Hi Craig,
I think it depends on how official we want to make the milestone releases. I
was thinking of the milestones being "smaller" convenience releases, not
"official" releases that get published to maven central. When we cut a
milestone release we'd leave it in the SNAPSHOT repository so that
Hi David,
You're correct on both counts. You'll only be affected if you do not run the
PCEnhancer, or use a javaagent.
My Votes :
+1 Turn off subclass enhancement in trunk
+1 Turn off subclass enhancement in 1.3.x
In for a penny in for a pound. . .
I think the subclass support a noble goal but
Just to be really clear, this won't affect either:
- projects that have pre-enhanced their classes at build time using
e.g. a maven plugin or ant task
- app servers (for instance) that start up with an appropriate
javaagent that hooks up to the openjpa enhancer
it will only affect people wh
Hi,
This is a tough decision, but one that I think we need to make. If you have
been following the dev mailing list, there have been several discussions [1]
and JIRA Issues [2] about the fallback enhancement by subclassing that we
put in place back in the 1.0.0 timeframe. Although we succeeded in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fay Wang resolved OPENJPA-815.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Exception is thrown when retrieving an entity which contains an embeddable
> and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12653554#action_12653554
]
Fay Wang commented on OPENJPA-815:
--
patch is committed to openjpa 1.3.0 r-73477, and trun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12653550#action_12653550
]
Fernando commented on OPENJPA-801:
--
I am still at a loss, any help would be appreciated;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fay Wang updated OPENJPA-815:
-
Attachment: openjpa-815.patch
> Exception is thrown when retrieving an entity which contains an embeddab
Hi Jeremy,
I don't understand why the version needs to be changed from simply
2.0.0-SNAPSHOT to 2.0.0-Mx-SNAPSHOT. Seems like we would be making
trouble for folks who want to use the release. Wouldn't we want to
make the change at the time we want to release, e.g. from 2.0.0-
SNAPSHOT to 2
Exception is thrown when retrieving an entity which contains an embeddable and
the embeddable contains a toMany relation
-
Key: OPENJPA-815
UR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sandhya updated OPENJPA-792:
Attachment: openjpa-792.patch
Hi All,
Please find the attached patch that has a small modification
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12653367#action_12653367
]
Albert Lee commented on OPENJPA-433:
I don't think the configuration framework be smar
Three in favor, no oppose. Motion passes. :-)
The build artifacts for each milestone will be named
openjpa*-2.0.0-Mx-SNAPSHOT.jar, where x is the milestone number. I'll
commit the pom updates for M1 shortly.
-Jeremy
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12653331#action_12653331
]
Michal Borowiecki commented on OPENJPA-433:
---
works but
results in exception
14 matches
Mail list logo
