[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-793) Embeddables does not work properly with duplicate persistent field names

2008-11-27 Thread Fay Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fay Wang updated OPENJPA-793: - Attachment: openjpa-793-testcase.patch > Embeddables does not work properly with duplicate persistent fi

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-793) Embeddables does not work properly with duplicate persistent field names

2008-11-27 Thread Fay Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fay Wang updated OPENJPA-793: - Attachment: openjpa-793-3.patch The logic to detect duplicate names in the embeddable is moved from Emb

[jira] Resolved: (OPENJPA-742) Add line number and column number to QueryMetaData

2008-11-27 Thread Fay Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fay Wang resolved OPENJPA-742. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > Add line number and column number to QueryMetaData > -

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-742) Add line number and column number to QueryMetaData

2008-11-27 Thread Fay Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651408#action_12651408 ] Fay Wang commented on OPENJPA-742: -- Patch is committed to openjpa 1.2.x r719275, 1.3.x r7

[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-795) enhancer throws an exception when parsing column name "first.name" because it thinks 'first' is a table name

2008-11-27 Thread Jianfeng Mao (JIRA)
enhancer throws an exception when parsing column name "first.name" because it thinks 'first' is a table name Key: OPENJPA-795 URL: https://issues.apache.o

Re: [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-773) Upgrade to JPA 2

2008-11-27 Thread Kevin Sutter
Jeremy, Re: incompatible method signatures... I agree. We definitely do need to address this. Since the spec overrides our implementation, we might just have a migration issue for our customers. Hopefully, this hasn't been used extensively. Maybe we should open a sub-task JIRA issue to keep t