localhost is still working with
it otherwise it can be a big security issue.
But good job Thiago!
- Romain
2012/2/16 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org
Guys,
I am working on the
TOMEE-130https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-130 task.
Please code review the java code I
Hi,
Fyi openejb.xml is called tomee.xml by default in tomee.
- Romain
-- Message transféré --
De : vishwana...@apache.org
Date : 17 févr. 2012 01:21
Objet : svn commit: r1245261 -
/openejb/site/trunk/content/tomee-directory-structure.mdtext
À : comm...@openejb.apache.org
Author
oh ok.
..about the log file ? Is that tomee.log ?
-Vishwa
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-svn-commit-r1245261-openejb-site-trunk-content-tomee-directory-structure-mdtext-tp4395929p4396070.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive
We merged with catalina one.
Le 17 févr. 2012 02:46, stratwine tovishwan...@gmail.com a écrit :
oh ok.
..about the log file ? Is that tomee.log ?
-Vishwa
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-svn-commit-r1245261-openejb-site-trunk-content-tomee
Is anyone actively working on the TOMEE-130: Improve openejb webapp
console to match current site look and feel? I just figured out how to use
the current look and feel in the current application.
[]s,
Thiago.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
On Feb 14, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
Is anyone actively working on the TOMEE-130: Improve openejb webapp
console to match current site look and feel? I just figured out how to use
the current look and feel in the current application.
Go for it!
-David
On Thu, Feb 9
, but I think MIT is
fine for Apache 2.0 projects.
+1
[]s,
Thiago
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:06 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Concerning TOMEE-130 - Would it make sense to decouple the UI from the
remaining webapp logic? For example it could just emit JSON data
accesible through
for Apache 2.0 projects.
+1
[]s,
Thiago
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:06 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Concerning TOMEE-130 - Would it make sense to decouple the UI from the
remaining webapp logic? For example it could just emit JSON data
accesible through a REST API
Concerning TOMEE-130 - Would it make sense to decouple the UI from the
remaining webapp logic? For example it could just emit JSON data
accesible through a REST API. That way we could have a 2nd webapp that
only does the UI or have an OpenSocial container such as Apache
Shinding that would consume
/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomcat-openejb-remote/
openejb/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-common/
openejb/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-remote/
openejb/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-...
To: comm...@openejb.apache.org
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Thu Feb 2 11:30:04 2012
New Revision
Seen, beat me to it
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-svn-commit-r1239550-in-openejb-trunk-openejb-openejb-arquillian-tomee-arquillian-tomcat-openejb-n-tp4351264p4351536.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-openejb-arquillian-tomee-arquillian-tomcat-openejb-n-tp4351264p4351536.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
just as a reminder for TOMEE-130 i started
http://code.google.com/p/rmannibucau/source/browse#hg%2Fopenejb%2Ftomee-webapp-ng
but
it needs some jsf love.
for tomee-132: karafee has such a command and tomee maven plugin too, +1
for tomee.sh
tomee-133: should already be done
+1 for tomee-134
and some
in the VmDeploymentManager.
-David
On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
just as a reminder for TOMEE-130 i started
http://code.google.com/p/rmannibucau/source/browse#hg%2Fopenejb%2Ftomee-webapp-ng
but
it needs some jsf love.
for tomee-132: karafee has
the tck setup as well. It
had quite a lot of references to the openejb webapp.
There's a bunch in the groovy classes for setting up classpaths and some
in the VmDeploymentManager.
-David
On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
just as a reminder for TOMEE-130 i started
Come on guys, no one wants to take more than two beers together?
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-OpenEJB-TomEE-Get-Together-2012-tp4313559p4343779.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
just as a reminder for TOMEE-130 i started
http://code.google.com/p/rmannibucau/source/browse#hg%2Fopenejb%2Ftomee-webapp-ng
but
it needs some jsf love.
for tomee-132: karafee has such a command and tomee maven plugin too, +1
for tomee.sh
tomee-133: should already be done
+1 for tomee-134
My problem is there is no such thing as 'only' two beers... two leads to
three leads to ...say ten on a good night
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-OpenEJB-TomEE-Get-Together-2012-tp4313559p4343882.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive
this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-OpenEJB-TomEE-Get-Together-2012-tp4313559p4343882.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-OpenEJB-TomEE-Get-Together-2012-tp4313559p4343779.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
As Russians say, Reality is an illusion, caused by the lack of alcohol.
-Original Message-
From: dsh [mailto:daniel.hais...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:20 AM
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache OpenEJB/TomEE Get-Together 2012
Jean-Louis,
you didn't
, 2012 11:20 AM
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache OpenEJB/TomEE Get-Together 2012
Jean-Louis,
you didn't consider that some write there best code at least after the
3rd beer or beyond ;)
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Come
, Reality is an illusion, caused by the lack of alcohol.
-Original Message-
From: dsh [mailto:daniel.hais...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:20 AM
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache OpenEJB/TomEE Get-Together 2012
Jean-Louis,
you didn't consider
can be found here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/maven-plugins/tomee-maven-plugin/
goals:
- mvn tomee:help: some help
- mvn tomee:configtest: run configtest on the tomcat
- mvn tomee:deploy -Dtomee-plugin.archive=some-path: deploy the app
located at some-path (tomee
What config does configtest test (logging, server.xml, openejb.xml,
fooservice.properties, etc) and how does it do it?
-David
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
can be found here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/maven-plugins/tomee-maven-plugin/
goals
I didnt dig too much into it but it should be server.xml file. It is a
tomcat feature, not a tomee one: catalina.sh configtest
- Romain
Le 31 janv. 2012 00:18, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
What config does configtest test (logging, server.xml, openejb.xml
Maybe add it to the moviefun webapp. Could be neat to show in a demo.
-David
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I didnt dig too much into it but it should be server.xml file. It is a
tomcat feature, not a tomee one: catalina.sh configtest
- Romain
Le 31 janv. 2012
Isnt it the case on trunk?
-- Message transféré --
De : David Blevins (Created) (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date : 31 janv. 2012 01:19
Objet : [jira] [Created] (TOMEE-133) TomEE logs/openejb.log should be
merged with the rest of Tomcat logging
À : comm...@openejb.apache.org
TomEE logs
Thought these might be some good discussion points/improvements for TomEE.
- TOMEE-130: Improve openejb webapp console to match current site look and feel
- TOMEE-131: The openejb.xml file should be called tomee.xml in TomEE
- TOMEE-132: Make it easier to use command line deployer in TomEE
for TomEE.
- TOMEE-130: Improve openejb webapp console to match current site look
and feel
- TOMEE-131: The openejb.xml file should be called tomee.xml in TomEE
- TOMEE-132: Make it easier to use command line deployer in TomEE
- TOMEE-133: TomEE logs/openejb.log should be merged with the rest
Forwarding to the dev list so hopefully we can get more eyes on it.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
Subject: tomee (b2) and codi
Date: January 25, 2012 7:20:35 AM PST
To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
hi david,
... the names would fit
hi @ all,
fyi:
romain found the issue - thx!
at [1] you can find a short description and how to resolve it with beta2.
i also added tomee to [2].
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://os890.blogspot.com/2012/01/codi-meets-tomee.html
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Intro#Intro
(BCC'ed all committers)
Retweets encouraged!
https://twitter.com/#!/ApacheTomEE/statuses/161903294216806400
-David
Only works for http traffic (no email), but it's active
http://tomee.apache.org
Just an alias for openejb.apache.org of course, but should save on some time in
articles explaining why people need to go to openejb to download the Java EE
server they heard about.
-David
Ok, vote closes with 6 +1s and no other votes:
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Jonathan Gallimore
Romain Manni-Bucau
Thiago Veronezi
Have pushed the binaries. Let's give it a few hours to sync.
Will update the downloads page and draft up a blog post tomorrow as
Forgot to use the official header :)
On Jan 23, 2012, at 3:49 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok, vote closes with 6 +1s and no other votes:
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Jonathan Gallimore
Romain Manni-Bucau
Thiago Veronezi
Have pushed the binaries. Let's
+1
Jon
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
All checked with Romain.
Did not notice something wrong either in binaries or in sources.
BTW, we saw a bug in JAX-RS integration. This is not a blocking reason IMO.
If i'm wrong, lemme know.
We
will be able to celebrate the first
here of Apache TomEE (ie the first Apache TomEE get-together ;-))
You can't miss that!
Thoughts?
Jean-Louis
together
and when.
This year gonna be very special as we will be able to celebrate the first
here of Apache TomEE (ie the first Apache TomEE get-together ;-))
You can't miss that!
Of course I'm in regardless of when or where, so if others have thoughts, let's
hear them.
-David
Hi,
All checked with Romain.
Did not notice something wrong either in binaries or in sources.
BTW, we saw a bug in JAX-RS integration. This is not a blocking reason IMO.
If i'm wrong, lemme know.
We can re roll a new beta by the end of January or work for a final version
in February hopefully.
+1 (tested on OSX only)
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:06 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-2/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-075
Hi guys,
just added a small feature (i called the module openejb-provisionning but
i'm not sure it is relevant) to be able to use in our deployer something
else than a file location.
i added the maven support through paxurl.
to make it work:
1) download tomee
2) extract openejb-provisionning
TCK looks good.
Here's my +1
-David
On Jan 16, 2012, at 7:06 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-2/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-075
my +1
[]s,
Thiago.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:03 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
TCK looks good.
Here's my +1
-David
On Jan 16, 2012, at 7:06 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
+1
- Romain
2012/1/18 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org
my +1
[]s,
Thiago.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:03 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
TCK looks good.
Here's my +1
-David
On Jan 16, 2012, at 7:06 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
Minor nitpick: Archive is called
apache-tomee-version.qualifier-edition.zip where the extracted
directory is called apache-tomee-edition-version.qualifier.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:59 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-2/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-075
Binaries Source:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-075/openejb-4.0.0-beta-2/
Legal:
, at 6:08 AM, AndyG wrote:
Still the same, something has changed since yesterday morning that is causing
the test tomee to try and bind to port 0 - Trying to figure out what.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2
wrote:
Still the same, something has changed since yesterday morning that is
causing
the test tomee to try and bind to port 0 - Trying to figure out what.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4292230.html
I am now getting the following, is there a missing or modified default port
configuration somewhere?:
Running org.apache.openejb.arquillian.session.SessionScopeTest
[] START SERVER
OPENEJB_HOME =
D:\tmp\arquillian-apache-tomee\apache-tomee-plus-1.0.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT
SYSTEM_INFO = Java 1.6.0_30
The port should be 10080 by default.
can you check in :
openejb-trunk/arquillian-tomee/arquillian-tomee-remote/src/test/resources/arquillian.xml
- Romain
2012/1/13 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
I am now getting the following, is there a missing or modified default port
configuration
Still the same, something has changed since yesterday morning that is causing
the test tomee to try and bind to port 0 - Trying to figure out what.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4292230.html
Sent from
, and I was then able to hook up a remote debugger to
the server. Stopping in
org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.util.ServiceLoader, it appear
that
the JUnitTestRunning is being picked up from 2 jars - one in the TomEE
temp
directory, and the other straight from the WEB-INF/lib folder
in
org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.util.ServiceLoader, it appear that
the JUnitTestRunning is being picked up from 2 jars - one in the TomEE temp
directory, and the other straight from the WEB-INF/lib folder of the
test.war file being tested.
jar:file:/D:/tmp/arquillian-apache-tomee/apache-tomee-plus-1.0.0-beta-2
.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4288576.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
by the
runtime because it hits the limit.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4288576.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:49 AM, AndyG wrote:
Had a similar fix in the pipes here, was just not quick enough on the
check-in. However, just for info, I have had to bump up a few build
environment options on Windows to get a full build to complete:
set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx768m -XX:MaxPermSize=256M
not enough to recurs through the file system for some of the
assembly items - The issue being a StackOverflow Exception thrown by the
runtime because it hits the limit.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2
Maven OPTS set to (for WIn Sun SDK):
env={'MAVEN_OPTS': '-Xmx1024m -Xss4096k -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=64m
-XX:PermSize=64m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError
-XX:HeapDumpPath=C:\slave4\openejb-trunk-win\dumps'}
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM, David Blevins
I would say most definitely related to the classloading issue. Only one
TestRunner is allowed per classloader.
The
D:/tmp/arquillian-apache-tomee/apache-tomee-plus-1.0.0-beta-2/temp/arquillian-junit-4211441189472437588.jar
is going to be on the application root classloader and all child
/arquillian-apache-tomee/apache-tomee-plus-1.0.0-beta-2/temp/arquillian-junit-4211441189472437588.jar
is going to be on the application root classloader and all child
classloaders will see it, so the
C:/cygwin/tmp/2/test/WEB-INF/lib/arquillian-junit.jar should not be there
and needs to be excluded
I guess you mean the addIfNotExist method?
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4285334.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4285496.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, the URLs need to be normalized and compared more
explicitly against the temp URLs
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4285496.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
methods to check this, but modifying the
'addIfNotExist' method to check for this is a quick fix.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4285702.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
classloader.
I guess this is the same for 'any' temp jar.
I don't know if we have any helper methods to check this, but modifying the
'addIfNotExist' method to check for this is a quick fix.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0
in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4285832.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:45 AM, AndyG wrote:
The whole temp file thing seems to have arisen from JDK inconsistency issues
related to the ClassLoaderUtil.clearSunJarFileFactoryCache method.
This method was for a period failing to actually release the file handle on
jar files due to some real
)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list
that
the JUnitTestRunning is being picked up from 2 jars - one in the TomEE temp
directory, and the other straight from the WEB-INF/lib folder of the
test.war file being tested.
jar:file:/D:/tmp/arquillian-apache-tomee/apache-tomee-plus-1.0.0-beta-2/temp/arquillian-junit-4211441189472437588.jar!/META-INF
-interceptor/README.md:Apache OpenEJB
4.0.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOTbuild: 2003-01:00
./examples/webapps/ejb-examples/pom.xml:
version4.0.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT/version
The tomee-webapp also refers to wrong package
org.apache.openejb.localclient.
Sorry, but I can't give my +1 in regards to those issues
.
./examples/webapps/ejb-examples/pom.xml:
version4.0.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT/version
This one is a problem.
Making mental note that we should add a SNAPSHOT grep to the release tools.
The tomee-webapp also refers to wrong package
org.apache.openejb.localclient.
Darn. Wonder if there's some way we could
On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi David,
Did you by any chance run the legal tool you wrote around the time of the
last release? I remember finding it really useful. I'm happy to give it a
run and post up the results if you give me a couple of pointers.
I'm just
How was this report generated? Can it be generated by everybody?
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:02 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi David,
Did you by any chance run the legal tool you wrote around the time
-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2
$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive
:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2
)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2
)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list
-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4281847.html
in the TomEE temp
directory, and the other straight from the WEB-INF/lib folder of the
test.war file being tested.
jar:file:/D:/tmp/arquillian-apache-tomee/apache-tomee-plus-1.0.0-beta-2/temp/arquillian-junit-4211441189472437588.jar!/META-INF/services/org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.TestRunner
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:59 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run the TCK on these and everything
looks good -- will post link to the tck@ list.
SVN Tag:
+1
On Jan 9, 2012 9:44 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:59 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run the TCK on these and
everything looks good -- will post link to the tck@ list.
Hi David,
Did you by any chance run the legal tool you wrote around the time of the
last release? I remember finding it really useful. I'm happy to give it a
run and post up the results if you give me a couple of pointers.
I'm just checking things over here, hope to post a vote soon.
Cheers
+1
- Romain
2012/1/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
Will have a look on Monday morning.
Have a nice weekend.
Jean-Louis
2012/1/7 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run the TCK on these and
everything looks good -- will post link to
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run the TCK on these and everything
looks good -- will post link to the tck@ list.
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0-beta-2/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-029/
Will have a look on Monday morning.
Have a nice weekend.
Jean-Louis
2012/1/7 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ok, binaries are ready for a vote! Have run the TCK on these and
everything looks good -- will post link to the tck@ list.
SVN Tag:
Hello devs,
Are you guys having problem with the latest build? I cannot get it running.
The “arquillian-tomee-remote” tests fail.
.
.
.
Test set: org.apache.openejb.arquillian.session.SessionScopeTest
---
Tests run: 1
into or used any of the TomEE projects. However, it will be
easy to copy and modify the scripts and exe's to use
'org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap' which is the Tomcat service hook
class.
I'll have a look and see if I can find where to drop the files for
packaging, but if someone knows how to place
I do from time to time...
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We should but does anyone dev under win in the community?
- Romain
Le 28 déc. 2011 08:05, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com a écrit :
I think we should provide bundles of TomEE
I think we should provide bundles of TomEE for win32 and win64. Those
should come pre-bundled with the files allowing to install it as a
service on windows and the native dll's required for the APR
connector.
--
Karan Singh Malhi
twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi
601 - 700 of 840 matches
Mail list logo
