Hi,
Can someone explain this deep interest to 'runtime enhancement'? In
production, no one in sane mind will attempt it. In development, what is the
real reason of bypassing build-time enhancement? An extra build step? Or is
it that there is a 'cool factor' in redefining a class on the fly?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678483#action_12678483
]
Rick Curtis commented on OPENJPA-952:
-
Yes I think it would be possible to move the lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678459#action_12678459
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-952:
--
This sounds very promising! Thanks for divin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678445#action_12678445
]
Michael Dick commented on OPENJPA-951:
--
Hi David, I haven't tried the remote-resource
Utilize Sun JDK's Attach API to dynamically load the OpenJPA enhancer agent
---
Key: OPENJPA-952
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-952
Project: OpenJPA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678369#action_12678369
]
David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-951:
--
In my experience using the maven-remote-resou
Javadoc jar file does not contain legal files
-
Key: OPENJPA-951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-951
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: build / infrastructure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dick reassigned OPENJPA-951:
Assignee: Michael Dick
> Javadoc jar file does not contain legal files
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
B.J. Reed updated OPENJPA-247:
--
Attachment: OPENJPA-247.patch
Patch contains a new test case for
org.apache.openjpa.persistence.simpl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
B.J. Reed updated OPENJPA-922:
--
Attachment: (was: OPENJPA-922-B.patch)
> setByteArrayInputStream being used in stead of setBytes
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
B.J. Reed updated OPENJPA-922:
--
Attachment: OPENJPA-922-C.patch
Thanks Milosz. I was so worried about the fix not breaking other DBs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated OPENJPA-896:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.4)
> Several source files include Windows EoL chars
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678315#action_12678315
]
Donald Woods commented on OPENJPA-949:
--
Agree that allowing an override from a proper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678297#action_12678297
]
Marc Logemann commented on OPENJPA-72:
--
still think that this is an annoying bug.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678274#action_12678274
]
Milosz Tylenda commented on OPENJPA-922:
Since the test case is likely to fail on
15 matches
Mail list logo