[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-1929) ValueHandlers try to immediately write even though one is only reading

ValueHandlers try to immediately write even though one is only reading -- Key: OPENJPA-1929 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1929 Project: OpenJPA Issue

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-673) Entity using Generated Value for primary key and a Version field and no DetachedStae fails to merge

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986406#action_12986406 ] Vermeulen commented on OPENJPA-673: --- I had the same kind of exception as himakiran. It

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] move openjpa-maven-plugin from codehaus to the OpenJPA project

Oki, finally preparing the move now. What are the orga issues we need to resolve first? Here is my checklist upfront: *) go through all files and check the license headers. If they are ALv2 already, then a big part of the work is already fine. *) do a svn log and check if those contributors

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-1912) enhancer generates invalid code if fetch-groups is activated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986662#action_12986662 ] Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912: oki, starting with that stuff now.

[jira] Closed: (OPENJPA-1905) jar-file validation should be deferred until after OpenJPA is confirmed to be the application's chosen provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jody Grassel closed OPENJPA-1905. - Resolution: Fixed jar-file validation should be deferred until after OpenJPA is confirmed to

[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-1930) OpenJPA's batching update constraint manager currently does not retrieve non primary key identity fields on an insert/update

OpenJPA's batching update constraint manager currently does not retrieve non primary key identity fields on an insert/update Key: OPENJPA-1930

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-1912) enhancer generates invalid code if fetch-groups is activated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986772#action_12986772 ] Rick Curtis commented on OPENJPA-1912: -- Any objections or tips? Goodluck... Serp

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-1912) enhancer generates invalid code if fetch-groups is activated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986775#action_12986775 ] Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912: nah, I already fixed bytecode issues in

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-1912) enhancer generates invalid code if fetch-groups is activated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986796#action_12986796 ] Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912: got it roughly working, but I'm not sure

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-1912) enhancer generates invalid code if fetch-groups is activated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1912: --- Attachment: OPENJPA-1912-fix-wo_cleanup.patch Hi! This patch fixes the issue but still

Is there a desire to address OPENJPA-1376 (allocationSize incorrect implementation)?

The OPENJPA-1376 issue notes that the allocationSize value on the @SequenceGenerator annotation is not behaving as expected (the issue incorrectly states this behavior is set on the @GeneratedValue annotation). The behavior I'd expect is the same as described in the issue - that the