Re: Include+Exclude vs Exclude+Include

2011-03-28 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
79440.n4.nabble.com/Include-Exclude-vs-Exclude-Include-tp3403891p3410934.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Include+Exclude vs Exclude+Include

2011-03-26 Thread David Blevins
>> >> org.superbiz >> org.wonderbiz >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me get straight to the point and say I'm not sure an exclude based >> approach is useful. Factually, whichever has the fewes

Re: Include+Exclude vs Exclude+Include

2011-03-24 Thread Rniamo
org.wonderbiz > > > > > > > Let me get straight to the point and say I'm not sure an exclude based > approach is useful. Factually, whichever has the fewest rules will be > faster. Our current classpath filtering has a lot of built-in rules we

Include+Exclude vs Exclude+Include

2011-03-24 Thread David Blevins
ou actually use it. I copied the Include+Exclude vs Exclude+Include from HTTPD. They call it Allow,Deny vs Deny,Allow. The names and descriptions are not great and people clearly misunderstand them. Here's how they have them documented: Ordering is one of: Allow,Deny