done a first version of it
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/1/2 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
An app always exist, the default one is
You mentioned it breaks the config. Can you write up some before and after
examples of that?
Note, we've never ever broken config without still supporting the previous
version. We supported the OpenEJB 2.x config for years.
Part of the reason I was on the conservative side when we were
Sounds like we have a clear path for compatibility. If someone is configuring
endpoints, we do it the old way. If someone is configuring Applications, we do
it that way.
Question though on the new way. How does one configure an endpoint if no
application exists and they just have endpoints
An app always exist, the default one is jaxrs-application.
The test can work. Important update to do is to read the boolean in app
properties too and not only system ones
Le 2 janv. 2013 20:00, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
Sounds like we have a clear path for compatibility.
Hi guys,
i plan next year (hope to get it done for mid january) to change the
default rest deployment
the idea is to deploy a jaxrs Application instead of deploying each
endpoint (== give the Application to cxf)
the main reason is to simply reuse the rest routing instead of relying
on the
it will affect you only if you used openejb-jar.xml to configure providers etc
if not (putting providers in Application classes for instance) no change.
that's said with the property you can switch back to the old deployment
i still not started to work on it (and it will wait some days) so i'm
just pushed the first part
still need some more work but basically solve the routing issue
will continue on thursday i think
any feedback before will be helpful
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
