password in the codes
:-( Will continue to the next step ...
2010/10/26 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
After updating many files in the 3.0.* branch, I could run mvn
release:prepare, and 3.0.3 tag was created, but I was blocked by running mvn
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.3
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Ivan
While running mvn -Prat -Dmaven.test.skip=true, you might need to comment
out one line in the rat profile, moduledeps/module.
Personally, I do not think that this is an serious issue, so I still begun
the vote.
Thanks.
2010/10/26 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB
not
sure
if this is a blocking issue (my guess is that if everything actually works
and its just a test failure its not a big problem) - just thought I'd
mention it.
Jon
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.3, comparing
--
Ivan
-SNAPSHOT. Thoughts ?
Thanks.
2010/10/22 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi,
After the discussion in the thread
http://osdir.com/ml/dev.openejb.apache.org/2010-10/msg00042.html , I would
like to be the volunteer for the OpenEJB 3.0.3.
I am planning to try it in next Monday, before that, I would
change trunk.
Thoughts?
-David
--
Ivan
://jaceklaskowski.pl
Komitet organizacyjny warsjawa 2010 - http://warsjawa.pl
--
Ivan
in this release.
Thanks.
--
Ivan
Yes, I have a GPG public key. Will add it to the KEYS files later.
Do we have a guide for the release work ? Or just a normal step with release
plugin.
thanks.
2010/10/21 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Oct 17, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Although there is only one JIRA
Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ivan
.
whitespace is a legal value here.
thanks
david jencks
--
Ivan
it eats interceptors that are defined on superclasses.
WDYT?
I will create an issue and attach patch if my observations are correct.
Regards;
--Gurkan
--
Ivan
the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ivan
the quick
rename after that. Throwing it out now to give time for input. We might
want to apply any outstanding patches before doing the rename.
Thoughts?
-David
--
Ivan
save some time.
--
Karan Singh Malhi
--
Ivan
of those come from
other parts of Apache.
Ivan,
You're all setup in svn and JIRA! Give your commit a try.
-David
--
Ivan
.
These were small though, so if you wanted to branch off now, it would be
easy to merge.
-David
--
Ivan
Hi, David
I updated the patch files for local and remote asynchronous support to
OpenEJB-1165, and they work on my local machine. If any comment, please shot
me an email, thanks !
2010/8/5 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Hi, David
I have uploaded a patch for local asynchronous support, and attach
Hi, David
I have uploaded a patch for local asynchronous support, and attach it to
OpenEJB-1165, some changes are made comparing with the draft patch, please
check the commets in the JIRA. Also, do you have further comments on the
remote asynchrouns support ?
Thanks !
2010/7/28 Ivan xhh
for @Stateful beans, then moving on to EJB 3.1 features like
@AccessTimeout support and partial @StatefulTimeout support and helping
flush out @DependsOn bugs.
Ivan: You've been doing fantastic work since May. First with the
MemoryTimerStore fixes, then some great EJB 3.1 features like
static class BarBean {
+
+public void foo(javax.ejb.Timer timer) {}
+
+@Timeout
+public void foo() {}
+}
+
+}
--
Ivan
, not sure what the getAfterBegin()
is
for. Same is the case with beforeCompletion and afterCompletion.
--
Karan Singh Malhi
--
Karan Singh Malhi
--
Karan Singh Malhi
--
Ivan
21, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Ivan wrote:
Or maybe we could have a reference in the ThreadContext for the next
ThreadContext in the invocation chain ?
Hmm. Maybe we just go simple and hook the wasCancelCalled method up to its
own ThreadLocalAtomicBoolean. Having more thread locals is generally
)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:289)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:993)
--
Ivan
will fix the failed case.
2010/7/23 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
I have tried it on both linux and windows, not seen this error. But I have
no Mac on hand, just create a debug patch, it contains some output while
sorting the elements. If anyone has time to try it and paste the outputs
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:289)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:993)
--
Ivan
in the
RpcContainer which accepts a preconstruct ThreadContext.
Do you have any better idea ? Thanks !
2010/7/16 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, seems that there are still some work required for the Asynchronous
support.
If no one had begun the work, I
;
--Gurkan
From: David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Thu, July 15, 2010 5:02:43 AM
Subject: Re: EJB 3.1 @Schedule support
On Jul 14, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, David:
I am thinking that since the persistent
to support the xml version of
@Asynchronous.
No worries if you're too busy, we can dump the task back into the
available pool.
Really nice and clean patch!
-David
--
Ivan
Hi, David:
I am thinking that since the persistent support is not included in the
web profile, maybe I could try to work on those features belong to EJB 3.1
Lite. Not sure how many features have been covered, hope to get some
comments from you.
Thanks !
2010/7/14 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
features. About the
persistent support, as you mentioned, it is not of high priority, I will
check whether we could take advantage of Quartz.
Thanks !
2010/7/8 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jul 7, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, David:
Thanks for the info. Currently, most codes
to
pass, we'll be in good shape.
Hey Ivan,
Saw your patch for the stable reference sorting (OPENEJB-1309). Pretty
great stuff! It's better than Dain's algorithm -- those that know Dain know
how much of a compliment that is.
Going to commit it right away. As we chatted on IRC, turning
for it. Another ways is to create our own way to do it, use text
file, db or something else. Any comment for it ?
2010/6/25 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
Hey Ivan,
As you're probably noticing already, the @Schedule support was attempted
before. I had basically written most of the deployment
a note either way and I'll
assign it to you.
-David
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: dblev...@visi.com
From: Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Date: June 18, 2010 2:19:49 AM PDT
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to invoke the ejbTimeout method ?
Reply-To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Thanks, David, it is a good choice to add a new InterfaceType. I have
attached the patch to OpenEJB-1221, if any problem, please let me know.
2010/6/18 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
While working with AroundTimeout implementation, I
this .
2010/6/13 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
I did't get it.
If the data is cleared, the ejb client will lose the connection info to
other nodes. As a result, there will be no failover. Is a expected
behavior for a clustering ?
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote
them coming! It's a good way to fill out anything that isn't
completely clear.
Thanks, Viola!
-David
--
Ivan
, it would
make the users ( at least me :-) ) feel confusion, the ejb client connects
to other servers due to the specified server is down some time before.
Thoughts ?
--
Ivan
Hi, David :
Seems that we could do the samething for AroundTimeout, if no one has
begun the work, could you assign the JIRA OpenEJB-1172 to me ? I could like
to work on it.
Thanks !
2010/6/9 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
2010/6/9 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:40
2010/6/9 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Ivan wrote:
Thanks for the comment, I attach another patch to the JIRA, if any
problem,
please let me know :-)
Wow. Wonderful patch, Ivan! Doesn't really get any better than that :)
Very thorough test case
);
ConfigurationFactory config = new ConfigurationFactory();
Assembler assembler = new Assembler();
--
Ivan
Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
Hi Ivan!
On Jun 3, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi, David:
Thanks for your advice.
a. While trying to treat the session synchronization methods in the
same
way as those bean lifecycle method, I encounter an issue. For the
afterCompletion method
Thanks for the comment, I attach another patch to the JIRA, if any problem,
please let me know :-)
2010/6/8 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Ivan wrote:
I have finished most of the codes, but after I modeled all the session
synchronization callbacks
Hi, devs:
I went thought some discussion about using Quartz in the past, seems
that a decsion has been made to use Quartz as the underlying provider for
timer related features. Is it right ? If does, I would like to try to work
on it if no other members have not taken it.
Thanks !
--
Ivan
Hi, devs:
I attached a patch to OpenEJB-1147, it contains support for those new
session synchronization, please help to review it when you are available.
By the way, could anyone add me to the contribution list, so that I could
assign the JIRA to myself :-)
Thanks !
2010/5/27 Ivan xhh
Hi devs :
I hope to try to do some contributions to the OpenEJB project, I found
a JIRA OPENEJB-1133, it seems to list some unimplemented functions for EJB
3.1. I hope that someone could show me some start points ?
Thanks !
--
Ivan
I might give up to merge it to the coming Geronimo 2.1.5 :-(
2010/3/29 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Ivan wrote:
Please ignore my previous request, it might not completly fix the issue I
wanted
these binaries pass the TCK, here is my +1 vote.
Vote open for 72 hours or as long as it takes to get some TCK numbers
against the proposed binaries.
-David
--
Ivan
. Anyway, I would remove the strict option setting from Geronimo
soon.
2009/7/18 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Many thanks, David !
I will let you know the results as soon as possible ^_^
2009/7/18 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
Ok the logic for business interface processing is in there and looking
and straight forward. I recommend
everyone update and take a look at the AnnotationDeployer's
processSessionInterfaces() method and let me know what you think. I can
document it more while it's still fresh in my head, so do feel encouraged to
say what's this part about, etc.
Ivan, this seems
Great !
Thanks, David.
2009/7/9 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jun 14, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Ivan wrote:
2009/6/11 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
With the latest openejb 3.1.1 snapshot, I found if the env property
and patches are easily overlooked. Also, if it is a TCK
related issue, definitely feel encouraged to post the related test names to
the Geronimo TCK list.
Keep up the great work, Ivan!
-David
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Ivan wrote:
A testcase is attached to 1042.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/24
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
