Re: Tests are ignored

parent by specifying david jencks

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2 and geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0-CR5 for OpenJPA (2nd try)

which I would expect would generate the tags directly. thanks david jencks On Oct 1, 2009, at 8:32 AM, Donald Woods wrote: OpenJPA would like to release a 2.0.0 Milestone 3 release next week based on the JPA 2.0 PFD2 spec level. To do this, they need released versions of the Geronim

Re: Streaming BLOB/LOB : who closes the stream?

has convinced me that something that reads from a supplied input stream has no business deciding whether to close it. thanks david jencks Simone -- Simone GianniCEO Semeru s.r.l. Apache Committer http://www.simonegianni.it/

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-969) In the J2ee environment, when the sequence table is used for identity, if only one datasource is created, the application hangs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680527#action_12680527 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-969: -- I've never got openJPA to work on

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-951) Javadoc jar file does not contain legal files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678369#action_12678369 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-951: -- In my experience using the maven-re

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-949) Allow override of Surefire test excludes from cmdline

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12678124#action_12678124 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-949: -- I haven't actually looked at either

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-882) Upgrade to latest Geronimo Spec releases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12669351#action_12669351 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-882: -- I think this upgrade only actually cha

Re: OPENJPA-772 and OPENJPA-882 ready for review

nough, as Donald has done? I don't know how geronimo got its patch available checkbox but since we have it and can reopen bugs there must be a way you can too :-) thanks david jencks Craig On Jan 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote: I have attached patches to both JIRAs and

Re: [CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec first early access release

conditions are changed at which point the existing jar under vote will be OK. thanks david jencks -Donald David Jencks wrote: Looks like a problem. I sent a note to legal-discuss about (iii). I'll work on setting up a new release candidate. thanks david jencks On Jan 29, 2009, at

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-772) Proper maven pluginManagement and use ianal-maven-plugin for enforcing legal files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12668549#action_12668549 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-772: -- Michael -- The maven-remote-resou

[VOTE] geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec first early access release

the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal files are ok. Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks

Re: OpenJPA trunk is open for business

f 1.0-EA-1. Suggestions welcomed :-) Do you read the spec labeling requirements differently? thanks david jencks On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Michael Dick wrote: Hi all, There are two (AFAIK) outstanding questions regarding the new release. 1. Do we want / need a formal JIRA release for 2.0.0-

Re: Entities not flushing into oracle database.

ommit true. Getting this setting wrong could easily lead to the symptoms you observe. On the other hand if you are using the oracle specific wrapper I think there might be some other problem. thanks david jencks On Dec 29, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Phani Madgula wrote: Hi, I am using A

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-826) moving some code outside of lock boundaries, that don't need to be locked

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656263#action_12656263 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-826: -- These changes look to me like they intro

Re: slices hangs if run with Multithreaded=true

round/implementation using separate tx branches for each thread. Talking with other tm designers there doesn't seem to be enough demand for this multithreaded tx feature to support implementing it. thanks david jencks On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Fernando Padilla wrote: Alright Pinaki.

Re: [VOTE] Turn off enhancement by subclassing as the default

eople who don't make any effort to enhance their classes Correct? thanks david jencks On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote: Hi, This is a tough decision, but one that I think we need to make. If you have been following the dev mailing list, there have been several discussio

Re: internal-repository??

nimo to support this technique. Yes, I work for IBM but I've never seen any websphere code and haven't looked at the classes in the disputed jar beyond their names via jar - tf. thanks david jencks On Nov 21, 2008, at 10:57 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Nov 21, 2008, at 10:36 A

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-779) patch for eclipse .project and .classpath files...

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12650422#action_12650422 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-779: -- I'm not very involved in openjpa

Re: internal-repository??

eemed like a great idea to me and getting it into a spec api seems like the best of all worlds to me. thanks david jencks Michael Dick wrote: Hi all, Obviously IANAL. I think that my comments in the pom.xml file are poorly worded though and are not in line with the actual license.

Re: internal-repository??

OK to include in svn has this been raised on legal-discuss? Since this is an area often subject to confusion and strong opinions it might be clearest for the future if there is a legal-discuss jira issue that's mentioned in the pom. I don't see guidance on http://www.apache.or

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-772) Use apache pom as parent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated OPENJPA-772: - Attachment: OPENJPA-772-2.patch This patch uses the maven-remote-resources plugin to install

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-772) Use apache pom as parent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated OPENJPA-772: - Attachment: OPENJPA-772.patch Patch sets parent pom and changes spec version to the 2.0 EA

[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-772) Use apache pom as parent

Reporter: David Jencks Fix For: 2.0.0 Its fairly standard in apache projects to use the apache pom as the parent. Among other things it specifies the apache snapshot repo as one of the repositories which will be needed until the 2.0 spec jar is finalized. -- This message

Re: Updating the JPA spec jar for JPA 2.0

decide to do anything you want. I have no problem applying patches promptly and pushing snapshots. I would expect it to involve less pom updating to start out with the jar you intend to end with and only have to change the version, presumably with a root pom property. thanks david jencks -

Re: Updating the JPA spec jar for JPA 2.0

On Nov 11, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Di, 11.11.2008: This points out the possible problem that the jpa 1.0 spec appeared to be part of the ejb 3.0 spec so I gave it

Re: Updating the JPA spec jar for JPA 2.0

On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:42 PM, Michael Dick wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:34 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: On Nov 10, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Jeremy, On Nov 10, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Jeremy Bauer wrote: OpenJPA & Geronimo devs, Efforts are u

Re: Updating the JPA spec jar for JPA 2.0

icially). This points out the possible problem that the jpa 1.0 spec appeared to be part of the ejb 3.0 spec so I gave it a spec version number of 3.0. Any suggestions about what to do about this would be appreciated. thanks david jencks Craig Thoughts/ideas/opinions? -Jeremy (Op

Re: [jira] Created: (OPENJPA-736) Combine insert and select SQL together when for generated Id with strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY

isn't there a db independent jdbc feature for this now? thanks david jencks On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Fay Wang (JIRA) wrote: Combine insert and select SQL together when for generated Id with strategy=GenerationType.IDE

Re: TransactionSynchronizationRegistry reference cached permanently

y the same object is pretty much an accident waiting to happen. thanks david jencks Craig On Aug 15, 2008, at 4:10 PM, David Blevins wrote: Seems there are some slight differences in the way OpenJPA tracks the TransactionManager reference versus the TransactionSynchroni

Re: [VOTE] Approve OpenJPA 1.1.0 release

ttp://activemq.apache.org/release-guide.html ("new method", not "old method") thanks david jencks On May 15, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote: What we need to vote on are the (reproducible) release artifacts: the source and binary distributions with asc and md5 sig/ ch

Re: OPENJPA-149

ace/class using reflection? I've been having big problems with openjpa in geronimo unless I supply both the jta and non-jta datasources. I have some hope that if I can implement such a "doInNewTx" method I'll be able to solve these problems. thanks david jencks On Apr 16, 2

Re: Line endings

hanks david jencks On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi David, Thanks for volunteering to do this. I recall we discussed whether to use LF or native. But I don't recall the outcome. The reason to use LF is for Windows users who use unix tools. The reason to use nat

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-364) maven build order is incorrect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated OPENJPA-364: - Attachment: OPENJPA-364-3.patch I'm not sure what the previous patch that modifies the roo

Re: Names of patches for jira issues

blems B and C compared to OPENJPA-123.2.patch from july 12 at 9:41" I like OPENJPA-123-2.patcch but that's probably just because it's the style I've been using. thanks david jencks Craig On Aug 11, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Pinaki Poddar wrote: Hi Craig, My suggestion wa

Re: How does to OpenJPA be declared in pom.xml?

epository/org/apache/openjpa mvn -U If you are trying to build your own openjpa locally you might need to run mvn install on openjpa to get it into your local repo. I believe package only builds the jar, but does not copy it into the local repo so anything else can use it. hope this helps

Re: Injecting EntityManager to a web controller

k it up in jndi yourself. thanks david jencks Is it the same way as shown in OpenJPA examples? Thanks in advance -- Let's create a highly maintainable and efficient code YM!: thejavafreak Blog: http://www.nagasakti.or.id/roller/joshua/

Re: [DISCUSS] use backport-concurrent instead of repackaged concurrent classes

This begs the question of what the need to support jdk 1.4 is, and whether the jdk 1.4 use case is small enough so it can be handled with retrotranslator so the actual code and use the real jdk 1.5 concurrent library. thanks david jencks On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-244) Java 2 Security enablement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501024 ] David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-244: -- Would it make any sense to, rather than having a class with static

Re: Injecting Entity Manager to POJO/Form Bean

;t be some arbitrary class, it has to be managed in some way by the app server, such as an EJB class, servlet, app client main class, app client CallbackHandler, or jsf managed bean. Furthermore the container has to create it, not your code. thanks david jencks On Jun 1, 2007, at 2: