+1
Jon
Sent from my iPad
On 14 Dec 2012, at 03:40, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Discussion concluded some time ago on changing the name of the project to
Apache TomEE. The consensus is clear to move ahead with the name change and
in the weeks since the discussion, no
+1
Jon
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132
Binaries Source:
I'm sure you're correct. Out of curiosity, when will OWB 1.1.7 be out and what
are the benefits?
Cheers
Jon
Sent from my iPad
On 26 Nov 2012, at 22:16, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
yes
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
necessary that always waiting to
have a perfect release (which never occurs actually).
JLouis
2012/11/26 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
I'm sure you're correct. Out of curiosity, when will OWB 1.1.7 be out and
what are the benefits?
Cheers
Jon
Sent from my iPad
I agree. I don't think we should rename TomEE - its well known and renaming
has the potential to cause confusion.
I do think, however, that changing TomEE to be the top level project, with
OpenEJB as the subproject makes sense.
Jon
On Nov 13, 2012 10:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
+1. I definitely agree with that. TomEE seems to be the main project
project now and identifying it as the top level project makes sense to me.
Jon
On Nov 13, 2012 3:05 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
I don't think any modules need changing as they stand at the moment as the
core code is clearly labelled as openejb, and TomEE specific code sits
within a TomEE module.
I guess the top level svn URL may change, but that should only need an 'svn
switch' if that's the case.
I think renaming the
Hi Mark,
That's nice! Thanks for the tip!
Jon
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
A quick note about getting tomee a bit faster in big real world scenarios.
Tomcat 7.0.23 introduced a parallel start feature.
Please change to the following in
Nice! Good idea putting links to the other announcements in, I hadn't
spotted the JRebel TomEE support, so I'll be giving that a go as well
grabbing the latest Intellij EAP.
Jon
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:56 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Noticed the Intellij Blog post on TomEE
+1
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-060
Binaries Source:
Hi guys,
I'm hoping I will be able to join you, but unfortunately I won't be able to
come to the conference as I won't be able to get the time off work. I'm hoping
to come out for one of the weekends, most likely the one after the conference
(Munich?). Has anyone picked a hotel for Munich?
+1
Sent from my iPad
On 30 May 2012, at 23:52, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
to prepare next release i think we need to release javaee-api.
Changes since last vote:
TOMEE-201 JAXB ContextFinder is not available in correct version
TOMEE-202 UriBuilder badly
That's all committed. Many thanks for the patch Andy!
Cheers
Jon
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:55 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On May 25, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi,
I recommended TomEE to my friend Andy who has been taking a look at
using it where
property
Le 26 mai 2012 00:25, Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
a
écrit :
That's all committed. Many thanks for the patch Andy!
Cheers
Jon
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:55 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 25, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Jonathan
There isn't a TomEE Eclipse plugin, but there is an OpenEJB one, which
includes a WTP server for OpenEJB, and a wizard to migrate from EJB2.1 to
EJB3, generating the relevant annotations. I'm no expert but I do have some
experience of doing Eclipse plugins, and did a fair amount of work on the
+1
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:28 AM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
Changes since last vote:
- r1330642 | dblevins | Wed Apr 25 20:51:21 PDT 2012 | 22
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1330642
TOMEE-127: Remote Arquillian Adapter for TomEE (related fixes
I think for the most part, I am happy with the jar file changes since beta
2. Currently, my vote is -1, really down to the license / notice files
already mentioned. I'll do some work on these tomorrow.
Jon
On Friday, April 20, 2012, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Jonathan
I'm running a full build from the tag with all the tests and a clean .m2
directory at the moment. I'm sure it'll be fine, but I always like to try a
build when voting :). Meanwhile, I've been taking a look at the legal
report. I'll do a bit more on this tomorrow, but I spotted a couple of
things
As well as location, does anyone have any thoughts on dates - I think
Sept/Oct was mentioned earlier in the thread? The sooner we decide when I
can get some holiday booked from work :) Location wise I'm happy to travel
anywhere in Europe, I'm also happy to go out to LA as well, although I'd
+1 for a new release. Let me know if I can help with anything on the UI.
Jon
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.orgwrote:
Yeap.
I will try it tonight. Not exactly what I wanted, but I can live with that.
:O) I will definitively need more time for the new
+1
Jon
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
All checked with Romain.
Did not notice something wrong either in binaries or in sources.
BTW, we saw a bug in JAX-RS integration. This is not a blocking reason IMO.
If i'm wrong, lemme know.
We
Going to take a look on my Windows machine here - I'll shout if I can see
what the problem is.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:45 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Darn.
I might be able to dig in on Saturday or Sunday, but not likely sooner.
If anyone out there who has the
to the problem, but would
switching to the webapp folder based deployer be better?
Jon
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Going to take a look on my Windows machine here - I'll shout if I can see
what the problem is.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 10
Hi David,
Did you by any chance run the legal tool you wrote around the time of the
last release? I remember finding it really useful. I'm happy to give it a
run and post up the results if you give me a couple of pointers.
I'm just checking things over here, hope to post a vote soon.
Cheers
+1
Jon
--Original Message--
From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
ReplyTo: dev@openejb.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Vishwanath Krishnamurthi as committer
Sent: 30 Nov 2011 10:35
All is in the subject :)
Vishwa has been very active to enhance our documentation and to create
Thought I'd chip in my thoughts on this.
Personally, I haven't encountered issues running Git on Windows lately, but
I remember it being awful when I first looked at it a few years back. I
agree with Romain's point though, it would be a shame for someone not to
contribute to the project because
Just a heads-up - I've expanded this and made sure it can deploy/undeploy
.wars, .jars and .ears. I've also moved it to its own module, which we can
add to TomEE as part of the TCK run. I'm going to try using it to run some
TCK tests locally and see how it gets on.
Jon
-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
ok but the webappdeployer is not linked to the deployment at all, just to
the way we deploy tcks so should we keep this ejb on trunk?
- Romain
2011/11/7 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Nov 6, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
My
Hi
I've just committed a Tomcat webapp folder style implementation of
Deployer. I've only tried it with .war files so far, going to try with .ear
and .jars tomorrow. For the .ear/.jar case is it sensible to invoke the
usual DeployerEjb class in that case, or would it be better to take the
same
is the goal? If i
understand it hopes tomcat already deployed the webapp, no?
- Romain
Le 7 nov. 2011 00:47, Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
a
écrit :
Hi
I've just committed a Tomcat webapp folder style implementation of
Deployer. I've only tried it with .war files so far
Yep.
Beta 1 release (webprofile certified!)
JAX London presentation from Tuesday + more upcoming presentations
New features: JAX-RS support, Arquillian, I'm sure there's some more.
I'm happy to add to these and any others. How do we edit this now - looks
like its in SVN (or is that just for
+1. I think it looks great.
On Nov 2, 2011 9:27 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1 I think we should simply give it a go and adapt over time where
necessary.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:06 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 26, 2011, at 11:38 PM, David
You beat me to it... I was about to commit something similar to cleanup
these files. :)
Thanks!
Jon
On Oct 29, 2011 11:38 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Sat Oct 29 22:38:23 2011
New Revision: 1195062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1195062view=rev
Log:
(new InitialContext()) (in the container)
- Romain
2011/10/27 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Weird, it seems to work in embedded case.
Le 27 oct. 2011 13:29, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
a écrit :
When I first saw your email, I did wonder whether
.
- Romain
2011/10/28 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
Neither the arquillian-showcase-ejb example, nor my own test in the
moviefun
example for testing ejbs work with the embedded adapter as it stands
either
- the ejb isn't getting injected.
I'd be grateful
really would like to avoid to contribute our own enricher if it is
not something directly linked to openejb
- Romain
2011/10/28 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
@RunAsClient
Hehe.. I'll go for the surprise :) - I'll give it a go as soon as I can.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
i just tried a kind of joke (sorry ;)) and i was asking if you wanted
suspense or not
- Romain
2011/10/28 Jonathan Gallimore
Hmm. I'll check that again... something wasn't working right for me.
On Oct 27, 2011 5:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why beanmanager stuff is not enough?
- Romain
-- Message transféré --
De : jgallim...@apache.org
Date : 27 oct. 2011 01:08
When I first saw your email, I did wonder whether the bean manager code
would be enough, and maybe I was just missing the ArchiveAppender stuff to
get the Enricher over to the server side. I've retested with the EJB lookup
commented out, and unfortunately, It didn't work without my change for the
Are you using Maven 3? I think I had to use Maven 2 when I tried.
Jon
On Oct 27, 2011 7:09 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Building, I ran into a couple of test failures. IIRC, that wasn't too
uncommon for building 3.0.x on Mac OS.
Running without tests, I'm seeing:
[ERROR]
+1
On Oct 16, 2011 11:34 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
about our arquillian adapters,
do we drop arquillian-tomee-embedded-with-war ? (+1 for me ;))
- Romain
2011/10/5 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
Will do (will be tomorrow now, its getting late
is currently
commented out of the build. I could take a look at that.
Jon
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
not so far (we are in alpha 5 and showcase uses CR1) but it needs some
modifications
- Romain
2011/10/12 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim
I've done that - thanks for the tip!
Jon
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Just take care to be up to date on both openejb trunk and arquillian
adapters otherwise tests will fail.
- Romain
Le 15 oct. 2011 15:49, Jonathan Gallimore
Sorry, committing that was a mistake. I'll change it back. For info, I did
that because the schema on oracle's site was unavailable. The effect was
that TomEE would take 70 seconds to deploy this app, and it would then fail
as soon as any persistence method was called. I havent dug too deep, but
Reverted in revision 1183085.
Jon
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, committing that was a mistake. I'll change it back. For info, I did
that because the schema on oracle's site was unavailable. The effect was
that TomEE would take
:(
- Romain
2011/10/13 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
Sorry, committing that was a mistake. I'll change it back. For info, I
did
that because the schema on oracle's site was unavailable. The effect was
that TomEE would take 70 seconds to deploy this app, and it would then
fail
I'm happy to have a go at getting some of these working. I've done a bit of
work on our Arquillian adapters so I'm happy to try and help out anyone else
who wants to have a look as well.
I've also got our moviefun sample working with both adapters, and got it
running a test with Selenium. This is
Sweet. Are we far behind version-wise?
Jon
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
i'm upgrading arquillian-tomee-embedded (and common) versions
- Romain
2011/10/12 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
I'm happy to have a go at getting
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a heads-up - I don't know if anyone else has seen this, but I've
noticed some odd behaviour with TomEE. When it finishes
Absolutely fantastic!! Well done and big thanks to everyone, this is an
amazing achievement!
And I just also wanted to echo what others have said here - a big thank you
to you David, for the direction, guidance, help and ideas you've given us
and all the work you put in!
I'm looking forward to
Hi there,
We have an Eclipse plugin that has this feature. The update site is at:
http://apache.org/dist/openejb/eclipse-plugin/update-site/ - it would great
to know how you get on with it. I think there's an issue with Eclipse 3.7,
but previous versions work ok.
There's also a blog entry here
You beat me to it - I had just noticed they were missing! Will this pick up
the css and images as well?
Jon
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:44 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Tue Oct 4 09:44:10 2011
New Revision: 1178742
URL:
Thanks, I'll grab that and try it out when that goes in.
Cheers
Jon
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
no, i've just saw it, the next commit will bring back css, html and images
too
- Romain
2011/10/4 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM, David Blevins
david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
When I hacked up the Remote with zip adapter I intended
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: Arquillian adapters
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29
+1
Jon
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:28 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
NOTE TO EVERYONE
I know re-rolling can be very time consuming and often
people vote on the first release attempt and never vote
again. We want a strong turnout for this vote and it
would be a shame to
+1
Jon
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:52 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:17 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, the new binaries are up!
Changes since last vote:
- switched version number of TomEE to 1.0.0-beta-1
Are you able to access the html file on people.apache.org at the moment?
Looks like I can't get a http connection to that machine either from home or
work at the moment. I'm really keen to check to check that out.
Thanks for rolling this, I'm going to try and get a bit of time to look at
it in
, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you able to access the html file on people.apache.org at the moment?
Looks like I can't get a http connection to that machine either from home
or
work at the moment. I'm really keen to check to check that out.
Thanks for rolling
I definitely agree. Sounds great.
Jon
On Sep 30, 2011 8:01 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Was chatting with Romain and he mentioned some fixes he wanted to add that
didn't make this release. I imagine that there'll be plenty of fixes that
will happen over the next couple weeks.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
When I hacked up the Remote with zip adapter I intended to
merge it into the remote adapter - along the lines of: check to see if
TomEE
is running
I agree.
Jon
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 to put them in sandbox
- Romain
2011/9/25 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
- LICENSE/NOTICE files (likely out of date)
On
i think you might need to add -Dassemble to to mvn release:prepare
command if you don't have it already.
Jon
On 9/23/11, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but all these things should be done by release plugin, that makes me
feel confusion
2011/9/23 Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org
I've just had a quick look at this. I can't get a checkout of the source
code to build, because some of the POMs are still referencing the version as
3.0.4-SNAPSHOT. A quick grep is showing the following pom.xml files with
references to 3.0.4-SNAPSHOT.
assembly/openejb-tomcat/pom.xml
+1
Just one thing I spotted, the LICENSE/NOTICE files in the *-sources jars
that I built from the tag didn't match up with the ones in the repository.
The jars in the repository all look ok to me though, and the binaries I
built from the tag match up ok.
Jon
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:21 PM,
/27 Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
I think it would be great to get some kind of alpha/beta/milestone
release
out.
We deliberately keep the examples on a different version number to
openejb,
as there shouldn't be any dependency there, but we create an examples zip
at
release
to 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT after that.
What's the view here - should we go for 3.1 and change/comment out the test
until a newer connector is published, or is it preferably to try and get a
newer version of the connector published.
Jon
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim
. But is
connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be great to get some kind of alpha/beta/milestone
release
out.
We deliberately keep the examples on a different version number to
openejb,
as there shouldn't
I think it would be great to get some kind of alpha/beta/milestone release
out.
We deliberately keep the examples on a different version number to openejb,
as there shouldn't be any dependency there, but we create an examples zip at
release time as well as everything else I believe.
I'm not too
I agree with the proposals in this thread. It would be great to see more
work on the Jetty integration, but as there's a lot of work going on with
TomEE so I have no problem with it going to the sandbox. I'm not sure where
the spring module is at, but I think people are using it, so maybe that
Hi all,
Just to let you know I committed some more Arquillian support into the
sandbox area. There's now three modes of operation:
1. Remote (you have to have TomEE running)
2. Fully embedded (no need for a war file or anything like that)
3. Slightly less embeddded - this uses
/updatePolicy
/snapshots
/pluginRepository
/pluginRepositories
/profile
We should probably include this in the pom.xml for the adaptor.
Jon
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just to let you know I committed some more Arquillian support
We've got a build failure on buildbot:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-trunk-deploy/builds/46/steps/deploy/logs/stdio
My guess is something is up with the changes to the javaee-api embedded
stuff - the error is a missing artifact:
org.apache.openejb:javaee-api:jar:embedded:6.0-SNAPSHOT.
From: Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Arquillian
David just pointed out to me on IRC that you'll need some artifacts from
the
JBoss repository. Here's the relevant profile
Hi Romain,
It works on my machine with a clean m2 repo. I guess there's some issue
with buildbot. Anyone know if that's on maven 2 or 3?
Jon
On Aug 19, 2011 10:23 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Try with m3 Jon
Le 19 août 2011 22:21, Jonathan Gallimore jonathan.gallim
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Mentioned this on IRC, but here is where our CDI failures started. Tracked
this down via cycling through OWB and OpenEJB commits one at a time. So if
it was an OWB commit that cause the failure it would have shown
I agree. Using hibernate seems to be a popular configuration so I think a
Maven profile, or even something that could download hibernate and include
it in TomEE (link in the OpenEJB web dashboard?) or some other means of
making it easier to use these JPA providers would be great.
Jon
On Fri, Jul
I don't know much about CloudFoundry, but I'd love to see this working. If
you're interested in working on it that would be great, I don't have a lot
of experience with this sort of thing, but I'd be keen to help out if I can.
Jon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Bakalsky, Krum
I wasn't going to admit to it, but so did I. I just happened to be messing
around with my phone when Mohammed's 30 minutes to go e-mail arrived!
Looking forward to seeing you guys on the next hangout!
Jon
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Marius Kruger ama...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 July 2011
I'm on his profile, but there's no hangout button :S
I'll keep trying.
Jon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
jump onto plus.google.com and click on the hangout button on Mohammad's
profile
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
I'm pretty flexible, time-wise. I won't be able to join during
working
hours
9-5.30 GMT but can do any evening and most weekends. The hangout
looks
like
its at 11pm for me - 3 hours before that as Jacek suggested is
also
fine
for
me
I'm pretty flexible, time-wise. I won't be able to join during working hours
9-5.30 GMT but can do any evening and most weekends. The hangout looks like
its at 11pm for me - 3 hours before that as Jacek suggested is also fine for
me.
Jon
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:45 PM, David Blevins
I agree - it makes sense to strip these apps out. Would be great to
separately distribute the ejb-examples app and perhaps the moviefun app as
WAR files as well.
Jon
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
lol, i thought it this morning, +1 to remove
Seem to be caching proxies in JNDI
--
Key: OPENEJB-1618
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1618
Project: OpenEJB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: container system
Reporter: Jonathan Gallimore
Assignee: Jonathan Gallimore
Priority: Minor
response. Just reverted it with #1142169
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
No problem, go ahead and revert it and I'll take another look at it.
Sorry
if its caused any hassle. I'll see if I can run the relevant geronimo
tests
when I
, please check
that when you have a chance to run geornimo tck against your changes.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Shawn. I would be good to get the IvmContext change back in but
leave
the LocalBeanProxyGenerator change out. I'll
Hi Vishwa
Thanks for checking out the adaptor, it would be great to take it further.
Hopefully I'll be able to do some more work on it myself next week. We can
definitely add the JBoss repo to the POM (I think I have it in my
settings.xml).
In terms of the dependencies, I've tried to keep them
No problem. I've been able to reproduce it - just using the security policy
you provided with our simple-stateless example was enough. I don't have a
fix yet, but I'll post back when I've debugged it a bit further.
Cheers
Jon
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:16 AM, mclu m...@markuslutum.de wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for posting. I'm not sure what's going on here. Sounds like a general
issue rather than anything specific to the Tomcat integration.
I'll give your sample a try this afternoon and let you know what I find.
Jon
On 15 Jun 2011 15:04, mclu m...@markuslutum.de wrote:
I have already
Hi All,
I've been working on providing support for connector 1.6 modules. I've just
committed a patch which moves us onto the latest geronimo connector, and
also scrapes the new connector annotations and merges them into the JAXB
tree. Most of the changes are in AnnotationDeployer, with a few
Hi Hao, Alper and Ranga! Welcome!
That all sounds good to me. Longer term I think it would be good to start
work on a Jetty equivalent of TomEE as well.
I'd definitely love to see some more work on the Arquillian side of things,
I think it would be a great way to get involved with the project. I
, May 27, 2011 at 7:32 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On May 21, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
I hacked up a quick Arquillian adaptor for TomEE which I'm using for a
project at work. Its a bit raw, but I've checked it into the sandbox
area.
If you fancy
Hi Aldrin,
I wrote a couple of Maven Archetypes a while back - one is for a simple
ejb-jar and the other is a multi module ear project, with OpenEJB mixed in
to do testing. They were based on some generic J2EE archetypes that were
around at the time - not sure if they still are or not.
I also
+1
Jon
+1
Jon
you. I just noticed there were already some archetypes.
After that, I noticed the sandboxes also had some OpenEJB Mojos. Any
opinions about it as well?
Thank you
--
-- Aldrin Leal, ald...@leal.eng.br / http://www.leal.eng.br/mnemetica/
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
are really great. They're also a great place to start contributing
to the project :)
Jon
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Do you really use ma en archetypes? Personaly examples are more useful.
- Romain
Le 23 mai 2011 10:26, Jonathan Gallimore
Hi,
I just committed a small change to allow module IDs to be set from a system
property, which has been useful to ensure a JNDI env entry was mapped to the
right connector module.
You can add a property like this:
connector-filename.rar.moduleId=moduleId
I don't think it'll cause any
Hi all,
I hacked up a quick Arquillian adaptor for TomEE which I'm using for a
project at work. Its a bit raw, but I've checked it into the sandbox area.
If you fancy checking it out, any feedback would be welcome!
Cheers
Jon
Hi,
Just wanted to give a heads-up - I spotted that java:comp/UserTransaction
wasn't being setup correctly in our Tomcat integration for Tomcat 7, so
looking it up from a servlet wasn't working. I've committed a simple fix.
Please shout if it gives any problems!
Jon
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
