it compiles under java5 using this patch:
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] OpenEJB ...
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
jean-louis.monte...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Hum, gave it a try and all seems to pass.
I won't pull my hair out ;-)
Here is my +1.
Apologize for the delay.
No worries, the help is appreciated.
I found a solution for getting JDK 1.5 back on
Hi,
is somebody else facing a SAAJ problem with webservice-attachments example?
Since last week, i've been also facing stange issues with Maven/OpenEJB and
some dependencies like Woden, Netthi, Jaxen.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
jean-louis.monte...@atosorigin.com wrote:
is somebody else facing a SAAJ problem with webservice-attachments example?
Since last week, i've been also facing stange issues with Maven/OpenEJB and
some dependencies like Woden, Netthi, Jaxen.
I
It should be related to Java 5 versus Java 6.
Java 6 -- OK
Java 5 -- KO
So, one dependency should be missed.
Gonna checkout again a 3.1.3 and give it a try.
Can remember if I used a JDK 6 for the last vote.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
Hum, having some troubles with maven ...
[WARNING] The POM for org.apache.neethi:neethi:jar:2.0 is missing, no
dependency information available
[WARNING] The POM for jaxen:jaxen:jar:1.1-beta-10 is missing, no dependency
information available
...
[INFO]
It's a bit better using maven 2 but the build still fails.
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] There are test failures.
Please refer to
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you considered using animal snif...@mojo to check you only use java 1.5
methods and classes
Hadn't even heard of it. If you want to send a patch, that'd be excellent.
-David
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Oooo-kaaay. Thanks everyone so much for the patience. Here we have
another set of binaries that can actually compile and run in Java 5 :)
Third time's the charm!
Release notes:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Oooo-kaaay. Thanks everyone so much for the patience. Here we have
another set of binaries that can actually compile and run in Java 5 :)
+1
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE -
Andy,
+1
Win XP/7 32 and 64bit.
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 18:26.468s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Nov 12 09:22:20 CET 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 442M/989M
[INFO]
+1
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Andy andy.gumbre...@orprovision.comwrote:
Andy,
+1
Win XP/7 32 and 64bit.
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 18:26.468s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Nov 12 09:22:20 CET
+1
2010/11/12 Karan Malhi karan.ma...@gmail.com
+1
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Andy andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
wrote:
Andy,
+1
Win XP/7 32 and 64bit.
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO]
+1
env:
Apache Maven 2.2.1 (rdebian-4)
Java version: 1.6.0_22
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.22/jre
Default locale: en_CA, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: linux version: 2.6.35-22-generic arch: amd64 Family: unix
Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 15:16:01-0400)
Java version:
Geez, having some very bad release-luck. Got his question on IRC:
rniamo hi, is openejb 3.1.4 java 5 compliant? i think it uses
Property.stringPropertyNames() method which is only java 1.6 compliant
Of course OSX yanked Java 1.5, so I booted up a Parallels VM and ran
the build with WinXP and
Oooo-kaaay. Thanks everyone so much for the patience. Here we have
another set of binaries that can actually compile and run in Java 5 :)
Third time's the charm!
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/3.1.4/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Repo:
+1 TCK 100% passed wiith geronimo 2.2. branch.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Oooo-kaaay. Thanks everyone so much for the patience. Here we have
another set of binaries that can actually compile and run in Java 5 :)
Third time's the charm!
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:42 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
I am seeing this, when shutting down tomtom
SEVERE: The web application [/ejb-examples] appears to have started a
thread named
Should have cancelled this sooner, but this one pretty much tanked the release:
* [OPENEJB-1394] Stateless pool leak on failed post construct
As well this one turned out to still be an issue on windows:
* [OPENEJB-1371] Double encoding of persistence-unit root-url leads
to issues in paths
Ok. This one should be golden. Anymore issues pop up and we'll have to push
them out to the next release.
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote2/3.1.4/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-065/
Binaries:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
One minor note, copyright in the NOTICE file is not current:
Copyright 1999-2009 The Apache OpenEJB development community
Nothing major... Will update in current dev branch...
Here's my +1 and a comment on Kevan's
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
I am seeing this, when shutting down tomtom
SEVERE: The web application [/ejb-examples] appears to have started a
thread named [poolevict...@17704464] but has failed to stop it. This
is very likely to create a
I am seeing this, when shutting down tomtom
SEVERE: The web application [/ejb-examples] appears to have started a
thread named [poolevict...@17704464] but has failed to stop it. This
is very likely to create a memory leak.
Nov 4, 2010 8:25:34 PM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader
All EJB related tck cases passed with geronimo 22 branch.
+1
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Jon
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:03 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
Ok. This one should be pretty quick -- not too many
+1
Le 2 nov. 2010 01:32, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com a écrit :
+1
2010/11/2 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
+1
PS: If you want me to I could run the test on the various platforms as
I did last time.
...
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote1/
Ok. This one should be pretty quick -- not too many changes.
Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-005/
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote1/
Branch (to become a tag):
+1
Jeff
On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:03 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok. This one should be pretty quick -- not too many changes.
Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-005/
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote1/
Branch (to
+1
PS: If you want me to I could run the test on the various platforms as
I did last time.
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:03 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Ok. This one should be pretty quick -- not too many changes.
Repo:
+1
2010/11/2 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com
+1
PS: If you want me to I could run the test on the various platforms as
I did last time.
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:03 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
wrote:
Ok. This one should be pretty quick -- not too many
29 matches
Mail list logo
