Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)

+1 Jeff On Dec 10, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Additional information > > Release Notes: > http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/releasenotes-1.5.1.html > > Rat report: > http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/rat-1.5.1.txt > > Binaries comparison re

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.5.0/TomEE 1.5.0 (staging-060)

+1 Jeff On Sep 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, David Blevins wrote: > TCK run from trunk post-change passed. A run from the staging-060 binaries > is in progress and looks good. Build looks good. > > Here's my +1 > > > -David > > On Sep 28, 2012, at 4:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote: > >> [gene

Re: [VOTE] Vishwanath Krishnamurthi as committer

+1 Jeff On Nov 30, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > All is in the subject :) > > Vishwa has been very active to enhance our documentation and to create our > brand new website. > He also contributed some examples, etc. > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more).

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (3rd Try)

Doh... but not PMC... but I didnt see my name... Jeff On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:38 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > and I threw in a +1 too, eh? ;-) > > Jeff > > On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:29 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> New I forgot something :) >> >> Throw me in

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (3rd Try)

enEJB 3.0.4 vote passed with the following votes >> +1 Jacek Laskowski, Karan Malhi, Jeff Genender, Daniel, Romain Manni-Bucau, >> Ivan >> +0 AndyG, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> no -1 >> Thanks, everyone, I will promote the artifacts soon. >> >> 2011/10/27 Ivan

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (3rd Try)

+1 Jeff On Oct 23, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > +1 > > Jacek > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Ivan wrote: >> Hi, >>Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the >> incoming Geronimo 2.1.8. >>Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are in

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenEJB 4.0.0-beta-1 and Apache TomEE 1.0.0-beta-1 (2nd try)

+1 Jeff On Oct 1, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > +1 > > -dain > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Jonathan Gallimore > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Jon >> >> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:52 PM, dsh wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Cheers >>> Daniel >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:17 AM, David Ble

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)

+1 Jeff On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote: > Hi, >Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the > incoming Geronimo 2.1.8. >Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included : > >OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed >OPENEJB

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4

ase plugin, that makes me > feel confusion > > 2011/9/23 Jeff Genender > >> grep -r -l SNAPSHOT * >> >> ;-) >> >> Jeff >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Ivan wrote: >> >>> I may miss something in the release process, there

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4

grep -r -l SNAPSHOT * ;-) Jeff On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Ivan wrote: > I may miss something in the release process, there are still some SNAPSHOT > not removed in the pom files. Thanks for pointing it out, Jon ! > > 2011/9/23 Ivan > >> Thanks, Jonathan, no sure why there is still 3.0.4-S

Re: [VOTE] javaee-api 6.0-1 (take 1)

+1… yay! Jeff On Sep 3, 2011, at 6:56 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Totally OK with me if this vote doesn't go through as there was little > discussion beforehand, but we've all known it needed to go out so I figured > it'd just give a release attempt a try and maybe save a couple days. It's a

Re: [VOTE] Romain Manni-Bucau as committer

+1 Jeff On May 22, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is > welcome to vote. > > Here's my +1 > > > -David >

Re: [VOTE] Shawn Jiang as committer

+1 Jeff On May 22, 2011, at 6:58 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is > welcome to vote. > > Here's my +1 > > > -David

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.1.4 release (take 3)

+1 Jeff On Nov 17, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Looks good to me. +1 > > Checked signature/checksum, source, and build -- all looked good. > > --kevan > > On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:19 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Oooo-kaaay. Thanks everyone so much for the patience. Here we have >

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.1.4 release

+1 Jeff On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:03 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok. This one should be pretty quick -- not too many changes. > > Repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-005/ > > Binaries: > > http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote1/ > > Branc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.3

+1 Jeff On Oct 26, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Ivan wrote: > Hi, >Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.3, comparing with the last version, > only one JIRA is included : > >OPENEJB-1320 xa recovery on inbound resource adapters > >binary repository : > https://repository.apache.org/content/re

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.1.3 release (try 3)

+1 Jeff On Oct 15, 2010, at 9:17 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Round 3, up and ready. > > Repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-005/ > > Binaries: > > http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-005/3.1.3/ > > Branch (to become a tag): > > http://svn.

Re: [VOTE] Andy Gumbrecht as committer

+1 Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Aug 22, 2010, at 6:51 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Subject says it all :) > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is > welcome to vote. > > Here's my +1 > > > -David >

Re: [VOTE] Ivan Xu as committer

+1 Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Aug 22, 2010, at 6:48 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Subject says it all :) > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is > welcome to vote. > > Here's my +1 > > > -David >

Re: [VOTE] Thiago Veronezi as committer

+1 Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Aug 22, 2010, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Subject says it all :) > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is > welcome to vote. > > Here's my +1 > > > -David >

Re: [VOTE] Adding Kevan Miller to the PMC

+1 On Jul 30, 2010, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: > +1 > david jencks > > On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:41 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Per the "More oversight" discussion: >> >> http://s.apache.org/uc0 >> >> Here's the vote for adding Kevan Miller to the PMC so he can assist in >> providing lega

Re: [VOTE] Adding Jean-Louis to the PMC

+1 On Jul 30, 2010, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: > +1 > david jencks > > On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:38 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Per the "More oversight" discussion: >> >> http://s.apache.org/uc0 >> >> Here's the vote for adding Jean-Louis Monteiro to the PMC so he can assist >> in providi

Re: [VOTE] Jarek Gawor as committer

+1 Jeff On May 10, 2010, at 3:21 PM, David Blevins wrote: > This is long overdue, but better late than never :) > > Jarek has been on the sidelines supporting the Geronimo integration for quite > some time. With the work going on in Geronimo 3.0 around OSGi and Java EE 6, > we're going to ne

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0.2 (take 2)

+1 Jeff On Apr 3, 2010, at 1:28 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: +1 -dain On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:25 PM, David Blevins wrote: Applied Jon's assembly patch and merged in a little plugin config for having the maven assembly plugin execute the tar/zip commands rather than me doing it manually. No

Re: Devoxx 2009

ZOMG... yes David, your impression of James was second to none... memories, memories ;-) Jeff On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:23 AM, David Blevins wrote: I won't be there, but I see a lot of familiar faces on the speaker list. Buy James Strachan a beer for me, it's been way too long since I've h

Re: Voting policies for committers and PMC - was: [VOTE] Adding Jon to the PMC

On Jul 12, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 12, 2009, at 8:29 PM, David Blevins wrote: Q. Voting on people: Is it hard to vote -1 in public / Can someone get their feelings hurt ? Yes and yes. Voting in public requires greater care and sensitivity on behalf of everyone; t

Re: Voting policies for committers and PMC - was: [VOTE] Adding Jon to the PMC

#x27;t missing anything major and generally captures the ideas of the group, I'll throw it into the wiki and people can go in and make any wording tweaks they like as well as any other cleanup. I'll give it a while for lazy consensus before doing so. -David On Jul 12, 2009, at

Voting policies for committers and PMC - was: [VOTE] Adding Jon to the PMC

wiki. This question had come up before on the mailing lists and it seems nebulous as to the rules for the project. Comments in-line below... On Jul 11, 2009, at 3:10 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Jul 11, 2009, at 4:38 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: David, Voting as a committer, Jon certainly gets

Re: [VOTE] Adding Jon to the PMC

David, Voting as a committer, Jon certainly gets my +1 to be a PMC individual. But this vote seems strange whereby committers are voting on PMC membership. Can you be a bit more specific on the voting of people into the PMC? OpenEJB seems to have a different set of rules and it would be

Re: [VOTE] Jean-Louis as committer

+1 On Jun 15, 2009, at 3:09 PM, David Blevins wrote: Subject is self-explanitory :) Vote time! Here's my +1 for making Jean-Louis a committer. Jean-Louis, we're lucky to have you! I look forward to seeing you take on the roll of helping future new contributors become committers. You're

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.1.1 (take 3)

+1 On May 30, 2009, at 9:46 PM, David Blevins wrote: Successful Windows results - http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage3/windows-sunjdk16.txt Successful OSX results - http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage3/osx-jdk15.txt Nuff said. Here's my +1 We're ready to roll! -David On May 3

Re: 3.1.1 Windows failures

Per my +1 in the vote... I don't have Windows. Jeff On May 29, 2009, at 4:44 AM, David Blevins wrote: On May 29, 2009, at 2:58 AM, David Blevins wrote: On May 29, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Not sure how much I can

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.1.1

+1 On May 28, 2009, at 6:58 PM, David Blevins wrote: All looks good OSX with Mac JDK 1.5 and 1.6. Here's my +1 -- David On May 28, 2009, at 4:58 PM, David Blevins wrote: Ok. At long last the binaries are ready! All was rat scanned[1] for missing headers; there were a few and all that ne

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.1 take 1

+1 On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: +1 -dain On Oct 14, 2008, at 3:54 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Oct 12, 2008, at 11:56 PM, David Blevins wrote: +1 from me pending the windows tests passing. So far, I've tested the following: OpenEJB Standalone Tomcat 6.0.14 Tomcat 6

Re: Heads up -- shading asm deps

Ahhh... very cool ;-) Jeff On Aug 8, 2008, at 7:19 PM, David Blevins wrote: Using the maven shade plugin to repackage. -David On Aug 8, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: What do you mean by "inlining"? I'm interested in what you mean when the only way I know how

Re: Heads up -- shading asm deps

What do you mean by "inlining"? I'm interested in what you mean when the only way I know how to isolate the dependencies is through the classloader. Jeff On Aug 8, 2008, at 6:00 PM, David Blevins wrote: Heads up that I'll be inlining the asm jars so that others (like hibernate) using oth

Re: [VOTE] Jonathan as committer

+1 Alan D. Cabrera wrote: +1 Regards, Alan On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:00 PM, David Blevins wrote: Alright, vote time :) Our dear Mr. Gallimore has done a fantastic job on the tooling to turn ejb 2.x apps into 3.0 apps which turned quickly into a pretty cool Eclipse plugin. Above that Jonath

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)

+1 Jacek Laskowski wrote: > +1 > > Jacek > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:51 AM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run early >> this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run the itests on >> standalone and a doz

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-2

+1 Sent from my iPhone On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:09 AM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's here..! At long last we are near the finish line for 3.0- beta-2! Assembled "distro" directory to be copied to /www/www.apache.org/dist/openejb/ : http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/

Re: Thoughts on EJB3 tools OpenEJB integrate with

amera 2', etc. > > Hokay, back to my entity bean mappings, fellows. > -- > Alex > > > > On Dec 14, 2007 4:54 PM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Wow...very creative and impressive. I never would have thought about >> doing a seam

Re: Thoughts on EJB3 tools OpenEJB integrate with

crashy so don't recommend it for compression at this > time. Hopefully this helps Dain & David with their Doco efforts. > > Cheers, > -- > Alex > > > On Dec 14, 2007 1:35 PM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Look into Snapz Pro...th

Re: Thoughts on EJB3 tools OpenEJB integrate with

a hardware to get started. > > I bought a compression program called "Stomp" along with iShowU and tried it > out, but it seems a bit crashy so don't recommend it for compression at this > time. Hopefully this helps Dain & David with their Doco efforts. > > Ch

Re: Thoughts on EJB3 tools OpenEJB integrate with

Look into Snapz Pro...that was made for what you want to do. Although what Alexander built was pretty cool. I'd like to know how he swapped from a face shot to the iShowU so smoothly and how the mouse clicks got dubbed in. Pretty cool stuff. Jeff Dain Sundstrom wrote: > Wow that is sweet! > >

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenEJB 3.0-beta-1

+1 Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > +1 > > It was ibiblio. Builds fine now. > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Sep 28, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> -1 >> >> I cannot build from SVN. The itest-beans module has a dep >> hsqldb:hsqldb:jar:1.8.0.7 that cannot be found. >> >> >> Regards, >>

Re: How to upload m2 artifacts for review/vote?

mvn package scp ./target/openejb-X.X-SNAPSHOT.jar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:public_html/ Jeff Jacek Laskowski wrote: > Hi, > > Some of the projects I've been following upload their m2 artifact to a > private area (e.g. http://people.apache.org/~jlaskowski) to let people > review and vote before these ar

Re: Karan as committer

+1 David Blevins wrote: > Hello All, > > We've got a real gem community member in our midst doing some really > fantastic work. Mr Karan Singh Malhi has managed to squeeze > documentation from the depths of our archives, inspired some very > detailed discussions (also resulting in documentation)

Re: creating validation messages from source

Purty cool! ;-) Jeff David Blevins wrote: > > On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> So what is it, out of interest? > > Using it now to get me started on the new i18n messages for the > validation rules I've whipped up. Spits out t

Re: creating validation messages from source

So what is it, out of interest? Jeff David Blevins wrote: > Sending this to the list for backup purposes :) Not intended to be > understood :) > > I'm sure if I stick it in a script on my machine I'll loose it and then > in another year when I want to do it again I'll never remember where I > p

Re: Commons DBCP

Jacek Laskowski wrote: > On 7/12/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If we like DBCP, I think we should drop the JCA based JDBC code and >> throw our hat in with the commons team. > > I can't claim I like DBCP, but if it easies openejb configuration I'm > for it. Why don't you l

Re: Commons DBCP

Great idea! +1. Jeff Dain Sundstrom wrote: > In the OPENEJB-606, I've added a patch that converts the default data > sources in OpenEJB to use Commons DBCP instead of the OpenEJB > JdbcManagedConnection and SharedLocalConnectionManager. With this patch > applied we can use the configuration pro

Re: Final Castor XML to JaxB conversion

Sounds like a great plan... Jeff Dain Sundstrom wrote: > I'm working on converting the org.apache.openejb.config.sys from Castor > XML to JaxB. I believe this is our last required dependency on Castor > (there is an optional Castor CMP implementation), so when I finish we > will be able to remov

Re: irc

I believe #openejb on irc.freenode.net. Jeff Karan Malhi wrote: > Do we have an IRC channel for openejb? >

OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble

Hi, I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists. We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building. First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2, and second, I am fairly confident this is going t

Re: Clustering JIRA

ring be a separate module or would the API/SPI be added to > an existing module? > > On 6/20/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I started entering clustering JIRAs to track some to-do items to get >> this clustering SPI/API going. Plea

Clustering JIRA

Hi, I started entering clustering JIRAs to track some to-do items to get this clustering SPI/API going. Please feel free to add on to this list as we can make it as finite as needed. The containing JIRA is: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-596 We can change/add/remove some of the s

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

//incubator.apache.org/wadi/index.html - so it can play >>> as our >>> clustering infrastructure ???. Jeff comments ??? >>> >>> On 6/16/07, Gianny Damour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 15/06/2007, at 6:39 AM, Jeff Genender

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Paulo Lopes wrote: > Another issue that hasn't been discussed is what happens when the > nodes are not synchronized? I deploy a EJB on node #1 but my initial > context sends me to node #2... if we are talking about clustering we > need also to consider a change on the deployer so it deploys any n

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

question is shouldn't this cluster thing be a separate server? (I > think so, but from what i've understand from the discussion it seems > it will be embedded in the main OEJB server code). > > On 6/15/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

The key here is to flush out the basic protocol for communicating a list...some list...to the clients. How it fails over, etc, can be done at the point of implementation. Jeff > > On 6/14/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Right...I would agree random is best as th

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

reverse and > implement something then test it, and we may find ourselves not being able > to test, may be cauze of the way we implemented it. > > On 6/14/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Yep...I think a pluggable policy is the way to go. >> >>

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Yep...I think a pluggable policy is the way to go. Jeff Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > On 6/14/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 14, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: >> > >> > Manu George wrote: >> >> Ye

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Right...I would agree random is best as the default since it utilizes the best load balanced solution. Jeff David Blevins wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: >> >> Manu George wrote: >>> Yes I understand that random will work but how about

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

ted on to it. Round robin and random are both fairly simple to implement. Jeff > > On 6/14/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Manu George wrote: >> > As per what I understood if one of the servers are down then the >> > client

Re: Openeb Box.

If you attached something, I dont think it made it through as an attachment. Jeff Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Here you are :-) > > On 6/14/07, *Mohammad Nour El-Din* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Sure, we should have one, my brother is a graphics and web desi

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Manu George wrote: > As per what I understood if one of the servers are down then the > client will call the next one in the list which would send it a new id > after which all calls will be to that one. You are assuming no policy for how a client chooses a server and that its linear. Consider

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Paulo Lopes wrote: > The idea of id download on the first connection doesn't seem nice to > me. Assume the following scenario: > > you have a cluster of 3 servers, and the 3 are aware of the other by > their internal configuration. (no discovery inside the cluster). This not a correct assumpti

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Just to make sure I am following this subject right. > > The client is going to have a servers list, and initially it will be > attached to a server, lets say the server which created this client > interface, and if for instance this server failed over the client is

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

lichtner wrote: > Are you going to save the version number to disk for when you want to shut > the whole cluster down? No...it will not be saved. It will be recalculated on any changes to the nodes. Jeff > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > >> On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:19 AM, Matt H

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

to go to the client. i.e. if I have 20 servers in my cluster, I don't want to send that list on every call...only when the list changes (entry or exit from a cluster). This is a lightweight way to notify the client when it needs a refresh. Jeff > On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:35 PM, Je

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

David Blevins wrote: > I think that might have been an Amelia "no" (i.e. a yes). Hehe! I know that "No" too ;-) > You saying > you like the idea of the server sending the md5 down and having the > client simply send it back, no inspection on the client side -- i.e. the > version number idea f

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

David Blevins wrote: > > I guess we never really talked about how each server would get the list > of peers in the cluster. Depending on how we do that, we could return > to the md5'ed list idea but not the way it was proposed where the hash > would be calculated by both sides on every request

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

te a version number across servers, so its in-sync based on the cluster state. But Mr Blevins talked me out of this ;-) > > On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> Ok...so now that we have passed the TCK...I can get back and concentrate >> on some fun stuff, so

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Dain Sundstrom wrote: > If the version number isn't shared amongst all servers, then I would > think the version number will need to contain a server identifier to > avoid the case where the client fails over and old (dead) server > happened to be on the same version as the new server. Why would

Re: The clustering discussion - again ;-)

ence to the server its speaking to. If a client needs to fail-over to a new server, it will get a new list and version number...so I believe it works...but good question nevertheless. ;-) Jeff > > On 6/12/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ok...so now that

The clustering discussion - again ;-)

Ok...so now that we have passed the TCK...I can get back and concentrate on some fun stuff, so I wanted to bring up the old discussion again of getting a clustering API pinned up on OpenEJB. The whole idea on this is to allow different clustering components to tie into the product. Before I stopp