[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12650422#action_12650422
]
David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-779:
--
I'm not very involved in openjpa but...
I us
openjpa-lib/pom.xml has extraneous code
---
Key: OPENJPA-783
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-783
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Fernando
in the pom.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12650401#action_12650401
]
Fernando commented on OPENJPA-779:
--
So.. as a group we can't decide to just pick one proj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fernando updated OPENJPA-781:
-
Attachment: pom.xml.diff
this is actually a bigger diff of cleaning up the scopes of more pom files..
s
Support for collections of embeddables and basic types
--
Key: OPENJPA-782
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-782
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Question
Reporter:
openjpa-jdbc depends on postgres driver, should be "provided"
-
Key: OPENJPA-781
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-781
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12650305#action_12650305
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-758:
--
Hi,
Just to ensure that I have discovered the
Hi,
A question has surfaced about the use of ValueHandlers vs FieldStrategies.
According to the OpenJPA documentation [1], a user should be able to specify
either a custom ValueHandler implementation or FieldStrategy implementation
via the @Strategy annotation. This does not seem to be the case.