The hudson built in Maven support is tied to Maven 2.x
The hudson built in Maven support also messes with the pom.xml so it
actually is not building the exact same project as a command line build
My recommendation, as a Maven and Hudson developer is to use the freestyle
project type. You will
Hi Stephen,
+1
Fully agree.
I also rapidly switched to Free-style mode in order to get more predictable
builds.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-jira-Closed-INFRA-2998-Setup-Hudson-CI-Build-for-Apache-OpenEJB-tp2548423p2715113.html
Sent from
Hello;
I have found that when ejbs are undeployed, some classes holds web application
classloader and prevents it from GC'ed. I have found that ThreadContext class
uses ThreadLocal that saves BeanContext instance that contains ModuleContext
--
AppContext -- ClassLoader. When bean is
On Sep 26, 2010, at 8:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:18 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I have some slight evidence that setMessageDrivenContext isn't getting
called on an mdb. I think I recall some refactoring around such methods so
they get treated like regular
Hey David,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi guys,
I wondering about the state of OPENEJB-1257
Is it still needed? If yes, will it be committed ? :)
Hi Matthias!
Missed you at
On Sep 27, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hey David,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi guys,
I wondering about the state of OPENEJB-1257
Is it still needed? If yes,
