[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-244:
-
Attachment: (was: J2DoPrivHelper.java)
> Java 2 Security enablement
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509227
]
Craig Russell commented on OPENJPA-244:
---
Very nice piece of work, Albert.
The original patch should be remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509220
]
Craig Russell commented on OPENJPA-244:
---
I'm reviewing it right now. Will be done in an hour.
> Java 2 Securi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509218
]
Marc Prud'hommeaux commented on OPENJPA-239:
I like it. Anyone have any issues with committing this patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509204
]
Marc Prud'hommeaux commented on OPENJPA-244:
After quick review, the patch looks good to me. Anyone else
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509188
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-272:
--
New information...
My original posting wasn't quite accurate. You nee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509181
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-272:
--
The result of this type of scenario is that you get duplicate key excep
@GenerateValue (AUTO) doesn't work with Property level access
-
Key: OPENJPA-272
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-272
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Albert Lee updated OPENJPA-244:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-244.patch
Based on the previous design/implementation discussions. attached is a
DB2 missing JDBC driver 2 support
-
Key: OPENJPA-271
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-271
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jdbc
Affects Versions: 1.0.0
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dick closed OPENJPA-270.
> Delete Query transformed into a Select Query
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dick resolved OPENJPA-270.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Looks like this issue is resolved and is working for Frederic. Please reop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dick updated OPENJPA-266:
-
Attachment: OPENJPA-266.patch.txt
Attaching updated patch. I committed the changes to PreparedSt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dick updated OPENJPA-266:
-
Attachment: (was: openjpa-jdbc.patch)
> Add Extensibility: Change "private" field/method to
Sounds reasonable to me.
On 6/29/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It is possible to registering a LifecycleListener like so:
emf.addLifecycleListener(new MyLifecycleListener());
However, a listener so registered will never fire, because the
internal code will see a Clas
Hi,
It is possible to registering a LifecycleListener like so:
emf.addLifecycleListener(new MyLifecycleListener());
However, a listener so registered will never fire, because the
internal code will see a Class[0], not null, as the last argument to
addLifecycleListener(). The right syntax is:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509028
]
Frederic Jeanneau commented on OPENJPA-270:
---
Thanks for your answer.
In fact, I have a matching row in the
17 matches
Mail list logo