Hi Kevin,
On Jul 30, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
I haven't found all of the details on the problem report that made
this
change, but the abstract indicates "hashmap performance changes".
So, our
findings would be consistent with that.
I just wanted to see if anybody thought that
Kevin-
If the current testcase works with the Sun JDK, why am I
getting different results just because I changed the equality
checks for the
IBM JDK?
I don't know the answer to that, but is it possible there is also
some other difference in the IBM JDK aside from the HashMap/Integer
equ
Hi Kevin,
The DFA result is dependent on the order of the nodes in Graph._nodes.
If the first node visited is 2, then the result is as the Sun jdk
returns it, if the first node visited is 5, you'll get your results.
Maybe changing Graph._nodes from HashMap to TreeMap would give us a
consistent
Markus,
Thanks for the patch, but I don't need that. I already have the coding
changes done. I'm just trying to figure out how this graphing is supposed
to work. I figured I wanted to get the current testcase to work with the
IBM JDK before making any other changes. If the testcase works with t
I've attached two patches to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
OPENJPA-285. I've tested deploy/undeploy scenarios with the two
patches. They appear to clear up ClassLoader memory leaks associated
with deployment/undeployment of applications.
The patch to ImplHelper is straight-forward
Definitely. Just add your name to the attendee list.
-Patrick
On 7/30/07, Aditi Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is the Face-To-Face meeting open for all to attend? I see a attendee list in
> the below link.
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/openjpa/OpenJPA+Up+Close+and+Perso
Hi,
Is the Face-To-Face meeting open for all to attend? I see a attendee list in
the below link.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/openjpa/OpenJPA+Up+Close+and+Personal
Is anybody else allowed to attend other than that ?
-Aditi
From: Teresa K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Albert Lee updated OPENJPA-303:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-303.patch
The solution is to add the new'ed cols List in
AnnotationPersistenceM
MappingTools not honoring @Temporal for Date & Calender entity attributes
-
Key: OPENJPA-303
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-303
Project: OpenJPA
Issu
Maybe it just my mail client that's only showing my updated patch to
address the test failure. This is my original comment to Kevin's email:
Hi Kevin, all,
I have found several places in DepthFirstAnalysis, Graph, Edge, and the
testcase that was using the wrong equality check. The testcase is
PCEnhancer needs target classes on classpath!
-
Key: OPENJPA-302
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-302
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: docs
Affec
Index:
openjpa-lib/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/lib/graph/TestDepthFirstAnalysis.java
===
---
openjpa-lib/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/lib/graph/TestDepthFirstAnalysis.java
(revision 561053)
+++
openjpa-lib/src/test/java/o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Catalina Wei updated OPENJPA-240:
-
Attachment: OPENJPA-240.r560665.patch
Attached patch has JAXB XML annotation parser refactored o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Catalina Wei updated OPENJPA-240:
-
Attachment: (was: openjpa-240.xmlmapping.patch)
> Persistent field mappings to database supp
I have found several places in DepthFirstAnalysis, Graph, Edge, and the
testcase that was using the wrong equality check. The testcase is working
much better, but still not perfect.
I need some graphing expertise... In the setup for graph 2 in the testcase,
there is a node that has an edge to it
Craig, Marc, and Patrick,
You guys work too late on a Sunday night... :-) Thanks for the input.
I haven't found all of the details on the problem report that made this
change, but the abstract indicates "hashmap performance changes". So, our
findings would be consistent with that.
I just wante
Thanks, David.
I was not pointing to the right repository.
Following works (slightly different than the instructions at
http://openjpa.apache.org/obtaining.html
apache-snapshots
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
org.apache
That looks to me like what works in geronimo, except for ...scope>
In my experience sometimes maven gets confused and stops trying to
download stuff if there's something wrong with one of the xml
metadata files. i would try first mvn -U and if that doesn't work
rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/a
Found the requisite info at the site:
http://openjpa.apache.org/obtaining.html
Pinaki Poddar
972.834.2865
-Original Message-
From: Pinaki Poddar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:26 AM
To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: How does to OpenJPA be declared in pom.xml
Hi,
How does to OpenJPA be declared in other pom.xml?
I have following declared in a pom.xml.
org.apache.openjpa
openjpa
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
compile
On a fresh Maven repository, 'mvn package' complaints the following:
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
Missing:
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
