Hello,
My two cents:
woodstox : -1 why adding woodstox, when we have a pull parser included in
Java standard libraries since Java 6 ?
Jackson instead of Jettison : +1 (i also see everyone in my company using
Jackson for r/w JSON)
Alex
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
just to add some word on woodstox: because it is the fastest one
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github:
Is woodstox performance gain visible for what TomEE does with it?
If that for parsing a few web.xml fragments and other configuration files,
then maybe the acceleration isn't visible to make it worth the extra kb in
TomEE distrib
Alex
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:32 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
two questions about next release and dependencies:
1) David reworked our JavaEE descriptors parsing to use sxc. In this
refactoring we
why cxf doesn't use jackson? i don't know...everybody uses it in real life.
Probably because they use jaxb as main API so the bridge to jettison was
quite easy and light.
The issue? just return an attribute with an url http://foo.com; and you'll
get http:\/\/foo.com. This is escaped so low in the
On Jan 13, 2013, at 2:06 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 1:56 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:32 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
Is it portable?
Was accessor module generated (= are the changes we do to it safe?)
Le 13 janv. 2013 23:37, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Jan 13, 2013, at 2:06 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 1:56 PM, David Blevins
